Skip to main content
Log in

Nutrient changes in potting mix and Eucalyptus nitens leaf tissue under macadamia biochar amendments

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Forestry Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effect of macadamia nut shell biochar on nitrogen, potassium, phosphorus, magnesium, calcium and sodium concentrations in potting mix used to grow Eucalyptus nitens seedlings was investigated in a glasshouse experiment. The treatments combined two fertiliser rates (50 and 100% rate of the commercial mix commonly used in forestry nurseries) with eight biochar rates (0, 2, 5, 10, 20, 50, 80 and 100 t ha−1) arranged in a randomised complete block with three replicates of four sample plants. Nutrients were quantified in the potting mix and seedling leaves at four destructive harvests 135, 177, 219 and 269 days after planting. Biochar significantly increased nitrate-N, Colwell P, Colwell K and exchangeable Na and reduced ammonium-N, Mg and Ca concentrations in the potting mix. Seedling leaf concentrations of P, K and Na were increased by biochar application, while N remained dependent on fertiliser rate only. Mg and Ca leaf concentrations decreased in response to increasing biochar rates. Elevated nitrate-N and decreased ammonium-N concentrations suggest that biochar might have increased nitrification in the potting mix. We presumed that biochar mediated processes that reduced uptake of P and K when high doses of biochar were combined with full fertilisation. Changes in potting mix K, Na, Mg and Ca were consistent with selective adsorption of ions to biochar surfaces.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bear FE (1965) Soils in relation to crop growth. Agricultural College and Experiment Station, Rutgers—the State University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA: Reinhold Publishing Corporation

  • Chan KY, Xu Z (2009) Biochar: Nutrient properties and their enhancement. In: Lehmann J, Joseph S (eds) Biochar for environmental management. Earthscan, London, pp 67–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan KY, Van Zwieten L, Meszaros I, Downie A, Joseph S (2007) Agronomic values of greenwaste biochar as a soil amendment. Aust J Soil Res 45(8):629

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chan KY, Van Zwieten L, Meszaros I, Downie A, Joseph S (2008) Using poultry litter biochars as a soil amendments. Aust J Soil Res 48:526–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones DL, Murphy DV, Khalid M, Ahmad W, Edwards-Jones G, DeLuca TH (2011) Short-term biochar-induced increase in soil CO2 release is both biotically and abiotically mediated. Soil Biol Biochem 43(8):1723–1731

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Klein RJT, Huq S, Denton F, Downing TE, Richels RG, Robinson JB, Toth FL (2007) Interrelationships between adaptation and mitigation. In: Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Cambridge University Press (ed) Contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge, pp 27–69

  • Lehmann J, Joseph S (2009) Biochar for environmental management, an introduction. Earthscan, London, pp 1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann J, Da Silva JP, Steiner C, Nehls T, Zech W, Glaser B (2003) Nutrient availability and leaching in an archaeological anthrosol and a Ferrasol of the Central Amazon basin: fertilizer, manure and charcoal amendments. Plant Soil 249:343–357

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ma YL, Matsunaka T (2013) Biochar derived from dairy cattle carcasses as an alternative source of phosphorus and amendment for soil acidity. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 59:628–641

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Major J, Rondon M, Molina D, Riha SJ, Lehmann J (2010) Maize yield and nutrition during 4 years after biochar application to a Colombian savanna oxisol. Plant Soil 333(1–2):117–128

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Manoa UoHa (2014) Soil-nutrient management for Maui Country. http://www.ctahr.hawaii.edu/mauisoil/c_relationship.aspx

  • McHenry MP (2009) Agricultural bio-char production, renewable energy generation and farm carbon sequestration in Western Australia: certainty, uncertainty and risk. Agr Ecosyst Environ 129(1–3):1–7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Milne E, Powlson DS, Cerri CE (2007) Soil carbon stocks at regional scales. Agr Ecosyst Environ 122(1):1–2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novak JM, Busscher WJ, Laird DL, Ahmedna M, Watts DW, Niandou MAS (2009) Impact of biochar amendment on fertility of a southeastern coastal plain soil. Soil Sci 174(2):105–112

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peverill KI, Sparrow LA, Reuter DJ (1999) Soil analysis: an interpretation manual. CSIRO Publishing, Australia, pp 12–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Reuter DJ, Robinson JB (1997) Plant analysis: an interpretation manual, 2nd edn. CSIRO Publishing, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Spokas KA, Baker JM, Reicosky DC (2010) Ethylene: potential key for biochar amendment impacts. Plant Soil 333(1–2):443–452

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stavi I (2013) Biochar use in forestry and tree-based agro-ecosystems for increasing climate change mitigation and adaptation. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol 20(2):166–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steiner C, Glaser B, Teixeira WG, Lehmann J, Blum WEH, Zech W (2008) Nitrogen retention and plant uptake on a highly weathered central Amazoniam ferrasol amended with compost and charcoal. Soil Sci 171:893–899

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas SC, Gale N (2015) Biochar and forest restoration: a review and meta-analysis of tree growth responses. New Forest 46:931–946

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNSW (2007) Soil properties: exchangeable cations. Accessed 2013

  • White PJ, Broadley MR (2003) Calcium in plants. Ann Bot 92:487–511

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wrobel-Tobiszewska A (2014) Biochar as a soil amendment and productivity stimulus for Eucalyptus nitens frestry plantations. University of Tasmania, online University database. Available 2015

  • Wrobel-Tobiszewska A, Boersma M, Sargison J, Close DC, Krull E, Adams P (2012) Macadamia biochar as a growth stimulus for Eucalyptus nitens forestry nurseries. Paper presented at the soil science conference, Hobart

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Wrobel-Tobiszewska.

Additional information

Project funding: The authors would like to thank Forestry Tasmania, BHP Billiton TEMCO Community Foundation, Tasmanian Community Fund, Centre for Renewable Energy and Power Systems (CREPS) and Rainbow Bee Eater Project for their support.

The online version is available at http://www.springerlink.com

Corresponding editor: Hu Yanbo.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 15 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wrobel-Tobiszewska, A., Boersma, M., Sargison, J. et al. Nutrient changes in potting mix and Eucalyptus nitens leaf tissue under macadamia biochar amendments. J. For. Res. 29, 383–393 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-017-0437-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-017-0437-0

Keywords

Navigation