Skip to main content
Log in

Biomass estimation of Shorea robusta with principal component analysis of satellite data

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Forestry Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Spatio-temporal assessment of the above ground biomass (AGB) is a cumbersome task due to the difficulties associated with the measurement of different tree parameters such as girth at breast height and height of trees. The present research was conducted in the campus of Birla Institute of Technology, Mesra, Ranchi, India, which is predominantly covered by Sal (Shorea robusta C. F. Gaertn). Two methods of regression analysis was employed to determine the potential of remote sensing parameters with the AGB measured in the field such as linear regression analysis between the AGB and the individual bands, principal components (PCs) of the bands, vegetation indices (VI), and the PCs of the VIs respectively and multiple linear regression (MLR) analysis between the AGB and all the variables in each category of data. From the linear regression analysis, it was found that only the NDVI exhibited regression coefficient value above 0.80 with the remaining parameters showing very low values. On the other hand, the MLR based analysis revealed significantly improved results as evidenced by the occurrence of very high correlation coefficient values of greater than 0.90 determined between the computed AGB from the MLR equations and field-estimated AGB thereby ascertaining their superiority in providing reliable estimates of AGB. The highest correlation coefficient of 0.99 is found with the MLR involving PCs of VIs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Crippen RE. 1990. Calculating the vegetation index faster. Remote Sensing of Environment, 34: 71–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong J, Kaufmann RK, Myneni RB, Tucker CJ, Kauppi PE, Liski J, Buermann W, Alexeyev V, Hughes MK. 2003. Remote sensing estimates of boreal and temperate forest woody biomass: carbon pools, sources, and sinks. Remote Sensing of Environment, 84: 393–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser RH, Li Z. 2002. Estimating fire-related parameters in boreal forest using SPOT VEGETATION. Remote Sensing of Environment, 82: 95–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huete AR. 1988. A soil-adjusted vegetation index (SAVI). Remote Sensing of Environment, 25(3): 295–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen JR. 2006 (2nd Edition). Remote Sensing of the Environment: An Earth Resource Perspective. South Carolina: Prentice Hall, 592pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar R. 1999. Characterization of Rice Growing Ecosystem Using Remote Sensing and GIS Techniques. Ph.D. Thesis (unpublished), Birsa Agricultural University, Ranchi, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefsky MA, Cohen WB., Spies TA. 2001. An evaluation of alternate remote sensing products for forest inventory, monitoring, and mapping of Douglasfir forests in western Oregon. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 31(1): 78–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levesque J, King DJ. 1999. Airborne digital camera image semivariance for evaluation of forest structural damage at an acid mine site. Remote Sensing of Environment, 68: 112–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lillesand TM, Kiefer RW, Chipman JW. 2007 (6th Edition). Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation. Madison: John Wiley & Sons, 784pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu D. 2006. The potential and challenge of remote sensing-based biomass estimation. International Journal of Remote Sensing, vol. 27(7): 1297–1328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Majumdar A. 2010. Biomass Estimation of Sal (Shorea robusta) through Principal Component Analysis of Satellite Data. M.Sc. Thesis (unpublished), Birla Institute of Technology Mesra, Ranchi, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson AJ, Wiegand CL. 1977. Distinguishing vegetation from soil background information. Photogramnetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 43(12):1541–1552.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouse JW Jr, Haas RH, Deering DW, Schell JA, Harlan JC. 1974. Monitoring the Vernal Advancement and Retrogradation (Green Wave Effect) of Natural Vegetation. NASA/GSFC Type III Final Report, Greenbelt, MD: p. 371.

  • Roy PS, Ravan SA. 1996. Biomass estimation using satellite remote sensing data — An investigation on possible approaches for natural forest. Journal of Biosciences, 21(4): 535–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrestha HL. 2003. Comparative Evaluation of Different Spatial Resolution Data for Timber Volume Estimation. M.Sc. Thesis, International Institute for Geoinformation Science and Earth Observation, Enschede, Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nilanchal Patel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Patel, N., Majumdar, A. Biomass estimation of Shorea robusta with principal component analysis of satellite data. Journal of Forestry Research 21, 469–474 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-010-0100-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-010-0100-5

Keywords

Navigation