Abstract
Models of above-ground tree biomass have been widely used to estimate forest biomass using national forest inventory data. However, many sources of uncertainty affect above-ground biomass estimation and are challenging to assess. In this study, the uncertainties associated with the measurement error in independent variables (diameter at breast height, tree height), residual variability, variances of the parameter estimates, and the sampling variability of national inventory data are estimated for five above-ground biomass models. The results show sampling variability is the most significant source of uncertainty. The measurement error and residual variability have negligible effects on forests above-ground biomass estimations. Thus, a reduction in the uncertainty of the sampling variability has the greatest potential to decrease the overall uncertainty. The power model containing only the diameter at breast height has the smallest uncertainty. The findings of this study provide suggestions to achieve a trade-off between accuracy and cost for above-ground biomass estimation using field work.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alongi DM, Clough BF, Dixon P, Tirendi F (2003) Nutrient partitioning and storage in arid-zone forests of the mangroves Rhizophora stylosa and Avicennia marina. Trees 17(1):51–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-002-0206-2
Berger A, Gschwantner T, McRoberts RE, Schadauer K (2014) Effects of measurement errors on individual tree stem volume estimates for the Austrian National Forest Inventory. For Sci 60(1):14–24. https://doi.org/10.5849/forsci.12-164
Bonan GB, Pollard D, Thompson SL (1992) Effects of boreal forest vegetation on global climate. Nature 359(6397):716–718. https://doi.org/10.1038/359716a0
Breidenbach J, Antón-Fernández C, Petersson H, McRoberts RE, Astrup R (2014) Quantifying the model-related variability of biomass stock and change estimates in the Norwegian National Forest Inventory. For Sci 60(1):25–33. https://doi.org/10.5849/forsci.12-137
Butt N, Slade E, Thompson J, Malhi Y, Riutta T (2013) Quantifying the sampling error in tree census measurements by volunteers and its effect on carbon stock estimates. Ecol Appl 23(4):936–943. https://doi.org/10.1890/11-2059.1
Cecep K, Topik H, Tatang T, Omo R, Istomo. (2018) Allometric models for above- and below-ground biomass of sonneratia spp. Glob Ecol Conserv 15:e00417
Chave J, Condit R, Lao S, Caspersen JP, Foster RB, Hubbell SP (2003) Spatial and temporal variation of biomass in a tropical forest: results from a large census plot in Panama. J Ecol 91:240–252. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2745.2003.00757.x
Chave J, Condit R, Aguilar S, Hernandez A, Lao S, Perez R (2004) Error propagation and scaling for tropical forest biomass estimates. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 359(1443):409–420. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2003.1425
Chen Q, Vaglio Laurin G, Valentini R (2015) Uncertainty of remotely sensed aboveground biomass over an African tropical forest: propagating errors from trees to plots to pixels. Remote Sens Environ 160:134–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2015.01.009
Corona P, Fattorini L, Franceschi S, Scrinzi G, Torresan C (2014) Estimation of standing wood volume in forest compartments by exploiting airborne laser scanning information: model-based, design-based, and hybrid perspectives. Can J For Res 44:1303–1311
Efron B, Tibshirani R (1986) Bootstrap methods for standard errors, confidence intervals, and other measures of statistical accuracy. Stat Sci 1(1):54–75
Elzinga C, Shearer RC, Elzinga G (2005) Observer variation in tree diameter measurements. West J Appl For 20(2):134–137. https://doi.org/10.1093/wjaf/20.2.134
Foley JA, DeFries R, Asner GP, Barford C, Bonan G, Carpenter SR, Chapin FS, Coe MT, Daily GC, Gibbs HK, Helkowski JH, Holloway T, Howard EA, Kucharik CJ, Monfreda C, Patz JA, Prentice IC, Ramankutty N, Snyder PK (2005) Global consequences of land use. Science 309(5734):570–574. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1111772
Fu Y, Lei Y, Zeng W, Hao R, Zhang G, Zhong Q, Xu M (2017) Uncertainty assessment in aboveground biomass estimation at the regional scale using a new method considering both sampling error and model error. Can J For Res 47(8):1095–1103. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2016-0436
Gertner GZ (1990) The sensitivity of measurement error in stand volume estimation. Can J For Res 20(6):800–804. https://doi.org/10.1139/x90-105
