Abstract
We examined the local community incentive programs to improve traditional forest management in three forested villages in Baneh city, Kurdistan province in the northern Zagros forests of western Iran. Zagros forests cover 6.07 million ha and support rich plant and animal diversity. Changes in local community social and economic systems and the inefficiency of traditional forest management led to a critical situation in the stability of forest regeneration in recent decades. Due to a shortage of productive and arable lands and resulting unemployment and poverty, people overexploited the Zagros forests. Outside intervention in traditional forest management creates conflicts between local peoples and forest management organizations. To achieve sustainable forest management, including forest resources conservation and improvement of natural resource based livelihoods of communities, it is desirable to implement Forestry Incentive Programs (FIP) based on the important functions of forests. Detailed information on the socio-economics of communities, the effect of forests on local livelihoods, and lists of products extracted from the forest were obtained from a survey of local communities though questionnaire, interview and observation. We studied 276 households in three villages and completed 76 questionnaires by householders in the quantitative analysis. Sampling was performed by simple random sampling (SRS). The needs of rural communities, such as livestock husbandry, mainly arise from the characteristics and environmental features of villages. We identified the driving forces, pressures, status, impacts and responses (DPSIR) to design incentive programs, by DPSIR analysis and interaction analysis. Evaluation of local community benefits from forests showed that in order to improve forest management, 319 dollars per year would be needed by each family as an incentive in 2010 to prevent lopping and firewood collecting, the main causes of forest degradation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.References
Adams JS, McShane TO. 1992. The myth of wild Africa: Conservation without illusion. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Arun A, Ostrom E. 2001. Collective action, property rights and decentralization in resource use in India and Nepal. Politics and Society, 29(4): 485–514.
Boyd R. 1984. Government support of nonindustrial production: the case of private forests. Southern Economic Journal, 51(1): 89–107.
Bromley Daniel W, David F, Margaret M, Pauline P, Jere G, Ronald O, Runge CF, Thomson J. 1992. Making the Commons Work: Theory, Practice, and Policy. San Francisco, CA: ICS Press.
Bruce SA, Mark B, George SH. 2002. Social acceptability of forest conditions and management practices: A problem analysis. General Technical Report (PNW-GTR-537), U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, p. 68.
Church A, Ravenscroft N. 2008. Landowner responses to financial incentive schemes for recreational access to woodlands in South East England. Land Use Policy, 25(1): 1–16
Colfer CJP, Brocklesby MA, Diaw C, Etuge P, Gunter M, Harwell E, McDougall C, Porro NM, Porro R, Prabhu R, Salim A, Sardjono MA, Tchikangwa B, Tiani AM, Wadley RL, Woelfel J, Wollenberg E. 1999. The BAG (Basic Assessment Guide for Human Well-Being), C&I Toolbox Series No. 5. CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia.
Department of Environment, Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran (DOE/GOIRI). 2004. Conservation of Biodiversity in the Central Zagros Landscape Conservation Zone. Zagros Project Office. Available at: http://www.irandoe.org/zagros/Docs/Doc28.pdf
Ebrahimi-rastaghi M. 2000. The rule of baneh (pistacia atlantica) in management of beyond northern Iranian forests. FRO, technical report. p. 20. (In Persian)
Fattahi M. 1995. The rule of public participations on restoration of Zagross forests. Research institute of forest and rangelands. Technical report. p. 23. (In Persian)
Geisler C, Stycos JM, Warne R, Maid GK. 1996. Towards environmentally and socially sustainable land reform in the Dominican Republic. A paper submitted in Partial Fulfilment of GEF-Year-End Report Project No. DOM/94/G31.
Ghazanfari H, Namiranian M, Sobhani H, Mohajer RM. 2004. Traditional forest management and its application to encourage participation for sustainable forest management in the northern mountains of Kurdistan province, Iran. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 19: 65–71.
Guthiga P, Mburu J. 2006. Local communities incentives for forest conservation: Case of Kakamega Forest in Kenya, A Paper Presented at the 11th Biannual Conference of International Association for the Study of Common Property (IASCP) Bali, Indonesia June 19th to June 23rd 2006.
Hardie I, Parks P. 1996. Program enrollment and acreage response to reforestation cost-sharing programs. Land Economics, 72(2): 248–260.
Hoekstra TW, Shachak M. 1999. Arid Lands Management: Toward Ecological Sustainability. Illustrated edition. Urbana University of Illinois Press.
Hutton JM, Leader-Williams N. 2003. Sustainable use and incentive-driven conservation: realigning human and conservation interests. Oryx, 37(2): 215–226.
Jamshidiyan S. 2003. Report of conventional ownerships. project of traditional forest management in Havareh khol. Joint project of Daumoon (local NGO) with UNDP-GEF/SGP (the Project Number: IRA-2002-018 (IRA98G52). (In Persian)
Jazirehi MH, Ebrahimi M. 2003. Silviculture in Zagros (1st edition). Tehran: University of Tehran Press (in Persian).
Kant S. 2000. A Dynamic Approach to Forest Regimes in Developing Economies. Ecological Economics, 32(2): 287–300.
Kim CW, Phipps TT, Anselin L. 1998. Measuring the benefits of air quality improvement: A spatial hedonic approach. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 45(1): 24–39.
Kluender RA, Walkingstick TL, Pickett JC. 1999. The use of forestry incentives by nonindustrial forest landowner groups: is it time for a reassessment of where we spend our tax dollars? Natural Resources Journal, 39(4): 799–818.
Menitsky YL. 2005. Oaks of Asia. Enfield, NH: Science Publishers, p.549
Ostrom E. 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Pourhashemi M, Mohajer MRM, Zobeiri M, Amiri GZ, Panah P. 2004. Identification of forest vegetation units in support of government management objectives in Zagros forests, Iran. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 19(Suppl. 4): 72–77.
Sagheb-Talebi K, Sajedi T, Yazdian F. 2004. Forests of Iran. Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands, Iran. (in Persian with English Summary)
Salehi A. 2009. Livelihood Dependency and Management on Semiarid Oak Forests, Doctoral Thesis. Umeå: Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences.
Sun X, Sun CY, Munn IA, Hussain A. 2009. Knowledge of three regeneration programs and application behavior among Mississippi. Journal of Forest Economics, 15(3): 187–204.
Vacik H, Wolfslehner B, Seidl R, Lexer MJ. 2006. Integrating the DPSIR-Approach and the analytic network process for the assessment of forest management strategies, USDA Forest Service. General Technical Report PNW, No. 688.
Wintrobe R. 1997. Modern bureaucratic theory. In: Mueller DC (Ed.), Perspectives on Public Choice: A Handbook. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Khalyani, J.H., Namiranian, M., Heshmatol Vaezin, S.M. et al. Development and evaluation of local communities incentive programs for improving the traditional forest management: A case study of Northern Zagros forests, Iran. Journal of Forestry Research 25, 205–210 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-013-0399-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-013-0399-9