Abstract
The composite board industry in Iran is obliged to use residues from forest operation as well as wood industry for competing with paper industry because of shortage of wood. In the present study we investigated the residues from poplar plantation used for particleboard production. Three kinds of wood materials, poplar branches, small diameter poplar wood (3–8 cm) and beech wood, were used in the experiment of particleboard production. The results demonstrated that the characteristic of particleboard made from poplar branches and small diameter wood is comparable to that made from mature beech wood. To avoid too much residual acid in the final board, the properties of boards produced with 1.5% hardener at 175°C press temperature are acceptable, although the properties of particleboard produced with 2% hardener were higher than were higher than that of the board produced with lower hardener (1% or 1.5%).. The MOR, MOE and IB of particleboard made from branches were measured as 14.57, 2015, and 1.32 MPa, respectively, while The MOR, MOE and IB of particleboard produced from small diameter poplar wood were 19.90, 2199, and 1.86 MPa, respectively. The thickness swelling of boards made from branches after 2 and 24 h immersion in water was 20.14% and 31.26%. The utilization of branches and very small diameter wood of poplar is recommended for the survival and developments of particleboard industry in Iran.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aguilar P, Yglesias L. 2008. Optimization of the physical-mechanical properties of three-Layer agricultural particleboard made in Peru. In; Proc Int Panel Products Symposium, 223–229.
Blanchet P, Cloutier A, Riedl B. 2000. Particleboard made from hammer milled black dpruce bark residues. Wood Science and Technology, 34(1): 11–19.
European Standard EN310/1996, EN319/1996, EN317/1996: CEN European Committee for Standardization.
Jahan LA, Hossienzadeh AR, Nourbakhsh A, Karagarfard A, Golbabaei F. 1996. Investigation on the properties of particleboard from date palm residues. Journal of Wood and Paper Research, No.1: 49–109.
Grigoriou AH. 1998. Straw as an alternative raw material for the surface layers of particleboard. In: Proceeding of the second Panel Products Symposium, Llandudno, Wales, UK, 1998, pp: 133–141.
Hague J, Loxton C, Quinnary R, Hobson N. 1997. Assessment of the suitability of agro-based material for panel products. In: Proceeding of the First European panel Prducts Symposium, Liandudno, Wales, UK, 1997, pp:136–144.
Jahan Latibari A, Hossienzadeh AR, Nourbakhsh A, Karagarfard A, Golbabaei F. 1996. Investigation on the properties of particleboard from date palm residues. Journal of Wood and Paper Research, No.1: 49–109.
Johns WE, Niazi KA. 1980. Effect of pH and buffering capacity on the gelation time of urea formaldehyde resin. Wood and Fiber, 12(4): 255–263.
Kalaycioglu K, Hemli G. 2005. Producing composite particleboard from kenaf (Hebicus canabinus L.) stalks. Ind Crops Prod, 24: 177–180.
McLauchlin, A.R., and Hague, J. R.B., 1998. Panel products from UF-bonded non-wood fibers-A viable proposition? In: Proceeding of the Second panel Products Symposium, Llandudno, Wales, UK, 1998, pp 142–152.
Meinlschmidt P, Schrip A, Dix B, Thole V, Brinker N. 2008. Agricultural residues with light parenchyma cells and expandable filler material for the production of lightweight particleboard. In: Proc. Int. Panel Products Sym posium, 179–188.
Natals G, Grigoriou A. 2002. Characterization and utilzation of vine pruning as a wood substitute for particleboard. Ind Crops Prod, 16(1): 59–67.
Nemli G, Kirli H, Serdar B, Ay N. 2003. Suitability of kiwi pruning for particleboard manufacturing. Ind Crops Prod, 17(1): 143–147
Nourbakhsh A. 2008: Mechanical and thickness swelling of particleboard composites made from three-year-old poplar colones. Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, In Press, Doi: 10.1177/0731684408097771.
Pan Z, Catheart A, Wang D. 2006. Properties of particleboard bond with rice bran and polymeric methylene diphenyl diisocyanate Ahesives. Ind Crops Prod, 15(1): 43–50.
Pedieu R, Riedl B, Pichette B. 2007. Measurement of wood and bark particles acidity and their impact on the curing of urea-formaldehyde resin during hot pressing of mixed panels. Holz Roh Werkst, 66: 113–117.
Pinto B, Pereira J, Martins J, Carvalho L. 2008. Effect of recycled wood on the performance of particleboard. In: Proc Int Panel Prod Symposium, 299–308.
Ratnasinggan J, Farrokhpayam SR, Murughan M. 2008. Oil palm biomass: A potential fiber source for the composite industry. In: Proceeding of the International Panel Products Symposium, 2008. Espoo, Finland, pp: 315–320.
Wang D, Sun XS. 2002. Low density particleboard from wheat straw and corn pith: Ind Crops Prod, 15(1): 43–50.
Xu W, Suchsland O.1998. Variability of particleboard properties from single and mixed species processes. For Prod J, 48(9): 68–74.
Xu J, Widyorini R, Kawai S. 2005. Properties of kenaf core binderless particleboard reinforced with kenaf bast fiber woven sheets. J of Wood Sci, 51(4): 415–420.
Yang TH, Lin LT, Lin CJ, Wang SY, Tsai MJ. 2007. Characteristics of particleboard made from recycled wood-waste chips impregnated with phenolformaldehyde resins. Building and Environment, 21(1): 189–195.
Yu C, Fan M, Brown V, Crymp D. 2007. Evaluation of emissions and physical characteristics of recycled wood panel products made from treated with new type of wood preservatives: In: Proc. COST Action E49 Conference Measurement and Control of VOC Emissions from Wood Based Panels. Brunschweing, Germany, 28–29 November 2007.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jahan-Latibari, A., Roohnia, M. Potential of utilization of the residues from poplar plantation for particleboard production in Iran. Journal of Forestry Research 21, 503–508 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-010-0106-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-010-0106-z