Journal of Forestry Research

, Volume 25, Issue 1, pp 43–52 | Cite as

Estimating Pinus palustris tree diameter and stem volume from tree height, crown area and stand-level parameters

  • C. A. Gonzalez-Benecke
  • Salvador A. Gezan
  • Lisa J. Samuelson
  • Wendell P. CropperJr.
  • Daniel J. Leduc
  • Timothy A. Martin
Original Paper

Abstract

Accurate and efficient estimation of forest growth and live biomass is a critical element in assessing potential responses to forest management and environmental change. The objective of this study was to develop models to predict longleaf pine tree diameter at breast height (dbh) and merchantable stem volume (V) using data obtained from field measurements. We used longleaf pine tree data from 3,376 planted trees on 127 permanent plots located in the U.S. Gulf Coastal Plain region to fit equations to predict dbh and V as functions of tree height (H) and crown area (CA). Prediction of dbh as a function of H improved when CA was added as an additional independent variable. Similarly, predictions of V based on H improved when CA was included. Incorporation of additional stand variables such as age, site index, dominant height, and stand density were also evaluated but resulted in only small improvements in model performance. For model testing we used data from planted and naturally-regenerated trees located inside and outside the geographic area used for model fitting. Our results suggest that the models are a robust alternative for dbh and V estimations when H and CA are known on planted stands with potential for naturally-regenerated stands, across a wide range of ages. We discuss the importance of these models for use with metrics derived from remote sensing data.

