Advertisement

Land use and above-ground biomass changes in a mountain ecosystem, northern Thailand

  • Sutheera Hermhuk
  • Aingorn Chaiyes
  • Sathid Thinkampheang
  • Noppakun Danrad
  • Dokrak MarodEmail author
Original Paper
  • 51 Downloads

Abstract

The conversion of forests into agricultural lands is a major cause of deforestation, particularly in the mountain ecosystems of northern Thailand. It results in a rapid loss of biological diversity of both flora and fauna. In addition, the above-ground biomass (AGB), which can be a major source of carbon storage, is also decreased. This study aimed to predict the AGB in Doi Suthep-Pui National Park, Chiang Mai province, based on land-use/land cover (LULC) changes from 2000 to 2030. Landsat-5 TM (2000) and Landsat-8 TM (2015) satellite images were analyzed to predict LULC changes to 2030. Temporary plots (30 m × 30 m) were established in each LULC type for AGB analysis; trees with diameters at breast height ≥ 4.5 cm were identified and measured. AGB of all LULC types were analyzed based on specific allometric equations of each type. The results show that area of forest and non-forested areas fluctuated during the study period. Through the first 15 years (2000–2015), 5% (2.9 km2) of forest changed to either agriculture or urban lands, especially mixed deciduous forest and lower montane forest. There was a similar trend in the 2030 prediction, showing the effect of forest fragmentation and the resultant high number of patches. Total AGB tended to decrease over the 30-year period from 12.5 to 10.6 t ha−1 in the first and second periods, respectively. Deforestation was the main factor influencing the loss of AGB (30.6 t ha−1) related to LULC changes. Furthermore, habitat loss would be expected to result in decreased biological diversity. Consequently, a management plan should be developed to avoid unsustainable land use changes, which may adversely affect human well-being.

Keywords

Land-use changes Above-ground biomass Cellular automata Markov chain Doi Suthep-Pui National Park Chiang Mai province 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the head of the Doi Suthep-Pui National Park, Chiang Mai Province and his assistant as well as the students from the Thai Forest Ecological Research Network (T-FERN) who contributed to the field observations.

