Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of stump girth and height on resprouting of Rhododendron arboreum following disturbance in temperate mixed broad leaved forest of Arunachal Pradesh, India

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Forestry Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sprout contribution to natural regeneration of Rhododendron arboreum following the tree felling for fuel wood and other purposes was studied in two disturbed sites (Paipraw and Falockchar) of Rhododendron forest in Arunachal Pradesh, northeast India. Cut stumps were categorized into seven girth and height classes to evaluate the effect of stump girth and height on production of sprouts. Effect of stump girth on survival of sprouts was also investigated. Results show that highest number of cut stumps is recorded in medium girth classes (50–80, 80–110, and 110–140 cm) in both Paipraw and Falockchar stands. However, density of cut stumps is higher in Paipraw (1 210 stumps·ha−1) than Falockchar (1 154 stumps·ha−1). Nevertheless, a little higher percentage of sprouting is recorded in Falockchar (18%) than that of Paipraw (15%). Similarly, maximum number of cut stumps is observed in the medium height classes (50–80, 80–110 and 110–140 cm) in both the sites. Cut stumps with lower girths show greater ability of sprouting than that of larger girth classes. Significant correlations are observed between stump girth and sprout number and between stump height and number of sprouts. Survival of sprouts also depends on stump girth. Survival of sprout shows significant variations between different sampling times in both the sites. Though overall sprout regeneration of R. arboreum is very poor, sprouts arising from lower girth classes survive well than those of higher girth classes. The findings of this investigation signify that stump sprouting is not playing much role in the natural regeneration of R. arboreum though it has the ability to sprout. Sprout survival is not adequate to restore a stand where indiscriminate tree felling is continued and the species may be considered as a poor coppicer. Therefore, regeneration through seeds and seedlings should be preferred over regeneration through sprouting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Babeux P, Mauffette Y. 1994. The effects of early and late spring cuts on the sprouting success of red maple (Acer rubrum) in northwestern Quebec. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 24: 785–791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes BV, Zak DR, Denton SR, Spurr SH. 1998. Forest Ecology. 4th Edition. John Wiley and Sons, Inc. New York, 774 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellingham PJ, Sparrow AD. 2000. Resprouting as a life history strategy in woody plant communities. Oikos, 89: 409–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellingham PJ, Tanner EVJ, Healey JR. 1994. Sprouting of trees in Jamaican montane forests, after a hurricane. Journal of Ecology, 82: 747–758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blaisdell JP, Mueggler WF. 1956. Sprouting of bitterbrush (Purshia tridentata) following burning or top removal. Ecology, 37: 365–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blake TJ. 1981. Growth related problems of aging and senescence in fast growing trees grown on short rotations. International Energy Agency, Report NE-21, National Swedish Board for Energy Source Development, Stockholm, Sweden, 43 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake TJ, Raitanen WE. 1981. A summary of factors influencing coppicing. International Energy Agency, Report NE-22, National Swedish Board for Energy Source Development, Stockholm, Sweden, 24 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond WJ, Midgley JJ. 2001. Ecology of sprouting in woody plants: the persistence niche. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 16: 45–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bond WJ, Midgley JJ. 2003. The evolutionary ecology of sprouting in woody plants. International Journal of Plant Sciences, 164: 103–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourgeois C. 1992. Le chataignier: un arbre, un bois. IDF, Paris, France, 368 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buell JH. 1940. Effect of season of cutting on sprouting of dogwood. Journal of Forestry, 38: 649–650.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cirne P, Scarano FR. 2001. Resprouting and growth dynamics after fire of the clonal shrub Andira legalis (Leguminosae) in a sandy coastal plain in south-eastern Brazil. Journal of Ecology, 89: 351–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duchok R, Kent K, Devi KA, Paul A, Khan ML. 2005. Population structure and regeneration status of medicinal tree Illicium griffithii in relation to disturbance gradients in temperate broad-leaved forest of Arunachal Pradesh. Current Science, 89: 673–676.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewel KC. 1996. Sprouting by pondcypress (Taxodium distichum var. nutans) after logging. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry, 20: 209–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabrick J, Anderson M. 2000. Oak stump sprouting in mature bottomland forests at Duck Creek conservation area. Missouri Department of Conservation. Forest Research Report No 2: 1–9.

