Skip to main content
Log in

Development of two microsatellite multiplex PCR systems for high throughput genotyping in Populus euphratica

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Forestry Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Eighteen microsatellite primer pairs previously developed at Oak Ridge National Laboratory for Populus tremuloides Michx. and Populus trichocarpa Torr. & Gray were screened for amplification in Euphrates poplar, Populus euphratica Oliv. Thirteen loci were found to express polymorphisms ranging from two to 17 alleles. The eight most variable loci were selected to set up and optimize two multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays. Three populations containing altogether 436 trees were used to characterize the selected loci and ascertain their applicability for parentage analysis and genotyping studies. Through cross-checking of clonal identity against sex of the genotyped trees we estimated the maximum error rate for merging genotypes to be less than 0.045.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bruelheide H, Manegold M, Jandt U. 2004. The genetical structure of Populus euphratica and Alhagi sparsifolia stands in the Taklimakan desert. In: M. Runge and X. Zhang (eds), Ecophysiology and habitat requirements of perennial plant species in the Taklimakan desert. Contributions to a “Workshop on sustainable management of the shelterbelt vegetation of river oases in the Taklimakan desert”. Urumqi, pp. 153–160.

  • Dakin EE, Avise JC. 2004. Microsatellite null alleles in parentage analysis. Heredity, 93(5): 504–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fay MF, Lledó MD, Kornblum MM, Crespo MB. 1999. From the waters of Babylon? Populus euphratica in Spain is clonal and probably introduced. Biodiversity and Conservation, 8(6): 769–778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerber S, Chabrier P, Kremer A. 2003. FaMoz: a software for parentage analysis using dominant, codominant and uniparentally inherited markers. Molecular Ecology Notes, 3(4): 479–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halkett F, Simon J, Balloux F. 2005. Tackling the population genetics of clonal and partially clonal organisms. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 20(4): 194–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henegariu O, Heerema NA, Dlouhy SR, Vance GH, Vogt PH. 1997. Multiplex PCR: critical parameters and step-by-step protocol. BioTechniques, 23(3): 504–511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman JI, Amos W. 2005. Microsatellite genotyping errors: detection approaches, common sources and consequences for paternal exclusion. Molecular Ecology, 14(2): 599–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lepais O, Léger V, Gerber S. 2006. Short Note: high throughput microsatellite genotyping in oak species. Silvae Genetica, 55(4/5): 238–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousset F. 2008. GENEPOP’007: a complete re-implementation of the GENEPOP software for Windows and Linux. Molecular Ecology Resources, 8(1): 103–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saito Y, Shiraishi S, Tanimoto T, Yin L, Watanabe S, Ide Y. 2002. Genetic diversity of Populus euphratica populations in northwestern China determined by RAPD DNA analysis. New Forests, 23(2): 97–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selkoe KA, Toonen RJ. 2006. Microsatellites for ecologists: a practical guide to using and evaluating microsatellite markers. Ecology Letters, 9(5): 615–629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoeckel S, Grange J, Fernández-Manjarres JF, Bilger I, Frascaria-Lacoste N, Mariette S. 2006. Heterozygote excess in a self-incompatible and partially clonal tree species — Prunus avium L. Molecular Ecology, 15(8): 2109–2118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki J, Herben T, Maki M. 2004. An under-appreciated difficulty: sampling of plant populations for analysis using molecular markers. Evolutionary Ecology, 18(5-6): 625–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thevs N. 2005. Tugay vegetation in the middle reaches of the Tarim River. Vegetation types and their ecology. Archiv für Naturschutz und Landschaftsforschung, 44(1): 63–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuskan GA, Gunter LE, Yang ZK, Yin T, Sewell MM, DiFazio SP. 2004. Characterization of microsatellites revealed by genomic sequencing of Populus trichocarpa. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 34(1): 85–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vallone PM, Butler JM. 2004. AutoDimer: a screening tool for primer-dimer and hairpin structures. BioTechniques, 37(2): 226–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan SP, Russell K. 2004. Characterization of novel microsatellites and development of multiplex PCR for large-scale population studies in wild cherry, Prunus avium. Molecular Ecology Notes, 4(3): 429–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner HW, Sefc KM. 1999. IDENTITY 1.0. Centre for Applied Genetics, University of Agricultural Sciences Vienna.

  • Wang S, Chen B, Li H. 1996. Euphrates poplar forest. Beijing: China Environmental Science Press, 212 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisgerber H, Kownatzki D, Mussong M. 1995. Natural poplar resources in China and their significance for breeding and afforestation. Silvae Genetica, 44(4): 298–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu Y, Wang J, Liu J. 2008. Development and characterization of microsatellite markers in Populus euphratica (Populaceae). Molecular Ecology Resources, 8(5): 1142–1144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pascal Eusemann.

Additional information

Foundation project: This study was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft DFG (grant number SCHN 1080/1-1)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eusemann, P., Fehrenz, S. & Schnittler, M. Development of two microsatellite multiplex PCR systems for high throughput genotyping in Populus euphratica . Journal of Forestry Research 20, 195–198 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-009-0038-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-009-0038-7

Keywords

Navigation