Gharun M, Possell M, Jenkins ME, Poon LF, Bell TL, Adams MA (2017) Improving forest sampling strategies for assessment of fuel reduction burning. For Ecol Manag 392:78–89
Goodman RC, Phillips OL, Baker TR (2014) The importance of crown dimensions to improve tropical tree biomass estimates. Ecol Appl 24(4):680–698. https://doi.org/10.1890/13-0070.1
Guo H, Zhang M, Xu L, Yuan Z, Qin L, Chen T (2016) Simulation of regional forest carbon storage under different sampling densities. Acta Ecol Sin 36(14):4373–4385
Hinkley DV (1988) Bootstrap methods. J R Stat Soc 50(3):321–337
Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S (1989) Applied logistic regression. Wiley, New York, p 307
Jenkins JC, Chojancky DC, Heath LS, Birdsey RA (2004) Comprehensive database of diameter-based biomass regressions for North American tree species. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Research Station, Newtown Square, PA
Keller M, Palace M, Hurtt G (2001) Biomass estimation in the Tapajos National Forest, Brazil: examination of sampling and allometric uncertainties. For Ecol Manag 154(3):371–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00509-6
Ketterings QM, Coe R, van Noordwijk M, Ambagau’ Y, Palm CA. (2001) Reducing uncertainty in the use of allometric biomass equations for predicting above-ground tree biomass in mixed secondary forests. For Ecol Manag 146(1):199–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00460-6
Lambert MC, Ung CH, Raulier F (2005) Canadian national tree aboveground biomass equations. Can J For Res 35(8):1996–2018. https://doi.org/10.1139/x05-112
Li H, Fa L (2011) Height-diameter model for major tree species in China using the classified height method. Sci Silvae Sin 47(10):83–90. https://doi.org/10.11707/j.1001-7488.20111013
Martínez-Sánchez JL, Martínez-Garza C, Cámara L, Castillo O (2020) Species-specific or generic allometric equations: which option is better when estimating the biomass of Mexican tropical humid forests? Carbon Manag 11(3):241–249
Mauya EW, Hansen EH, Gobakken T, Bollandsås OM, Malimbwi RE, Næsset E (2015) Effects of field plot size on prediction accuracy of aboveground biomass in airborne laser scanning-assisted inventories in tropical rain forests of Tanzania. Carbon Balance Manag 10(1):10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13021-015-0021-x
McRoberts RE, Westfall JA (2013) Effects of uncertainty in model predictions of individual tree volume on large area volume estimates. For Sci 60(1):34–42. https://doi.org/10.5849/forsci.12-141
McRoberts RE, Westfall JA (2016) Propagating uncertainty through individual tree volume model predictions to large-area volume estimates. Ann For Sci 73(3):625–633. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-015-0473-x
McRoberts RE, Hahn JT, Hefty GJ, Cleve JRV (1994) Variation in forest inventory field measurements. Can J For Res 24(9):1766–1770. https://doi.org/10.1139/x94-228
McRoberts RE, Moser P, Zimermann Oliveira L, Vibrans AC (2014) A general method for assessing the effects of uncertainty in individual-tree volume model predictions on large-area volume estimates with a subtropical forest illustration. Can J For Res 45(1):44–51. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2014-0266
McRoberts RE, Chen Q, Domke GM, Stahl G, Saarela S, Westfall JA (2016) Hybrid estimators for mean aboveground carbon per unit area. For Ecol Manag 378:44–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2016.07.007
Molto Q, Rossi V, Blanc L (2013) Error propagation in biomass estimation in tropical forests. Methods Ecol Evol 4(2):175–183. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210x.2012.00266.x
Muller-Landau HC, Condit RS, Chave J, Thomas SC, Bohlman SA, Bunyavejchewin S, Davies S, Foster R, Gunatilleke S, Gunatilleke N, Harms KE, Hart T, Hubbell SP, Itoh A, Kassim AR, LaFrankie JV, Lee HS, Losos E, Makana JR, Ohkubo T, Sukumar R, Sun IF, Nur Supardi MN, Tan S, Thompson J, Valencia R, Muñoz GV, Wills C, Yamakura T, Chuyong G, Dattaraja HS, Esufali S, Hall P, Hernandez C, Kenfack D, Kiratiprayoon S, Suresh HS, Thomas D, Vallejo MI, Ashton P (2006) Testing metabolic ecology theory for allometric scaling of tree size, growth and mortality in tropical forests. Ecol Lett 9(5):575–588. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00904.x
Ngomanda A, Engone Obiang NL, Lebamba J, Moundounga Mavouroulou Q, Gomat H, Mankou GS, Loumeto J, Midoko Iponga D, Kossi Ditsouga F, Zinga Koumba R, BobéKH B, Mikala Okouyi C, Nyangadouma R, Lépengué N, Mbatchi B, Picard N (2014) Site-specific versus pantropical allometric equations: which option to estimate the biomass of a moist central African forest? For Ecol Manag 312:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2013.10.029