References

  1. Arsanjani JJ, Helbich M, Kainz W, Boloorani AD (2011) Integration of logistic regression, Markov chains and cellular automata models to simulate urban expansion. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf 21:264–272Google Scholar
  2. Attarchi S, Gloaguen R (2014) Improving the estimation of above ground biomass using dual polarimetric PALSAR and ETM+ data in the Hyrcanian mountain forest (Iran). Remote Sens 6(5):3693–3715Google Scholar
  3. Attiwill PM (1994) The disturbance of forest ecosystems: the ecological basis for conservative management. For Ecol Manag 63(2–3):247–300Google Scholar
  4. Barbour MG, Burk JH, Pitts WD (1980) Terrestrial plant ecology. Benjamin/Cummings, San Francisco, p 240Google Scholar
  5. Basuki TM, Van Laake PE, Skidmore AK, Hussin YA (2009) Allometric equations for estimating the above-ground biomass in tropical lowland Dipterocarp forests. For Ecol Manag 257(8):1684–1694Google Scholar
  6. Boillat S, Stich C, Bastide J, Hussin YA (2015) Do relocated villages experience more forest cover change? Resettlements, shifting cultivation and forests in the Lao PDR. Environments 2(2):250–279Google Scholar
  7. Boonkird SA, Fernandes ECM, Nair PKR (1984) Forest villages: an agroforestry approach to rehabilitating forest land degraded by shifting cultivation in Thailand. Agrofor Syst 2(2):87–102Google Scholar
  8. Chaiyo U, Garivait S, Wanthongchai K (2011) Carbon storage in above-ground biomass of tropical deciduous forest in Ratchaburi Province, Thailand. World Acad Sci Eng Technol 58:636–641Google Scholar
  9. Charnsungnern M, Tantanasarit S (2017) Environmental sustainability of highland agricultural land use patterns for Mae Raem and Mae Sa watersheds, Chiang Mai province. Kasetsart J (Soc Sci) 38:169–174Google Scholar
  10. Cuni-Sanchez A, Pfeifer M, Marchant R, Calders K, Sørensen CL, Pompeu PV, Burgess ND (2017) New insights on above ground biomass and forest attributes in tropical montane forests. For Ecol Manag 399:235–246Google Scholar
  11. Delang CO (2002) Deforestation in northern Thailand: the result of Hmong farming practices or Thai development strategies? Soc Nat Resour 15(6):483–501Google Scholar
  12. Dewan MA, Kabir MH, Nahar K, Rahman MZ (2012) Urbanization and environmental degradation in Dhaka Metropolitan area of Bangladesh. Int J Environ Sustain Dev 11(2):118–147Google Scholar
  13. Diogo IJS, Fortunato ME, Costa IR (2015) Seed deposition in the edge-interior gradient of a degraded fragment of tropical semideciduous forest, Northeastern Brazil. Rev Biol Trop 63(4):98–994Google Scholar
  14. Elliott S, Kuaraksa C (2008) Producing framework tree species for restoring forest ecosystems in Northern Thailand. Small-scale For 7:403–415Google Scholar
  15. Erni C (2015) Shifting cultivation, livelihood and food security: new and old challenges for indigenous peoples in Asia. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, p 150Google Scholar
  16. Folega F, Zhang CY, Zhao XH, Wala K, Batawila K, Huang HG, Dourma M, Akpagana K (2014) Satellite monitoring of land-use and land-cover changes in northern Togo protected areas. J For Res 25(2):385–392Google Scholar
  17. Fukushima M, Kanzaki M, Hara M, Ohkubo T, Preechapanya P, Choocharoen C (2008) Secondary forest succession after the cessation of swidden cultivation in the montane forest area in Northern Thailand. For Ecol Manag 255(5):1994–2006Google Scholar
  18. Ghosh J, Porchelvan P (2017) Remote sensing and GIS technique enable to assess and predict landuse changes in Vellore district, Tamil Nadu, India. IJAER 12(12):3474–3482Google Scholar
  19. Halmy WWA, Gessler PE, Hicke JA, Salem BB (2015) Land use/land cover change detection and prediction in the north-western coastal desert of Egypt using Markov-CA. Appl Geogr 63:101–112Google Scholar
  20. Han HR, Yang CF, Song JP (2015) Scenario simulation and the prediction of land use and land cover change in Beijing, China. Sustainability 7(4):4260–4279Google Scholar
  21. Huang WL, Liu HP, Luan QZ, Jiang Q, Liu J, Liu H (2008) Detection and prediction of land use change in Beijing based on remote sensing and GIS. ISPRS 37(6b):75–82Google Scholar
  22. Iglesias MR, Barchuk A, Grilli MP (2012) Carbon storage, community structure and canopy cover: a comparison along a precipitation gradient. For Ecol Manag 265:218–229Google Scholar
  23. Kavinchan N, Wongpakapattanawong P, Elliott S, Chairuangsri S, Pinthong J (2015) Soil organic carbon stock inrestored and natural forest in Northern Thailand. KKU Res J 20(3):294–304Google Scholar
  24. Köhl M, Lasco R, Cifuentes M, Jonsson Ö, Korhonen K, Mundhenk P, Navar JDJ, Stinson G (2015) Changes in forest production, biomass and carbon: results from the 2015 UN FAO global forest resource assessment. For Ecol Manag 352:21–34Google Scholar