Keywords

Longleaf pine diameter-height relationships crown area individual-tree stem volume growth and yield modeling 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andersen H-E, Reutebuch SE, McGaughey RJ. 2006. A rigorous assessment of tree height measurements obtained using airborne lidar and conventional field methods. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 32: 355–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baldwin VC, Saucier JR. 1983. Aboveground weight and volume of unthinned, planted longleaf pine on West Gulf forest sites. USDA Forest Service, Southern Forest Experiment Station, New Orleans, LA. Research Paper SO-191, p.25.Google Scholar
  3. Bi H, Fox JC, Li Y, Lei Y, Pang Y. 2012. Evaluation of nonlinear equations for predicting diameter from tree height. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 42:1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen X, Hutley LB, Eamus D. 2003. Carbon balance of a tropical savanna of northern Australia. Oecologia, 137: 405–416.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dalponte M, Bruzzone L, Gianelle D. 2011. System for the estimation of single-tree stem diameter and volume using multireturn LIDAR data. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 49: 2481–2490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dean TJ, Cao QV, Roberts SD, Evans DL. 2009. Measuring heights to crown base and crown median with LiDAR in a mature, even-aged loblolly pine stand. Forest Ecology and Management, 257: 126–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Drake JB, Weishampel JF. 2001. Simulating vertical and horizontal multifractal patterns of a longleaf pine savanna. Ecological Modelling, 145: 129–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fahey TJ, Woodbury PB, Battles JJ, Goodale CL, Hamburg SP, Ollinger SV, Woodall CW. 2010. Forest carbon storage: ecology, management, and policy. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 8:245–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fox DG. 1981. Judging air quality model performance. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 62: 599–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Goelz JC, Leduc DJ. 2001. Long-term studies on development of longleaf pine plantations. In: J. S. Kush (ed), Proceedings of the Third Longleaf Alliance Regional Conference, Forests for our Future, October 16–18, 2000, Alexandria, LA. The Longleaf Alliance and Auburn University, Auburn, AL, pp.116–118.Google Scholar
  11. Goldstein JH, Caldarone G, Duarte TK, Ennaanay D, Hannahs N, Mendoza G, Polasky S, Wolny S, Daily GC. 2012. Integrating ecosystem-service tradeoffs into land-use decisions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109: 7565–7570.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gonzalez-Benecke CA, Martin TA, Cropper Jr. WP, Bracho R. 2010. Forest management effects on in situ and ex situ slash pine forest carbon balance. Forest Ecology and Management, 260: 795–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gonzalez-Benecke CA, Martin TA, Jokela EJ, de la Torre R. 2011. A flexible hybrid model of life cycle carbon balance for loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) management systems. Forests, 2: 749–776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gonzalez-Benecke CA, Gezan SA, Leduc DJ, Martin TA, Cropper Jr. WP, Samuelson LJ. 2012. Modeling survival, yield, volume partitioning and their response to thinning for longleaf pine plantations. Forests, 3(4): 1104–1132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gonzalez-Benecke CA, Gezan SA, Martin TA, Cropper Jr. WP, Samuelson LJ, Leduc DJ. 2013. Individual tree diameter, height and volume functions for longleaf pine. Forest Science, dx.doi.org/10.5849/forsci.12-144.Google Scholar
  16. Gregoire TJ, Schabenberger O, Barrett JP. 1995. Linear modelling of irregularly spaced, unbalanced, longitudinal data from permanent-plot measurements. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 25:137–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jose S, Jokela E, Miller D. 2006. The longleaf pine ecosystem: An Overview. In: S. Jose, E. Jokela and D. Miller (eds), The longleaf pine ecosystem. Ecology, silviculture, and restoration. New York: Springer, pp 3–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kaboyashi K, Salam MU. 2000. Comparing simulated and measured values using mean squared deviation and its components. Agronomy Journal, 92: 345–352.Google Scholar
  19. Kalliovirta J, Tokola T. 2005. Functions for estimating stem diameter and tree age using tree height, crown width and existing stand database information. Silvae Fenica, 39: 227–248.Google Scholar
  20. Kaartinen H, Hyyppä J, Yu X, Vastaranta M, Hyyppä H, Kukko A, Holopainen M, Heipke C, Hirschmugl M, Morsdorf F, Næsset E, Pitkänen J, Popescu S, Solberg S, Wolf BM, Wu JC. 2012. An international comparison of individual tree detection and extraction using airborne laser scanning. Remote Sensing, 4: 950–974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Leduc D, Goelz J. 2009. A height-diameter curve for longleaf pine plantations in the Gulf Coastal Plain. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry, 33: 164–170.Google Scholar
  22. Lee H, Slatton KC, Roth BE, Cropper Jr. WP. 2009. Prediction of forest canopy light interception using three-dimensional airborne LiDAR data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 30: 189–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lee H, Slatton KC, Roth BE, Cropper Jr. WP. 2010. Adaptive clustering of airborne LiDAR data to segment individual tree crowns in managed pine forests. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 31: 117–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lefsky MA, Cohen WB, Parker GG, Harding DJ. 2002. Lidar remote sensing for ecosystem studies. Bioscience, 52:19–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Li W, Guo Q, Jakubowski MK, Kelly M. 2012. A new method for segmenting individual trees from the Lidar point cloud. Photogrametric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 78: 75–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Loague K, Green RE. 1991. Statistical and graphical methods for evaluating solute transport models: Overview and application. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 7: 51–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Loudermilk EL, Cropper Jr. WP, Mitchell RJ, Lee H. 2011. Longleaf pine and hardwood dynamics in a fire-maintained ecosystem: A simulation approach. Ecological Modelling, 222: 2733–2750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Luyssaert S, Schulze ED, Boerner A, Knohl A, Hessenmoeller D, Law BE, Ciais P, Grace J. 2008. Old-growth forests as global carbon sinks. Nature, 455: 213–215.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. McKinley DC, Ryan MG, Birdsey RA, Giardina CP, Harmon ME, Heath LS, Houghton RA, Jackson RB, Morrison JF, Murray BC, Pataki DE, Skog KE. 2011. A synthesis of current knowledge on forests and carbon storage in the United States. Ecological Applications, 21: 1902–1924.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Menaut JC, Cesar J. 1979. Structure and primary productivity of Lamto savannas, Ivory Coast. Ecology, 60: 1197–1210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Nakai Y, Hosoi F, Omasa K. 2010. Estimation of coniferous standing tree volume using airborne LiDAR and passive optical remote sensing. Journal of Agricultural Meteorology, 66: 111–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nelson R, Swill R, Krabill W. 1988. Using airborne lasers to estimate forest canopy and stand characteristics. Journal of Forestry, 86: 31–38.Google Scholar
  33. Neter J, Kutner MH, Wasserman W, Nachtsheim CJ. 1996. Applied linear statistical models. McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 4th edition. Irwin Series in Statistics, 770 pp.Google Scholar
  34. Nilsson M. 1996. Estimation of tree heights and stand volume using an airborne lidar system. Remote Sensing of Environment, 56: 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Popescu SC, Wynne RH, Nelson RF. 2003. Measuring individual tree crown diameter with lidar and assessing its influence on estimating forest volume and biomass. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 29: 564–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Popescu SC, Wynne RH. 2004. Seeing the trees in the forest: using LIDAR and multispectral data fusion with local filtering and variable window size for estimating tree height. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 70: 589–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Popescu SC. 2007. Estimating biomass of individual pine trees using airborne LiDAR. Biomass and Bioenergy, 31: 646–655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Putz FE, Zuidema PA, Pinard MA, Boot RGA, Sayer JA, Sheil D, Sist P, Elias, Vanclay JK. 2008. Improved tropical forest management for carbon retention. PLOS Biology, 6: 1368–1369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Roberts SD, Dean TJ, Evans DL, McCombs JW, Harrington RL, Glass PA. 2005. Estimating individual tree leaf area in loblolly pine plantations using LiDAR-derived measurements of height and crown dimensions. Forest Ecology and Management, 213: 54–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sawadogo L, Savadogo P, Tiveau D, Dayamba SD, Zida D, Nouvellet Y, Oden PC, Guinko S. 2010. Allometric prediction of above-ground biomass of eleven woody tree species in Sudanian savanna-woodland of West Africa. Journal of Forestry Research, 21: 475–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Satoo T, Madwick HAI. 1982. Forest Biomass. The Hague / Boston / London: Martinus Ni1hoff / Dr W. Junk Publishers, p.152.Google Scholar
  42. Snowdon P. 1991. A ratio estimator for bias correction in logarithmic regressions. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 21: 720–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tallis H, Polasky S. 2009. Mapping and valuing ecosystem services as an approach for conservation and natural-resource management. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1162: 265–283.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Thompson ID, Okabe K, Tylianakis JM, Kumar P, Brockerhoff EG, Schellhorn NA, Parrotta JA, Nasi R. 2011. Forest biodiversity and the delivery of ecosystem goods and services: translating science into policy. Bioscience, 61: 972–981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ulander LMH, Patrik BG, Hagberg JO. 1995. Measuring tree height using ERS-1 SAR Interferometry. In: Proceeding of Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium IGARSS’95, Florence, Italy, pp. 2189–2191.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Northeast Forestry University and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. A. Gonzalez-Benecke
    • 1
  • Salvador A. Gezan
    • 1
  • Lisa J. Samuelson
    • 2
  • Wendell P. CropperJr.
    • 1
  • Daniel J. Leduc
    • 3
  • Timothy A. Martin
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Forest Resources and ConservationUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA
  2. 2.School of Forestry and Wildlife SciencesAuburn UniversityAuburnUSA
  3. 3.USDA Forest Service, Southern Research StationAlexandria Forestry CenterPinevilleUSA

Personalised recommendations