Peter B, Tom N (2011) Effects of basal area factor and plot size on precision and accuracy of forest inventory estimates. North J Appl For 28(28):152–156
Petersson H, Holm S, Ståhl G, Alger D, Fridman J, Lehtonen A, Lundström A, Mäkipää R (2012) Individual tree biomass equations or biomass expansion factors for assessment of carbon stock changes in living biomass—a comparative study. For Ecol Manag 270:78–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2012.01.004
Picard N, Boyemba Bosela F, Rossi V (2015) Reducing the error in biomass estimates strongly depends on model selection. Ann For Sci 72(6):811–823. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-014-0434-9
Qin L, Liu Q, Zhang M, Saeed S (2019) Effect of measurement errors on the estimation of tree biomass. Can J For Res 49(11):1371–1378. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2019-0034
Rubin DB (1987) Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. Wiley, New York, p 258
Salk CF, Chazdon RL, Andersson KP (2013) Detecting landscape-level changes in tree biomass and biodiversity: methodological constraints and challenges of plot-based approaches. Can J For Res 43(9):799–808. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2013-0048
Shen J (2002) Establishment and application of relative H curve models for main tree species Type in Ji’an. Jiangxi For Sci Technol 1:16–19
Shettles M, Temesgen H, Gray AN, Hilker T (2015) Comparison of uncertainty in per unit area estimates of aboveground biomass for two selected model sets. For Ecol Manag 354:18–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2015.07.002
Sileshi GW (2014) A critical review of forest biomass estimation models, common mistakes and corrective measures. For Ecol Manag 329:237–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.06.026
Ståhl G, Saarela S, Schnell S, Holm S, Breidenbach J, Healey SP, Patterson PL, Magnussen S, Naesset E, McRoberts RE, Gregoire TG (2016) Use of models in large-area forest surveys: comparing model-assisted, model-based and hybrid estimation. For Ecosyst 2(2016):153–163. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40663-016-0064-9
Temesgen H, Affleck D, Poudel K, Gray A, Sessions J (2015) A review of the challenges and opportunities in estimating above ground forest biomass using tree-level models. Scand J For Res 30(4):326–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2015.1012114
van Breugel M, Ransijn J, Craven D, Bongers F, Hall JS (2011) Estimating carbon stock in secondary forests: decisions and uncertainties associated with allometric biomass models. For Ecol Manag 262(8):1648–1657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2011.07.018
Wallner A, Elatawneh A, Schneider T, Kindu M, Ossig B, Knoke T (2018) Remotely sensed data controlled forest inventory concept. Eur J Remote Sens 51(1):75–87
Wang G, Oyana T, Zhang M, Adu-Prah S, Zeng S, Lin H, Se J (2009) Mapping and spatial uncertainty analysis of forest vegetation carbon by combining national forest inventory data and satellite images. For Ecol Manag 258(7):1275–1283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2009.06.056
Wang J, Tang J, Guo Y, Gao Y, Yao Y (2015) Aboveground biomass estimation model of two shrubs to Aohan banner northern wind-sandy area in Inner Mongolia. Agric Eng 5(6):44–47
Wayson CA, Johnson KD, Cole JA, Olguín MI, Carrillo OI, Birdsey RA (2015) Estimating uncertainty of allometric biomass equations with incomplete fit error information using a pseudo-data approach: methods. Ann For Sci 72(6):825–834. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-014-0436-7
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Chuchu Shen for the helping in calibration data acquisition.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Corresponding editor: Zhu Hong.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Project funding: This work was supported financially by the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2017YFC0506503-02).
The online version is available at https://www.springerlink.com.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Qin, L., Meng, S., Zhou, G. et al. Uncertainties in above ground tree biomass estimation. J. For. Res. 32, 1989–2000 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-020-01243-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-020-01243-2