Journal of Forestry Research

, Volume 25, Issue 4, pp 857–866 | Cite as

Wildland fires and moist deciduous forests of Chhattisgarh, India: divergent component assessment

  • B. H. Kittur
  • S. L. Swamy
  • S. S. Bargali
  • Manoj Kumar Jhariya
Original Paper


We studied moist deciduous forests of Chhattisgarh, India (1) to assess the effect of four levels of historic wildland fire frequency (high, medium, low, and no-fire) on regeneration of seedlings in fire affected areas during pre and post-fire seasons, (2) to evaluate vegetation structure and diversity by layer in the four fire frequency zones, (3) to evaluate the impact of fire frequency on the structure of economically important tree species of the region, and (4) to quantify fuel loads by fire frequency level. We classified fire-affected areas into high, medium, low, and no-fire frequency classes based on government records. Tree species were unevenly distributed across fire frequency categories. Shrub density was maximum in zones of high fire frequency and minimum in low-frequency and no-fire zones. Lower tree density after fires indicated that regeneration of seedlings was reduced by fire. The population structure in the high-frequency zone was comprised of seedlings of size class (A) and saplings of size class (B), represented by Diospyros melanoxylon, Dalbergia sissoo, Shorea robusta and Tectona grandis. Younger and older trees were more abundant for Tectona grandis and Dalbargia sissoo after fire, whereas intermediate-aged trees were more abundant prefire, indicating that the latter age-class was thinned by the catastrophic effect of fire. The major contributing components of fuel load included duff litter and small woody branches and twigs on the forest floor. Total fuel load on the forest floor ranged from 2.2 to 3.38 Mg/ha. The net change in fuel load was positive in high- and medium-frequency fire zones and negative under low- and no-fire zones. Repeated fires, however, slowly reduced stand stability. An ecological approach is needed for fire management to restore the no-fire spatial and temporal structure of moist deciduous forests, their species composition and fuel loads. The management approach should incorporate participatory forest management. Use of controlled fire, fire lines and mapping of fire prone areas are fundamental principles of fire hazard reduction in these areas.