  • Forrester F, Bauhus J, Connell M. 2003. Competition in thinned Silvertop Ash (Eucalyptus sieberi L. Johnson) stands from early coppice growth. Forest Ecology and Management, 174: 459–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FSI. 2005. State of forest report 2005. Forest Survey of India. Ministry of Environment and Forests, Dehradun, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardiner ES, Russell JrDR, Hodges JD, Fristoe TC. 2000. Impacts of mechanical tree felling on development of water tupelo regeneration in the Mobile Delta, Alabama. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry, 24: 65–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington CA. 1984. Factors influencing initial sprouting of red alder. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 14: 357–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs RJ, Gimingham CH. 1984. Studies on fire in Scottish heathland communities. II. Post-fire vegetation development. Journal of Ecology, 72: 585–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hook DD, DeBell DS. 1970. Factors influencing stump sprouting of swamp and water tupelo seedlings. Research Paper SE-57. U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Southeastern Forest Experiment Station, Asheville, NC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ickes K, Dewalt SJ, Thomas SC. 2003. Resprouting of woody saplings following stem snap by wild pigs in a Malaysian rain forest. Journal of Ecology, 91: 222–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imanishi A, Morimoto J, Imanishi J, Shibata S, Nakanishi A, Osawa N, Sakai S. 2010. Sprout initiation and growth for three years after cutting in an abandoned secondary forest in Kyoto, Japan. Landscape and Ecological Engineering, 25: 325–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irawan B, Gruber F. 2004. The importance of sprouting ability in conservation and development of Ironwood (Eusideroxylon zwageri Teijsm. and Binn.) varieties. Deutscher Tropentag 2004, October 5–7. International Research on Food Security, Natural Resource Management and Rural development, Rural Poverty Reduction through Research for Development and Transformation Humboldt-Universitat zu Berlin, Agricultural and Horticultural Faculty, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson PS. 1975. Growth and structural development of red oak sprout clumps. Forest Science, 21: 413–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson PS. 1977. Predicting oak stump sprouting and sprout development in the Missouri Ozarks. Research Paper NC-149. St. Paul, MN: United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Experiment Station, 9 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson PS. 1992. Sources of oak reproduction. In: D.L. Loftis and C.E. McGee (eds), Symposium proceedings, oak regeneration: serious problems, practical solutions. September 8–10, 1992.

  • Knoxville, TN. General Technical Report SE-84. Asheville, NC: United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Forest Experiment Station, pp. 112–131.

  • Jones RH, Raynal DJ. 1987. Root sprouting in American beech: production, survival, and the effect of parent tree vigor. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 17: 539–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kays JS, Canham CD. 1991. Effects of time and frequency of cutting on hardwood root reserves and sprout growth. Forest Science, 37: 524–539.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kays JS, Smith DW, Zedaker SM. 1985. Season of harvest and site quality effects on hardwood regeneration in the Virginia Piedmont. In: E. Shoulders (ed), Proceedings of the third biennial southern silvicultural research conference. November 7–8, 1984, Atlanta, Georgia. General Technical Report SO-54. United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Forest Experiment Station, New Orleans, LA., pp. 137–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kays JS, Smith DW, Zedaker SM, Kreh RE. 1988. Factors affecting natural regeneration of Piedmont hardwoods. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry, 12: 98–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keim RF, Chambers JL, Hughes MS, Dimov LD, Conner WH, Shaffer GP, Gardiner ES, Day JrJW. 2006. Long-term success of stump sprouts in highgraded baldcypress-water tupelo swamps in the Mississippi delta. Forest Ecology and Management, 234: 24–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy Jr HE. 1982. Growth and survival of water tupelo coppice regeneration after six growing seasons. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry, 6: 133–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan ML, Tripathi RS. 1986. Tree regeneration in a disturbed sub-tropical wet hill forest of north-east India: effect of stump diameter and height on sprouting of four tree species. Forest Ecology and Management, 17: 199–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan ML, Tripathi RS. 1989. Effects of stump diameter, stump height and sprout density on the sprout growth of four tree species in burnt and unburnt forest plots. Acta Oecologica, 10: 303–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klimesova J, Klimes L. 2007. Bud banks and their role in vegetative regeneration — a literature review and proposal for simple classification and assessment. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 8: 115–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lust N, Mohammady M. 1973. Regeneration of coppice. Sylva Gandavensis, 39:1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald JE, Powell GR. 1983. Relationships between stump sprouting and parent-tree diameter in sugar maple in the 1st year following clear-cutting. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 13: 390–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malanson GP, Trabaud L. 1988. Vigour of post-fire resprouting by Quercus coccifera L. Journal of Ecology, 76: 351–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattoon WR. 1915. The southern cypress. United States Department of Agriculture Bulletin 272. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCreary D, Tietje B, Frost B. 2006. Stump sprouting of blue oaks 19 years after harvest. In: A. Merenlender, D. McCreary and K.L. Purcell (eds), Proceedings of the sixth symposium on oak woodlands: today’s challenges, tomorrow’s opportunities. October 9–12, 2006. General Technical Report PSW-GTR-217. Albany, CA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, pp. 333–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaren KP, McDonald MA. 2003. Coppice regrowth in a disturbed tropical dry limestone forest in Jamaica. Forest Ecology and Management, 180: 99–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller AE, Phillips DR. 1984. Chainsaw and shear cutting of upland hardwoods: impact on regeneration. Research Division, Georgia Forestry Commission. Georgia Forest Research Paper 53, 12 pp.

