Abstract
Eucalyptus plantations are increasing in Brazil, frequently replacing pastures, but there is still scarce information about its capacity to maintain the fauna of neighbor forest remnants. In this study, we compared descriptors of the communities of leaf litter organisms (lizards, anurans, myriapods, arachnids, orthopterans, coleopterans, and ants) between a large remnant of primary Atlantic Forest and an adjacent eucalyptus monoculture (phase 1). Then, we compared the same descriptors for leaf litter lizards and anurans, Euglossini bees, and frugivorous butterflies among the largest remnant, small remnants at intermediate regeneration stage, and eucalyptus monocultures that were not adjacent to the largest remnant (phase 2). Monocultures were sampled immediately before logging. In phase 1, we detected significant differences in structure between the forest and the monoculture in six out of seven communities sampled. Ca. 81% of the species of the landscape were recorded in the forest, but only 54% of these were found also in the monoculture. In phase 2, the structure of two out of four forest communities was significantly different from the structure of small remnants and monocultures. On average, 76% of the species found in the whole landscape were sampled in the forest. Out of this subset, on average 74% of the species were also sampled in small remnants and 68% in monocultures. Findings of the present study point out a moderate capacity of eucalyptus monocultures to harbor species of the forest fauna even when fully grown but highlights the opportunity that they might offer for increasing connectivity in anthropogenic forest landscapes depending on their management
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ABRAF 2008. Anuário estatístico da ABRAF: ano base 2007. Associação Brasileira de Produtores de Florestas Plantadas, Brasília.
Aide TM, Zimmerman JK, Pascarella JB, Rivera L, Marcano-Vega H. 2000. Forest regeneration in a chronosequence of tropical abandoned pastures: Implications for restoration ecology. Restoration Ecology. 8: 328–338.
Barlow J, Gardner TA, Araujo IS, Ávila-Pires TC, Bonaldo AB, Costa JE, Esposito MC, Ferreira LV, Hawes J, Hernandez MIM, Hoogmoed MS, Leite RN, Lo-Man-Hung NF, Malcolm JR, Martins MB, Mestre LAM, Miranda-Santos R, Nunes-Gutjahr AL, Overal WL, Parry L, Peters SL, Ribeiro-Junior MA, da Silva MNF, da Silva MNF, C, Peres CA. 2007. Quantifying the biodiversity value of tropical secondary, and plantation forests. PNAS, 104(47): 18555–18560.
Coimbra-Filho AF, Câmara IG. 1996. Os limites originais do Bioma Mata Atlântica na região nordeste do Brasil. Fundação Brasileira para a Conservação da Natureza, Rio de Janeiro.
Costa MGC. 2004. Comparação da microfauna de vertebrados e artrópodes cursores de serrapilheira em região de Mata Atlântica e monocultura de eucalipto no sul da Bahia. Dissertação de Mestrado, PPG Ecologia e Biomonitoramento, Universidade Federal da Bahia.
Dantas TB. 2004. Influência da fragmentação florestal e da qualidade da matriz de monocultura de eucalipto sobre a composição das comunidades de vertebrados de folhiço em áreas de Mata Atlântica no extremo sul da Bahia. Dissertação de Mestrado, PPG Ecologia e Biomonitoramento, Universidade Federal da Bahia.
Dean W. 1998. A ferro e fogo, a história da devastação da Mata Atlântica brasileira. Companhia das Letras, São Paulo.
DeVries PJ. 1987. The butterflies of Costa Rica and their natural history: Papilionidae, Pieridae, and Nymphalidae. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Dunn RR. 2004. Recovery of faunal communities during tropical forest regeneration. Conservation Biology, 18: 302–309.
FAO 2001. State of the World’s forests. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.