  25. Lauf S, Haase D, Hostert P, Lakes T, Kleinschimt B (2012) Uncovering land-use dynamics driven by human decision-making—a combined model approach using cellular automata and system dynamics. Environ Model Softw 27:71–82Google Scholar
  26. Long Y, Jin XB, Yang XH, Zhou YK (2014) Reconstruction of historical arable land use patterns using constrained cellular automata: a case study of Jiangsu, China. Appl Geogr 52:64–77Google Scholar
  27. López E, Bocco G, Mendoza M, Duhau E (2001) Predicting land-cover and land-use change in the urban fringe: a case in Morelia city, Mexico. Landsc Urban Plan 55(4):271–285Google Scholar
  28. Lu RC, Huang XJ, Zuo TH, Xiao SS, Zhao XF, Zhang XY (2009) Land use scenarios simulation based on CLUE-S and Markov Composite Model—a case study of Taihu Lake Rim in Jiangsu Province. Sci Geol Sinica 29:577–581Google Scholar
  29. MacArthur RH, Wilson EO (1967) The theory of island biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton, p 224Google Scholar
  30. Marod D, Kutintara U, Tanaka H, Nakashizuka T (1999) Structural dynamics in a mixed deciduous forest western Thailand. J Veg Sci 10(6):777–786Google Scholar
  31. Marod D, Kutintara U, Tanaka H, Nakashizuka T (2002) The effects of drought and fire on seed and seedling dynamics in a tropical seasonal forest in Thailand. Plant Ecol 161:41–57Google Scholar
  32. Marod D, Duengkae P, Asanok L, Pattanavibool A (2012) Vegetation structure and floristic composition along the edge of montane forest and agricultural land in Um Phang Wildlife Sanctuary, Western Thailand. Kasetsart J (Nat Sci) 46(2):162–180Google Scholar
  33. Marod D, Sangkaew S, Panmongkal A, Jingjai A (2014) Influences of environmental factors on tree distribution of lower montane evergreen forest at Doi Sutep-Pui National park, Chiang Mai Province. Thai J For 33(3):23–33Google Scholar
  34. McGarigal K (2015) FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. University of Massachusetts, Amherst, p 122Google Scholar
  35. Mohandass D, Davidar P (2009) Floristic structure and diversity of a tropical montane evergreen forest (shola) of the Nilgiri Mountains, southern India. Trop Ecol 50(2):219–229Google Scholar
  36. Monasterio M, Smith JK, Molinillo M (2006) Agricultural development and biodiversity conservation in Paramo environments of the Andes of Merida, Venezuela. In: Spehn EM, Liberman M, Korner C (eds) Land use change and mountain biodiversity. CRC Press, Cambridge, pp 307–319Google Scholar
  37. Nandakwang P, Elliott S, Lumyong S (2008) Diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in forest restoration area of Doi Suthep-Pui National Park, Northern Thailand. JMST 22:60–64Google Scholar
  38. Nouri J, Gharagozlou A, Arjmandi R, Faryadi S, Adl M (2014) Predicting urban land use changes using a CA–Markov model. Arab J Sci Eng 39(7):5565–5573Google Scholar
  39. Ochoa-Gaona S (2001) Traditional land-use systems and patterns of forest fragmentation in the highlands of Chiapas, Mexico. Environ Manag 27(4):571–586Google Scholar
  40. Ogawa H, Yoda K, Ogino K, Kira T (1965) Comparative ecological studies on three main types of forest vegetation in Thailand. Plant biomass. Nat Life Southeast Asia 4:49–80Google Scholar
  41. Phillips OL, Malhi Y, Higuchi N, Laurance WF, Núñez PV, Vásquez Laurance SG, Ferreira LV, Stern M, Brown S, Grace J (1998) Changes in the carbon balance of tropical forests: evidence from long-term plots. Science 282:439–442Google Scholar
  42. Pibumrung P, Gajaseni N, Popan A (2008) Profiles of carbon stocks in forest, reforestation and agricultural land, Northern Thailand. J For Res 19(1):11–18Google Scholar
  43. Raabová J, Münzbergová Z, Fischer M (2007) Ecological rather than geographic or genetic distance affects local adaptation of the rare perennial herb, Aster amellus. Biol Conserv 139(3):348–357Google Scholar
  44. Ramankutty N, Gibbs HK, Achard F, Defries R, Foley JA, Houghton RA (2007) Challenges to estimating carbon emissions from tropical deforestation. Glob Change Biol 13(1):51–66Google Scholar
  45. Rerkasem K, Yimyam N, Rerkasem B (2009) Land use transformation in the mountainous mainland Southeast Asia region and the role of indigenous knowledge and skills in forest management. For Ecol Manag 257(10):2035–2043Google Scholar
  46. Rhodes BP, Conejo R, Benchawan T, Titus S, Lawson R (2005) Palaeocurrents and provenance of the Mae Rim Formation, Northern Thailand: implications for tectonic evolution of the Chiang Mai basin. J Geol Soc 162(1):51–63Google Scholar
  47. Rutledge D (2003) Landscape indices as measures of the effects of fragmentation: can pattern reflect process? Department of Conservation, WellingtonGoogle Scholar
