Advertisement

Journal of Forestry Research

, Volume 29, Issue 3, pp 687–696 | Cite as

Impacts of low-intensity prescribed fire on microbial and chemical soil properties in a Quercus frainetto forest

  • Serdar Akburak
  • Yowhan Son
  • Ender Makineci
  • Meriç Çakir
Original Paper

Abstract

Prescribed fire is a common economical and effective forestry practice, and therefore it is important to understand the effects of fire on soil properties for better soil management. We investigated the impacts of low-intensity prescribed fire on the microbial and chemical properties of the top soil in a Hungarian oak (Quercus frainetto Ten.) forest. The research focused on microbial soil parameters (microbial soil respiration (RSM), soil microbial biomass carbon (Cmic) and metabolic quotient (qCO2) and chemical topsoil properties (soil acidity (pH), electrical conductivity (EC), carbon (C), nitrogen (N), C/N ratio and exchangeable cations). Mean annual comparisons show significant differences in four parameters (C/N ratio, soil pH, Cmic and qCO2) while monthly comparisons do not reveal any significant differences. Soil pH increased slightly in the burned plots and had a significantly positive correlation with exchangeable cations Mg, Ca, Mn and K. The mean annual C/N ratio was significantly higher in the burned plots (28.5:1) than in the control plots (27.0:1). The mean annual Cmic (0.6 mg g−1) was significantly lower although qCO2 (2.5 µg CO2–C mg Cmic h−1) was significantly higher, likely resulting from the microbial response to fire-induced environmental stress. Low-intensity prescribed fire caused very short-lived changes. The annual mean values of C/N ratio, pH, Cmic and qCO2 showed significant differences.

Keywords

C/N Exchangeable cations Microbial biomass carbon qCO2 Soil pH 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit of Istanbul University, Project number: International Research Projects: IRP-27803, as a part of international collaboration between Istanbul University, Istanbul-Turkey and Korea University, Seoul-Korea.

References

  1. Alef K, Nannipieri P (eds) (1995) Estimation of microbial activites. In: Methods in applied soil microbiology and biochemistry. Cambridge, Academic press, p 214–216Google Scholar
  2. Anderson TH, Domsch KH (1986) Carbon assimilation and microbial activity in soil. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 149:457–468Google Scholar
  3. Bento-Gonçalves A, Vieira A, Úbeda X, Martin D (2012) Fire and soils: key concepts and recent advances. Geoderma 191:3–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berber AS, Tavşanoğlu Ç, Turgay OC (2015) Effects of surface fire on soil properties in a mixed chestnut-beech-pine forest in Turkey. Flamma 6(2):78–80Google Scholar
  5. Certini G (2005) Effects of fire on properties of forest soils: a review. Oecologia 143(1):1–10CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. De Marco A, Gentile AE, Arena C, de Virzo Santo AV (2005) Organic matter, nutrient content and biological activity in burned and unburned soils of a Mediterranean marquis area of southern Italy. Int J Wildland Fire 14:365–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Eivazi F, Bayan MR (1996) Effects of long-term prescribed burning on the activity of select soil enzymes in an oak–hickory forest. Can J For Res 26:1799–1804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ferran A, Delitti W, Vallejo VR (2005) Effects of fire recurrence in Quercus coccifera L. shrublands of the Valencia region (Spain): II. Plant and soil nutrients. Plant Ecol 177:71–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gonzalez-Perez JA, Gonzalez-Vila FJ, Almendros G, Knicker H (2004) The effect of fire on soil organic matter—a review. Environ Int 30:855–870CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Granged AJP, Zavala LM, Jordán A, Bárcenas-Moreno G (2011) Post-fire evolution of soil properties and vegetation cover in a Mediterranean heathland after experimental burning: a 3-year study. Geoderma 164:85–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ilstedt U, Giesler R, Nordgren A, Malmer A (2003) Changes in soil chemical and microbial properties after a wildfire in a tropical rainforest in Sabah, Malaysia. Soil Biol Biochem 35:1071–1078CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kantarcı MD (1989) Sedir ormanlarının gençleştirilmesinde uygulanan yangın kültürü ile kültür bakımı yöntemlerinin ekolojik değerlendirilmesi, İ.Ü. Orman Fakültesi Dergisi Seri A 39(2):95–118 (in Turkish) Google Scholar
  13. Marcos E, Villalón C, Calvo L, Luis-Calabuig E (2009) Short-term effects of experimental burning on soil nutrients in the Cantabrian heathlands. Ecol Eng 35:820–828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Meentemeyer RK, Rank NE, Anacker BL, Rizzo DM, Cushman JH (2008) Influence of land-cover change on the spread of an invasive forest pathogen. Ecol Appl 18:159–171CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Nave LE, Vance ED, Swanston CW, Curtis PS (2011) Fire effects on temperate forest soil C and N storage. Ecol Appl 21:1189–1201CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Parra JG, Rivero VC, Lopez TI (1996) Forms of Mn in soils affected by a forest fire. Sci Total Environ 181:231–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pereira P, Úbeda X, Martin D, Mataix-Solera J, Guerrero C (2011) Effects of a low severity prescribed fire on water-soluble elements in ash from a cork oak (Quercus suber) forest located in the northeast of the Iberian Peninsula. Environ Res 111(2):237–247CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Pourreza M, Hosseini SM, Sinegani AAS, Matinizadeh M, Dick WA (2014) Soil microbial activity in response to fire severity in Zagros oak (Quercus brantii Lindl.) forests, Iran, after one year. Geoderma 213:95–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Scharenbroch BC, Nix B, Jacobs KA, Bowles ML (2012) Two decades of low-severity prescribed fire increases soil nutrient availability in a Midwestern, USA oak (Quercus) forest. Geoderma 183:80–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Tüfekçioğlu A, Küçük M, Sağlam B, Bilgili E, Altun L, Küçük Ö (2006) Influence of fire on root biomass dynamics and soil respiration rates in young corsican pine (Pinus nigra) stands in Turkey. For Ecol Manag 234:195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Vega JA, Fontúrbel T, Merino A, Fernández C, Ferreiro A, Jiménez E (2013) Testing the ability of visual indicators of soil burn severity to reflect changes in soil chemical and microbial properties in pine forests and shrubland. Plant Soil 369(1–2):73–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wang Q, Zhong M, Wang S (2012) A meta-analysis on the response of microbial biomass, dissolved organic matter, respiration, and N mineralization in mineral soil to fire in forest ecosystems. For Ecol Manag 271:91–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wardle DA, Ghani A (1995) Critique of the microbial metabolic quotient (qCO2) as a bioindicator of disturbance and ecosystem development. Soil Biol Biochem 27:1601–1610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Williams RJ, Hallgren SW, Wilson GW (2012) Frequency of prescribed burning in an upland oak forest determines soil and litter properties and alters the soil microbial community. For Ecol Manag 265:241–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Yildiz O, Esen D, Sarginci M, Toprak B (2010) Effects of forest fire on soil nutrients in Turkish pine (Pinus brutia, Ten) ecosystems. J Environ Biol 31:11–13PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Northeast Forestry University and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Serdar Akburak
    • 1
  • Yowhan Son
    • 2
  • Ender Makineci
    • 1
  • Meriç Çakir
    • 3
  1. 1.Faculty of Forestry, Soil Science and Ecology DepartmentIstanbul UniversityBahcekoy, SariyerTurkey
  2. 2.Division of Environmental Science and Ecological EngineeringKorea UniversitySeoulKorea
  3. 3.Faculty of Forestry, Soil Science and Ecology DepartmentÇankırı Karatekin UniversityÇankırıTurkey

Personalised recommendations