Fonseca CR, Ganade G, Baldissera R, Becker CG, Boelter CR, Brescovit AD, Campos LM, Fleck T, Fonseca VS, Hartz SM, Joner F, Kaffer MI, Leal-Zanchet AM, Marcelli MP, Mesquita AS, Mondin CA, Paz CP, Petry MV, Piovesan FN, Putzke J, Stranz A, Vergara M, Vieira EM. 2009. Towards an ecologically-sustainable forestry in the Atlantic Forest. Biological Conservation, 142: 1209–1219.
Gascon C, Lovejoy, TE, Bierregaard RO, Malcolm JR, Stouffer PC, Vasconcelos HL, Laurance WF, Zimmerman B, Tocher M, Borges S. 1999. Matrix habitat and species richness in tropical forest remnants. Biological Conservation, 91(2–3): 223–229.
Guerrero AC, Rocha PLB. 2010. Passive restoration in biodiversity hotspots: consequences for an Atlantic Rainforest lizard taxocenose. Biotropica, 42(3): 379–387.
Lindenmayer DB, Hobbs RJ. 2004. Fauna conservation in Australian plantation forests — a review. Biological Conservation, 119: 151–168.
McCune B, Grace JB. (eds.) 2002. Analysis of Ecological Communities. MJM Software, Oregon.
Melo AMC. 2005. Gradientes ambientais e a comunidade de abelhas Euglossina (Hymenoptera, Apidae) em fragmentos de Mata Atlântica intercalados por uma matriz de eucaliptais no extremo sul da Bahia. Dissertação de Mestrado, PG Ecologia e Biomonitoramento, Universidade Federal da Bahia.
Neves EL, Viana BF. 1997. Inventário da fauna de Euglossinae (Hymenoptera, Apidae) do baixo sul da Bahia, Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia, 14(4): 831–837.
Pardini R, Faria D, Accacio GM, Laps RR, Mariano-Neto E, Paciência MLB, Dixo M, Baumgarten J. 2009. The challenge of maintaining Atlantic Forest biodiversity: A multi-taxa conservarion assessment of specialist and generalist species in as agro-forestry mosaic in southern Bahia. Biological Conservation, 142: 1178–1190.
Prugh LR, Hodgesb KE, Sinclairc ARE, Brashares JS. 2008. Effect of habitat area and isolation on fragmented animal populations. PNAS, 105: 20770–20775.
Quinn G & Keough M. 2002. Experimental design and data analysis for biologists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Redi BH, Van Aarde RJ, Wassenaar TD. 2005. Coastal dune forest development and the regeneration of millipede communities. Restoration Ecology, 13: 284–291.
Rey Benayas JM, Bullock JM, Newtin AC. 2008. Creating woodland islets to reconcile ecological restoration, conservation, and agricultural land use. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 6(6): 329–336.
Saunders DA, Hobbs RJ, Margules CR. 1991. Biological consequences of ecosystem fragmentation: a review. Conservation Biology, 5(1): 18–32.
SBS. 2007. Fatos e números do Brasil Florestal. Sociedade Brasileira de Silvicultura.
Thomas WMW, Cavalho AMV, Amorim AMA, Garison J, Arbelaez AL. 1998. Plant endemism in two forests in southern Bahia, Brasil. Biodiversity and Conservation, 7: 311–322.
Vandermeer J & Carvajal R. 2001. Metapopulation dynamics and the quality of the matrix. The American Naturalist, 158: 211–220.
Vasconcelos RN. 2008. Estrutura da comunidade de borboletas frugívoras em fragmentos de Floresta Atlântica e em plantações de eucalipto no extremo Sul da Bahia. Dissertação de Mestrado, PG Ecologia e Biomonitoramento, Universidade Federal da Bahia.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The online version is available at http://www.springerlink.com
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
da Rocha, P.L.B., Viana, B.F., Cardoso, M.Z. et al. What is the value of eucalyptus monocultures for the biodiversity of the Atlantic forest? A multitaxa study in southern Bahia, Brazil. Journal of Forestry Research 24, 263–272 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-012-0311-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-012-0311-z