Skip to main content
Log in

Biohydrogen production with anaerobic sludge immobilized by granular activated carbon in a continuous stirred-tank

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Forestry Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A continuous stirred-tank reactor (CSTR) process with granular activated carbon (GAC) was developed for fermentation hydrogen production from molasses-containing wastewater by mixed microbial cultures. Operation at 35°C, an initial biomass of 17.74 g·L−1 and hydraulic retention time (HRT) of 6 h, the CSTR reactor presented a continuous hydrogen production ability of 5.9 L·d−1 and the biogas was free of methane throughout the experiment. Dissolved fermentation products were predominated by ethanol and acetate acid, with smaller quantities of propionic acid, butyric acid and valeric acid. It was found that GAC could make the immobilized system durable and stable in response to organic load impacting and low pH value. When the organic loading rate (OLR) ranged from 8 kgCOD/(m3d) to 4 kgCOD/(m3d), stable ethanol-type fermentation was formed, and the ethanol and acetate concentrations account for 89% of the total liquid products.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Benemann J. 1996. Hydrogen biotechnology: progress and prospects. Nat Biotechnol, 14: 1101–1103.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Das D, Veziroglu TN. 2001. Hydrogen production by biological process: a survey of literature. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 26:13–28.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gavala HN, Skiadas IV, Ahring BK. 2006. Biological hydrogen production in suspended and attached growth anaerobic reactor systems. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 31: 1164–1175.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Han SK, Shin HS. 2004. Biohydrogen production by anaerobic fermentation of food waste. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 29: 569–577

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jin B, Van Leeuwen HJ, Patel B, Yu Q. 1998. Utilization of starch processing wastewater for production of microbial biomass protein and fungal α-amylase by aspergillus oryzae. Bioresource Technology, 66: 201–206.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kataoka N, Miya A, Kiriyama K. 1997. Studies on hydrogen production by continuous culture system of hydrogen producing anaerobic bacteria. Water Sci Technol, 36: 41–47.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim JO, Kim YH, Ryu JY, Song BK, Kim IH, Yeom SH. 2005. Immobilization methods for continuous hydrogen gas production biofilm formation versus granulation. Process Biochem, 40: 1331–1337.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lee DY, Li YY, Noike T, Cha GC. 2008. Behavior of extracellular polymers and bio-fouling during hydrogen fermentation with a membrane bioreactor. Journal of Membrane Science, 322(1): 13–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lee KS, Wu JF, Lo, YS, Lo YC, Lin PJ, Chang JS. 2004. Anaerobic hydrogen production with an efficient carrier-induced granular sludge bed bioreactor. Biotechnol Bioeng, 87: 648–657.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Levin DB, Pitt L, Love M. 2004. Biohydrogen production: prospects and imitations to practical application. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 29(2): 173–185.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Logan BE, Oh SE, Kim IS, Van Ginkel S. 2002. Biological hydrogen production measured in batch anaerobic respirometers. Environ Sci Technol, 36: 530–2535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patrick CH, Benemann JR. 2000. Biological hydrogen production: fundamentals and limiting process. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 27: 1185–1193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ren N, Qin Z, Li J. 2003. Comparision and Analysis of Hydrogen Production Capacity with Different Acidogenic Fermentative Microflora. Environmental Science, 24(1): 70–74.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tao Y, Chen Y, Wu Y, He Y, Zhou Z. 2007. High hydrogen yield from a two-step process dark and photo-fermentation of sucrose. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 32(2): 200–206.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Teplyakow VV, Gassanova LG, Sostina EG, Slepova EV, Modigell M, et al., Netrusov AI. 2002. Lab-scale bioreactor integration with active membrane system for hydrogen production:experience and prospects. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 27(11–12): 1149–11551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ueno Y, Otsuka S. Morimoto M. 1996. Hydrogen production from industrial wastewater by anaerobic microflora in chemostat culture. Journal of Fermentation and Bioengineering, 83: 194–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu SY, Lin CN, Chang JS. 2003. Hydrogen production with immobilized sewage sludge in three-phase fluidized-bed bioreactors. Biotechnol Prog, 9(3): 828–832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yong-feng Li.

Additional information

Foundation project: This study was supported by the National Hi-Tech R&D Program (863 Program), Ministry of Science&Technology, China (Grant No. 2006AA05Z109) and Shanghai Science and Technology Bureau (Grant No.071605122) and Educated programme of excellent doctor of Southeast Forestry University (GRAP09)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Han, W., Chen, H., Yao, X. et al. Biohydrogen production with anaerobic sludge immobilized by granular activated carbon in a continuous stirred-tank. Journal of Forestry Research 21, 509–513 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-010-0107-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-010-0107-y

Keywords

Navigation