  • Mishra BP, Tripathi RS, Tripathi OP, Pandey HN. 2003. Effects of disturbance on the regeneration of four dominant and economically important woody species in a broad-leaved subtropical humid forest of Meghalaya, north east India. Current Science, 84: 1449–1453.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miura M, Yamamoto SI. 2003. Structure and dynamics of a Castanopsis cuspidata var. sieboldii population in an old-growth, evergreen, broadleaved forest: The importance of sprout regeneration. Ecological Research, 18: 115–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mroz GD, Frederick DJ, Jurgensen MF. 1985. Site and fertilizer effects on northern hardwood stump sprouting. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 15: 535–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng SC, Corlett RT. 2003. The ecology of six Rhododendron species (Ericaceae) with contrasting local abundance and distribution patterns in Hong Kong, China. Plant Ecology, 164: 225–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver CD, Larson BC. 1996. Forest stand dynamics. Undated edition. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 520 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putz FE, Brokaw NVL. 1989. Sprouting of broken trees on Barro Colorado Island, Panama. Ecology, 70: 508–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Randall CK, Duryea ML, Vince SW, English RJ. 2005. Factors influencing stump sprouting by pondcypress (Taxodium distichum var. nutans (Ait.) Sweet). New Forests, 29: 245–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riba M. 1991. Estudi de la regeneracid per rebrotada enpoblacions d’ Erica arborea sotmeses a tallades. Ph.D. thesis, Universitat Autbnoma de Barcelona.

  • Shima K, Katagiri S, Kaneko N. 1989. Dynamics of sprout shoots during the two years after cutting a Konara (Quercus serrata) secondary forest. Journal of the Japanese Forestry Society, 71: 410–416 (In Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  • SRSAC. 2007. Natural Resource Atlas of Tawang District, Arunachal Pradesh. State Remote Sensing Application Centre, Itanagar, Arunachal Pradesh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Standiford RB, McCreary DD, Barry S, Forero LC, Knight R. 1996. Impact of firewood harvesting on hardwood rangelands varies with region. California Agriculture, 50: 7–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tripathi RS, Khan ML. 2007. Regeneration dynamics of natural forests — a review. Proceedings of the Indian National Science Academy, 73: 167–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vesk PA, Westoby M. 2004. Sprouting ability across diverse disturbances and vegetation types worldwide. Journal of Ecology, 92: 310–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weigel DR, Johnson PS. 1998. Stump sprouting probabilities for southern Indiana oaks. Tech. Brief TB-NC-7 St. Paul, MN: United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Experiment Station, 6 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wendel GW. 1975. Stump sprout growth and quality of several Appalachian hardwood species after clearcutting. United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Research Paper NE-329, 9 pp.

  • Williston HL, Shropshire FW, Balmer WE. 1980. Cypress management: a forgotten opportunity. Forestry Report SA-FR 8. U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Southeastern Area, State and Private Forestry, Atlanta, GA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamada T, Kumagawa Y, Suzuki E. 2001. Adaptive significance of vegetative sprouting for a tropical canopy tree, Scaphium longiflorum (Sterculiaceae), in a peat swamp forest in Central Kalimantan. Ecological Research, 16: 641–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zar JH. 2004. Biostatistical Analysis. 4th Edition. Pearson Education (Singapore), Pte. Ltd. Delhi, 663 pp.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Ashish.

Additional information

Foundation project: This work was supported by the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), New Delhi (38(1052)/02/EMR-II)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ashish, P., Latif, K.M. & Kumar, D.A. Effect of stump girth and height on resprouting of Rhododendron arboreum following disturbance in temperate mixed broad leaved forest of Arunachal Pradesh, India. Journal of Forestry Research 21, 433–438 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-010-0093-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-010-0093-0

Keywords

Navigation