  48. Sahana JM, Jennifer J, Vanmathy S (2016) Land use/land cover change prediction using clue-s model. IJEST 6(3):176–182Google Scholar
  49. Sahunalu P, Dhanmanonda P, Suwannapinant W, Saengtongpraw S (1980) Primary production of pine plantation (Pinus kesiya Royle ex Gordon) in Hot District, Chiang Mai Province. Depaertment of Silviculture Faculty of Forestry, Kasetsart University, Bangkok (in Thai) Google Scholar
  50. San B, Kanzaki M, Aung M, Htay KM (2016) Assessment of the recovery of a secondary tropical dry forest after human disturbance in central Myanmar. JTFS 28(4):479–489Google Scholar
  51. Santisuk T (2012) Forest in Thailand. Department of National Park, Wildlife and Plants Conservation, Bangkok (in Thai) Google Scholar
  52. Spracklen DV, Righelato R (2014) Tropical montane forests are a larger than expected global carbon store. Biogeosciences 11(10):2741–2754Google Scholar
  53. Teejuntuk S, Sahunalu P, Sakurai K (2002) Forest structure and tree species diversity along an altitudinal gradient in Doi Inthanon National Park, Northern Thailand. Tropics 12(2):85–102Google Scholar
  54. Tiwari K, Khanduri K (2011) Land use/Land cover change detection in Doon valley (Dehradun tahasil) Uttarakhand: using GIS and remote sensing technique. IJGGS 2(1):34–41Google Scholar
  55. Trisurat Y (2010) Land use and forested landscape changes at Sakaerat environmental research station in Nakhon Ratchasima province, Thailand. Ekologia (Bratisl) 29(1):99–109Google Scholar
  56. Tse-ring K, Sharma E, Chettri N, Shrestha AB (2010) Climate change vulnerability of mountain ecosystems in the Eastern Himalayas. International centre for integrated mountain development (ICIMOD), Kathmandu, p 110Google Scholar
  57. Tsutsumi T, Yoda K, Sahunalu P, Dhanmanonda P, Prachaiyo B (1983) Forest: Felling, Burning and Regeneration. In: Kyuma K, Pairitra C (eds) Shifting cultivation. Kyoto University, Kyoto, pp 13–26Google Scholar
  58. Turner IM (2004) The ecological of tree in the tropical rain forest. Cambridge University, Cambridge, p 252Google Scholar
  59. Ullah S, Farooq M, Shafique M, Siyab MA, Kareem F, Dees M (2016) Spatial assessment of forest cover and land-use changes in the Hindu-Kush mountain ranges of northern Pakistan. J Mt Sci 13(7):1229–1237Google Scholar
  60. Vicharnakorn P, Shrestha RP, Nagai M, Salam AP, Kiratiprayoon S (2014) Carbon stock assessment using remote sensing and forest inventory data in Savannakhet, Lao PDR. Remote Sens 6(6):5452–5479Google Scholar
  61. Virapongse A (2017) Smallholders and forest landscape restoration in upland northern Thailand. IFR 19(4):102–119Google Scholar
  62. Wang XL, Bao YH (1999) Study on the methods of land use dynamic change research. Prog Phys Geogr 18(1):81–87Google Scholar
  63. Wang YF, Liu L, Shangguan ZP (2018) Dynamics of forest biomass carbon stocks from 1949 to 2008 in Henan Province, east-central China. J For Res 29(2):439–448Google Scholar
  64. Yang YY, Zhang SW, Yang JC, Xing XS, Wang DY (2015) Using a cellular automata-Markov model to reconstruct spatial land-use patterns in Zhenlai country, Northeast China. Energies 8(5):3882–3902Google Scholar
  65. Yarnvudhi A, Sungkaew S, Hermhuk S, Sunthornhao P, Onprom S (2016) Plant diversity and utilization on ethnobotany of local people at Hmong Doi Pui Village in Doi Suthep-Pui National park, Chiang Mai Province. Thai J For 35(3):136–146Google Scholar
  66. Ye BY, Bai ZK (2007) Simulating land use/land cover changes of Nenjiang County based on CA-Markov model. CCTA 1:321–329Google Scholar
  67. Yimyam N, Lordkaew S, Rerkasem B (2016) Carbon storage in mountain land use systems in Northern Thailand. Mt Res Dev 36(2):183–192Google Scholar
  68. Yirsaw E, Wu W, Shi XP, Temesgen H, Bekele B (2017) Land use/land cover change modeling and the prediction of subsequent changes in ecosystem service values in a coastal area of China, the Su-Xi-Chang region. Sustainability 9(7):1204Google Scholar
  69. Zipperer WC (1993) Deforestation patterns and their effects on forest patches. Landsc Ecol 8(3):177–184Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Northeast Forestry University 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sutheera Hermhuk
    • 1
    • 2
  • Aingorn Chaiyes
    • 3
  • Sathid Thinkampheang
    • 4
  • Noppakun Danrad
    • 2
  • Dokrak Marod
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Center for Advanced Studies in Tropical Natural ResourcesNRU-KU, Kasetsart UniversityBangkokThailand
  2. 2.Department of Forest Biology, Faculty of ForestryKasetsart UniversityBangkokThailand
  3. 3.School of Agriculture and CooperationSukhothai Thammathirat Open UniversityBangkokThailand
  4. 4.Cooperation Center of Thai Forest Ecological Research NetworkKasetsart UniversityBangkokThailand

Personalised recommendations