Genecological zones and selection criteria for natural forest populations for conservation: the case of Boswellia papyrifera in Ethiopia
Rapid changes in land-use in the Combretum–Terminalia woodlands of northwestern Ethiopia are mainly due to the increases in commercial farming and immigration. We used integrated ecological and social data collection techniques, including subdivision of the vegetation zone, vegetation survey, focus group discussions and key informant interviews, to identify genecological zones and set criteria for selection of viable populations of Boswellia papyrifera (Del.) Hochst in Ethiopia for conservation. Interviews of senior experts were supported with a rating method and involved 43 respondents and focused on identifying and weighting criteria and indicators of selection in a participatory way to prioritize populations for conservation. Using mean annual rainfall data, we reclassified the Combretum–Terminalia woodland vegetation region into three moisture zones (wet, moist and dry), and designated them as genecological zones for B. papyrifera conservation. A total of 35 woody species were identified at Lemlem Terara site in Metema district, and the Shannon diversity index and evenness were 2.01 and of 0.62, respectively. There were 405 adult trees, and 10 saplings and 3314 seedlings per ha. The trees were medium-sized with overall mean diameter at breast height (dbh) of 16.9 (±9.5) cm. Seedling recruitment was poor due to grazing, crop production and fire incidences. Through a multi-criteria decision analysis, five criteria and 20 quantitative indicators were identified and weighted to prioritize populations for conservation. These criteria in their descending order of importance are (1) forest ecosystem health and vitality, (2) forest cover and population structure of B. papyrifera, (3) productive function of the forest, (4) biological diversity in the forest, and (5) socioeconomic benefits of the forest to communities. Multivariate tests in the general linear model revealed significant differences among researchers and nonresearchers in rating the criteria and indicators, but not among foresters and nonforesters. Hence, participatory multi-criteria decision analysis should involve people from various institutions to rectify decisions on conservation of the species. Careful evaluation of the investment policy environment and engaging those government bodies that are responsible to allocate the dry forests for commercial farming is recommended before the proposed criteria are applied to select populations for conservation, thus ensuring subsequent use of the outcomes of such exercises and better reconciling conservation and agricultural production increment goals.
KeywordsAgricultural expansion Combretum–Terminalia Indicators Multi-criteria decision analysis method (MCDA) Settlement
All scientists and experts who participated in the focus group discussion and in the refinement and weighing of the criteria and indicators are appreciated. This work was financed by CIFOR through its Community Forestry Project in Ethiopia funded by the Austrian Development Agency (Project No. 2008/03). The authors are thankful to the People and Government of Austria. They are also grateful to the Central Ethiopia Environment and Forestry Research Center, which supported the study by covering the staff time of the lead author.
- Aalbæk A (1993) Tree seed zones for Ethiopia. Forestry Research Center/National Tree Seed Project, Addis Ababa, p 120Google Scholar
- Castañeda F (2000) Criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management: international processes, current status and the way ahead. FAO, Rome, p 13Google Scholar
- FAO (2000) Annex 6: definitions and basic principles of sustainable forest management in relation to criteria and indicators. Italy, Rome, p 7Google Scholar
- FAO (2014) The state of world’s forest genetic resources. Italy, Rome, p 276Google Scholar
- FOREST EUROPE, UNECE, FAO (2011) State of Europe’s Forests 2011. Status and trends in sustainable forest management in Europe. Ministerial conference on the protection of forests in Europe, Forest EUROPE Liaison Unit Oslo, Norway, p 337Google Scholar
- Friis I, Demissew S, Breugel PV (2010) Atlas of the potential vegetation of Ethiopia. The Royal Danish Academy of Sciences and Letters, Denmark, p 307Google Scholar
- Graudal L, Kjaer E, Thomsen A, Larsen AB (1997) Planning national programmes for conservation of forest genetic resources. Technical Note No. 48, Danida Forest Seed Centre, Humlebaek, Denmark, p 54Google Scholar
- IUCN (2012) IUCN red list of threatened species. Version 2012.2. http://www.iucnredlist.org.
- König AO (2005) Provenance research: evaluating the spatial pattern of genetic variation. In: Geburek T, Turok J (eds) Conservation and management of forest genetic resources in Europe. Arbora Publishers, Zvolen, pp 535–565Google Scholar
- Lemenih L, Teketay D (2003) Frankincense and myrrh resources of Ethiopia. II. Medicinal and industrial uses. SINET Ethiop J Sci 26:161–172Google Scholar
- Ogbazghi W, Bongers F, Rijkers T, Wessel M (2006) Population structure and morphology of the frankincense tree Boswellia papyrifera along an altitude gradient in Eritrea. J Drylands 1:85–94Google Scholar
- Rotach P (2005) In situ conservation methods. In: Geburek T, Turok J (eds) Conservation and management of forest genetic resources in Europe. Arbora Publishers, Zvolen, pp 535–565Google Scholar
- Wright JW (1976) Introduction to forest genetics. Academic Press, New York, p 463Google Scholar