Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Resource selection of moose (Alces alces cameloides) and their response to human disturbances in the northwestern slope of Lesser Khingan Mountains, northeastern China

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Forestry Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Moose (Alces alces cameloides) is typically representative of the fauna of the frigid temperate zone and has been put on the Chinese second priority list of protected animals. The moose of northeast China is on the southern most edge of its distribution in Asia. To study resource selection characteristics of moose and their response to human disturbances and forest resource variables, the field work was conducted in Heilongjiang Provincial Shengshan Forestry Farm, which is located in the northwestern slope of Lesser Khingan Mountains, northeastern China, from January to March in both 2006 and 2007. A total of 428 plots were examined within the study area. Signs of moose use were found in 19 plots. Based on the analysis of resource selection function, we found that moose selected areas with higher densities of mixed deciduous broadleaf patch and mixed coniferous and broad leaf patch, and a higher NDVI value. Moose avoided settlement 6 km away and remained low probability of occurrence within 3 km from roads, whereas higher within 4 km from trails. Our results suggested that the behavior of avoidance for human disturbance (i.e. settlement and roads) may indirectly pose habitat loss. Therefore, resource selection function models and corresponding graphs of important habitat disturbances can be used to guide and evaluate future development plans.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson DR, Burnham KP, Thompson WL. 2000. Null hypothesis testing: problems, prevalence, and an alternative. Journal of Wildlife Management, 64: 912–923.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey DW, Gross JE, Laca EA, Rittenhouse LRR, Coughenour MB, Swift DM, Sims PL. 1996. Mechanisms that result in large herbivore grazing distribution patterns. Journal of Range Management, 49: 386–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang H, Xiao QZ. 1988. The selection of red deer habitat in Dailing region during the winter. Acta Theriologica Sinica, 8: 81–88. (in Chinese with English summary)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cihlar J, Laurent LST, Dyer JA. 1991. Relation between the normalized difference vegetation index and ecological variables. Remote Sensing of the Environment, 35: 279–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen JA. 1960. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20: 37–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crist EP, Ciscone RC. 1984. Application of the tasseled cap concept to simulated thematic mapper data. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 50: 343–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csillag F, Fortin MJ, Dungan JL, 2000. On the limits and extensions of definition of scale. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, 81: 230–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Czech B. 1991. Elk behavior in response to human disturbance at Mt. St. Helens National Volcanic Monument. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 29: 269–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dale MRT. 2000. Lacunarity analysis of spatial pattern: a comparison. Landscape Ecology, 15: 467–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dempster JP, Pollard E. 1986. Spatial heterogeneity, stochasticity, and the detection of density dependence in animal populations. Oikos, 46: 413–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon BG. 1997. Cumulative effects modeling for grizzly bears in the greater Yellowstone Ecosystem. MSc Thesis, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana, USA: 15–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dugan J, Perry JN, Dale MRT, Legendre P, Citron-Pousty S, Fortin MJ, Jakomulska A, Miriti M, Rosenberg MS. 2002. A balanced view of scale in spatial statistical analysis. Ecography, 25: 626–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunning JB, Danielson BJ, Pulliam HR. 1992. Ecological processes that affect populations in complex landscapes. Oikos, 65: 169–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dussault C, Ouellet JP, Courtois R, Huot J, Breton L, Jolicoeur H. 2005. Linking moose habitat selection to limiting factors. Ecography, 28: 619–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ERDAS Inc. 2001. ERDAS IMAGINE 8.5 Tour Guides.