forest fire diversity fuel load vegetation structure 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Arno SF. 1976. The historical role of fire on the Bitterroot National Forest. Research Patent INT-187, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Missoula, MT, 29 pp.Google Scholar
  2. Bargali SS, Rana BS, Rikhari HC, Singh RP. 1989. Population structure of Central Himalayan blue pine (Pinus wallichiana) forest. Environment and Ecology, 7: 431–436.Google Scholar
  3. Bargali SS, Tewari JC, Rawat YS, Singh SP. 1987. Woody vegetation in high elevation blue-pine mixed oak forest of Kumaun Himalaya, India. In: Y. P. S. Pangty and S. C. Joshi (eds.), Western Himalaya: Environment, Problems and Development. Gyanodaya Parakashan, Nainital. pp. 121–155.Google Scholar
  4. Champion HG, Seth SK. 1968. A Revised Survey of the Forest Types of India. New Delhi: Manager of Publications, Government of India, p.404.Google Scholar
  5. Clark JS. 1990. Fire and climate change during the last 750 years in northwestern Minnesota. Ecological Monographs, 60: 135–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Connell JH. 1978. Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs. Science, 199: 1302–1310.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Covington WW, Moore MM. 1994. Southwestern ponderosa forest structure, changes since Euro-American settlement. Journal of Forestry, 92: 39–47.Google Scholar
  8. Curtis JT, McIntosh RP. 1950. The interrelations of certain analytic and synthetic phytosociological characters. Ecology, 31: 434–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Danielle van OF, Markus H, Patrick de O Jan, Rein de W. 2005. Effect of tree species on within-forest distribution of understorey. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 18: 431–451.Google Scholar
  10. Gill M, Woinarski J, York A. 1999. Australia’s biodiversity responses to fire. Biodiversity technical report No. 1, Environment Australia.Google Scholar
  11. Gubbi S. 2003. Fire burning. Deccan Herald, daily news, Bangalore. India. Available at Scholar
  12. Hegde V, Chandran MD, Gadgil M. 1998. Variation in bark thickness in a tropical forest community of Western Ghats in India. Functional Ecology, 12: 313–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Schmerbeck J, Hiremath A. 2007. Forest fires in India: Dealing with the issue — The project, India. In: J. Schmerbeck, A. Hiremath, C Ravichandran (eds), Forest fires in India — Workshop proceedings. Madurai, India: Pillar Human Resource Development Centre, pp.5–8.Google Scholar
  14. Hörnburg L, Östlund L, Zackrisson O, Bergman I. 1999. The genesis of two Piceacladina forests in northern Sweden. Journal of Ecology, 87: 800–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jha CS. 1990. Land use and vegetation analysis of dry tropical forest region. Ph.D. Thesis, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India.Google Scholar
  16. Jhariya MK, Bargali SS, Swamy SL, Kittur B. 2012. Vegetational structure, diversity and fuel load in fire affected areas of tropical dry deciduous forests in Chhattisgarh. Vegetos, 25(1): 210–224.Google Scholar
  17. Knight DH. 1975. A phytosocioligical analysis of species-rich-tropical forest on Barro Colorado Island; Panama. Ecological Monograph, 45: 259–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Malamud BD, Morein G, Turcotte DL. 1998. Forest fires: an example of self-organized critical behavior. Science, 281: 1840–1842.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Marglef DR. 1958. Information theory in ecology. General Systems Yearbook, 3: 36–71.Google Scholar
  20. Miller M. 2000. Wildland fire in ecosystems, effects of fire on flora, Gen. Tech. Rep. Vol. 2. Ogden, UT, U.S. Department of Agriculture and Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, p.257.Google Scholar
  21. Molofsky J, Augspurger CK. 1992. The effect of leaf litter on early seedling establishment in a tropical forests. Ecology, 73(1): 68–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Naidu CV, Srivasuki KP. 1994. Effect of forest fire on tree species on different areas of Aeshachalam Hills. Journal of Tropical Forestry, 10(3): 56–64.Google Scholar
  23. Östlund L, Zackrisson O, Axelsson AL. 1997. The history and transformation of a Scandinavian boreal forest landscape since the 19th century. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 27: 1198–1206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Otto R, García-del-Rey E, Muñoz PG, Fernández-Palacios JM. The effect of fire severity on first-year seedling establishment in a Pinus canariensis forest on Tenerife, Canary Islands. European Journal of Forest Research, 129(4): 499–508.Google Scholar
  25. Phillips EA. 1959. Methods of Vegetation. New York, USA: Henry Holt and Claremont.Google Scholar
  26. Pielou EC. 1966. The measurement of diversity in different types of biological collections. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 13: 131–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rikhari HC, Bargali SS. 1989. Shrub layer composition in different forest ecosystems of Kumaun Himalaya. Vegetos, 2(2): 195–200.Google Scholar
  28. Saha S. 2002. Anthropogenic fire regime in a deciduous forest of central India. Current Science, 82(9): 1144–1147.Google Scholar
  29. Saxena AK, Singh JS. 1984. Tree population structure of central Himalayan forest associations and implications concerning their future composition. Vegetatio, 58(2): 61–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Schindele W, Thoma W, Panzer K. 1989. The forest fire 1982/3 in East Kalimantan Part 1: The fire, the effects, the damage and technical solutions. In: FR-Report No. 5. Investigation of the steps needed to rehabilitate the areas of East Kalimantan seriously affected by fire. Jakarta: German Forest Inventory Service Ltd. for German Agency for Technical Cooperation (GTZ) and International Tropical Timber Organization (ITTO).Google Scholar
  31. Shannon CE, Weaver W. 1963. The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Urbana, USA: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  32. Simpson EH. 1949. Measurment of diversity. Nature, 163: 688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Singh JS, Singh VK. 1992. Phenology of seasonally dry tropical forest. Current Science, 63(11): 684–689.Google Scholar
  34. Singh L, Puri S, Bargali SS. 2006. Biodiversity and importance of some lesser known woody species of Moist Deciduous Forest of Achanakmar-Amarkantak Biosphere Reserve. The Botanica, 56: 97–103.Google Scholar
  35. Swaine MD, Hall JB, Alexander CJ. 1987. Tree population dynamics at Kade, Ghana (1968–1982). Journal of Tropical Ecology, 3: 331–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Swamy SL, Dutt CBS, Murthy MSR, Mishra A, Bargali SS. 2010. Floristics and dry matter dynamics of Tropical Wet Evergreen Forests of Western Ghats, India. Current Science, 99(3): 353–364.Google Scholar
  37. Tripathi BC, Rikhari HC, Bargali SS, Rawat YS. 1991. Species composition and regeneration in disturbed forest sites in the oak zone in and around Nainital. Proceedings of Indian National Science Academy, B57: 381–390.Google Scholar
  38. Wanthongchai K, Goldammer JG, Bauhus J. 2010. Effects of fire frequency on prescribed fire behaviour and soil temperatures in dry dipterocarp forests. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 20(1): 35–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. West DC, Shugart Jr HH, Ranney JW. 1981. Population structure of forest cover in a large area in the boreal Swedish forest. Forest Science, 27: 701–710.Google Scholar
  40. Whittaker RH. 1972. Evolution and measurement of species diversity. Taxon, 21: 213–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Northeast Forestry University and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. H. Kittur
    • 1
  • S. L. Swamy
    • 2
  • S. S. Bargali
    • 3
  • Manoj Kumar Jhariya
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Silviculture & Agroforestry, College of ForestryKerala Agriculture UniversityVellanikara, ThrissureIndia
  2. 2.Department of Forestry, College of Agriculture, Indira Gandhi KrishiVishwavidyalayaRaipurIndia
  3. 3.Department of Botany, DSB CampusKumaun UniversityNainitalIndia

Personalised recommendations