    Google Scholar 

  • ESRI (Environmental System Research Institute). 1996. Using ArcView GIS. ESRI, Inc., Redlands, Califonia, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fielding AH, Bell JF. 1997. A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models. Environmental Conservation, 24: 38–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fortin D, Fryxell J M, O’Brodovich L, Frandsen D. 2003. Foraging ecology of bison at the landscape and plant community levels: The applicability of energy maximization principles. Oecologia, 134: 219–227.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frid A. 2003. Dall’s sheep responses to overflights by helicopter and fixed-wing aircraft. Biological Conservation, 110: 387–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. 2000. Applied logistic regression. John Wiley and Sons, New York, USA.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ihaka R, Gentleman R. 1996. R: A language for data analysis and graphics. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 5: 299–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaeger JAG, Bowman J, Brennan J, Fahrig L, Bert D, Bouchard J, Charbonneau N, Frank K, Ruber B, Tluk von Toschanowitz K. 2005. Predicting when animal populations are at risk from roads: an interactive model of road avoidance behavior. Ecological Modelling, 185: 329–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaeger JAG, Fahrig L. 2004. Effects of road fencing on population persistence. Conservation Biology, 18: 1651–1657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang GS, Ma JZ, Zhang MH, Stott P. 2009. Multiple spatial scale resource selection function models in relation to human disturbance for moose in northeastern China. Ecological Research, 24: 423–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang GS, Ma JZ, Zhang MH, Stott P. 2010. Multi-scale foraging habitat use and interactions by sympatric cervids in northeastern China. Journal of Wildlife Management, 74: 678–689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang GS, Ma JZ, Zhang MH. 2006. Spatial distribution of ungulate responses to habitat factors in Wandashan Forest Region, northeastern China. Journal of Wildlife Management, 70: 1470–1476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang GS, Ma JZ, Zhang MH. 2007. Effects of human disturbance on movement, foraging and bed selection in red deer Cervus elaphus xanthopygus from the Wandashan Mountains, northeastern China. Acta Theriologica, 52: 435–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson CJ, Boyce MS, Case RL, Cluff HD, Gau RJ, Gunn A, Mulders R. 2005. Cumulative effects of human developments on Arctic wildlife. Wildlife Monographs, 160: 1–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson CJ, Boyce MS, Mulders R, Gunn A, Cluff HD, Case RL. 2004. Quantifying patch distribution at multiple spatial scales: application to wildlife-habitat models. Landscape Ecology, 19: 869–882.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keating KA, Cherry S. 2004. Use and interpretation of logistic regression in habitat selection studies. Journal of Wildlife Management, 68: 774–789.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lennart H. 2002. Mammal movements and foraging at remnant woodland inside coniferous forest landscape. Forest Ecology and Management, 160: 109–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li YZ, Xiao QZ, Chen HP. 1992. Interspecies relation among moose, red deer and roe deer during winter in Shengshan Forest Farm, Heilongjiang Province. Acta Theriologica Sinica, 2: 110–116. (in Chinese with English summary)

    Google Scholar 

  • Loyn RH, McNabb EG, Volodina L, Willig R. 2001. Modelling landscape distributions of large forest owls as applied to managing forests in north-east Victoria, Australia. Biological Conservation, 97: 361–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma YQ. 1989. Wildlife in Greater Khingan Mountains. Harbin, China: Northeast Forestry University Press, 79–93. (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mace RD, Waller JS, Manley TL, Lyon LJ, Zuuring H. 1996. Relationships among grizzly bears, roads and habitat in the Swan Mountains, Montana. Journal of Applied Ecology, 33: 1395–1404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney SP, Schaefer JA. 2002. Hydroelectric development and the disruption of migration in caribou. Biological Conservation, 107: 147–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maichak EJ. 2004. Applicability of viewshed analysis to wildlife population estimation. The American Midland Naturalist, 152: 277–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maier JAK, Ver Hoef JM, McGuire AD, Bowyer RT, Saperstein L, Maier HA. 2005. Distribution and density of moose in relation to landscape characteristics: effects of scale1. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 35: 2233–2243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manly BFJ, McDonald LL, Thomas DL, McDonald TL, Erickson WP (eds). 2002. Resource selection by animals. Second edition. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp.1–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menard S. 2001. Applied logistic regression analysis. Sage University Paper series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, series no.07-106. Thousand Oaks, California, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millspaugh JJ, Raedeke KJ, Brundige GC, Willmott CC. 1998. Summer bed sites of Elk (Cervus elaphus) in the Black Hills, South Dakota: considerations for thermal cover management. The American Midland Naturalist, 139: 133–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nellemann C, Cameron RD. 1998. Cumulative impacts of an evolving oil-field complex on the distribution of calving caribou. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 76: 1425–1430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen SE, Cranston J and Stenhouse GB. 2009. Identification of priority areas for grizzly bear conservation and recovery in Alberta, Canada. Journal of Conservation Planning, 5: 38–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norusis MJ. 1999. SPSS for Windows Regression Models. 9.0. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, p.135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ormsby T, Alvi J. 1999. Extension ArcView GIS. Redlands, Calif., USA: ESRI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce J, Ferrier S. 2000. Evaluating the predictive performance of habitat models developed using logistic regression. Ecological Modelling, 133: 225–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng CJ, Lee KL, Ingersoll GM. 2002. An introductionto logistic regression analysis and reporting. The Journal of Educational Research, 96: 3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piao RZ, Guang GS, Zhang MH. 1995. Population size and distribution of moose in China. Acta Theriologica Sinica, 15: 11–16. (in Chinese with English summary)

    Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team. 2006. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL http://www.R-project.org.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoen JW, Flynn RW, Suring LH, Trrus K, Beier LR. 1994. Habitat-capability model for brown bear in Southeast Alaska. Bears: Their Biology and Management, 9: 327–337. (In: proceedings of symposia of the International Conference for Bear Research and Management),.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stenseth NC. 1980. Spatial heterogeneity and population stability: some evolutionary consequences. Oikos, 35: 165–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens MA, Boness DJ. 2003. Influences of habitat features and human disturbance on use of breeding sites by a declining population of southern fur seals (Arctocephalus australis). Journal of Zoology, 260: 145–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suring LH, Barber KR, Schwartz CC, Bailey TN, Shuster WC, Tetreau MD. 1998. Analysis of cumulative effects on brown bears on Kenai Peninsula, southcentral Alaska. Ursus, 10: 107–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner MG, Dale VH, Gardner RH. 1989. Predicting across scales: theory development and testing. Landscape Ecology, 3: 245–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vistnes I, Nellemann C. 2001. Avoidance of cabins, roads, and power lines by reindeer during calving. Journal of Wildlife Management, 65: 915–925.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang J, Robinson GJ, Wiitie K. 1996. A fast solution to local viewshed computation using grid based digital elevation models. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 62: 1157–1164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang S. 1998. China red data book of endangered animals: Mammalia. Beijing, Hongkong, New York: Science Press, pp.246–249. (in both Chinese and English)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson BA, Aberton JG, Reichl T. 2001. Effects of fragmented habitat and fire on the distribution and ecology of the swamp antechinus (Antechinus minimus maritimus) in the eastern Otways?. Victoria Wildlife Research, 28: 527–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wisdom MJ, Cook JG. 2000. North American elk. In: S. Demarais, and P.R. Krausman (eds), Ecology and management of large mammals in North America. Prentice-Hall Incorpotated, Upper Saddle River, pp.694-735

  • Yu XC, Xiao QZ, Lu YM. 1993. Selection and utilization ratio of winter diet, and seasonal changes in feeding and bedding habitat selection by moose in northeastern China. In: N. Ohtaishi and H.L. Sheng (eds), Deer of China: biology and management. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers, pp.172–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu XC, Xiao QZ. 1991. The food composition and seasonal change of the moose in Heihe Forest Area. Acta Theriologica Sinica, 11: 258–265. (In Chinese with English summary)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang MH, Xiao QZ. 1990. A study on feeding and bedding habitat selection by red deer in winter. Acta Theriologica Sinica, 10: 175–183. (in Chinese with English summary)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang MH. 2001. Wintering habitat selection by moose cold temperate zone, The Great Khingan Mountains. Acta Theriologica Sinica, 21: 310–313. (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Library of Northeast Forestry University, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin, P.R. China

    Su-xian Hu

  2. College of Wildlife Resources, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin, P.R. China

    Guang-shun Jiang, Jian-zhang Ma, Ming-hai Zhang & Hui Liu

Authors
  1. Su-xian Hu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Guang-shun Jiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jian-zhang Ma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ming-hai Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Hui Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guang-shun Jiang.

Additional information

Fund project: This work was financially supported by National Excellent Doctoral Dissertation of PR China-FANEDD (No. 201069)”, “Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University -NCET (No. 10-0310)” and “the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No.DL12DA01).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hu, Sx., Jiang, Gs., Ma, Jz. et al. Resource selection of moose (Alces alces cameloides) and their response to human disturbances in the northwestern slope of Lesser Khingan Mountains, northeastern China. Journal of Forestry Research 24, 727–734 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-013-0411-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-013-0411-4

Key words

Search

Navigation