Abstract
An assessment index system including environment, socio-culture, economy and technology was established for evaluating environmental construction level of community (objective construction), and questionnaire was designed according to paper review for evaluating residential satisfaction (subjective satisfaction). The index system was divided into four layers: system (A), subsystems (B), categories (C), and indicators (D), and in total of 38 indicators was established. The Xihe community, affiliated to Nanfen district, Benxi City, Liaoning Province, China was selected as a case study. Results indicated that the community sustainability index related to objective environmental construction was 0.4355 and was classified as class III (moderate); the community sustainability index related to the residential satisfaction was 0.4255, belonging to class III. In conclusion, the sustainability of Xihe community was moderate and needed to be improved. Residential satisfaction was lower than objective environmental construction. The assessment index system established in this study is able to reflect the comprehensive sustainability of community and can be used to evaluate other similar communities’ sustainability
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Deakin M. 2003. Developing sustainable communities: the settlement model, design solution and matter of environmental assessment. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 5(4): 551–573.
Deakin M. 2003. Developing sustainable communities in Edinburgh’s South East Wedge: The settlement model and design solution. Journal of Urban Design, 8(2): 137–148.
Deakin M, Allwinkle S. 2007. Urban regeneration and sustainable communities: The role of networks, innovation, and creativity in building successful partnerships. Journal of Urban Technology, 14(1): 77–91.
HwanSuk CC, Ercan S. 2006. Sustainability indicators for managing community tourism. Tourism Management, 27(6): 1274–1289.
Junnila S, Horvath A. 2003. Life-Cycle environmental effects of an office building. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 9(4): 157–166.
Lachman BE. 1997. Linking Sustainable Community Activities to Pollution Prevention: A Sourcebook [M]. Santa Monica, California: The Rand Corporation, p8–11.
Li Huasheng, Xu Ruixiang, Gao Zhonggui, Peng Buzhuo. 2005. Quality evaluation of human settlements in a city scale-a case study on Nanjing city. Human Geography, 20(1): 1–5. (in Chinese)
Nicollier TC, Ferrari Y, Jemelin C, Jolliet O. 2003. Assessing sustainability: An assessment framework to evaluate agenda 21 actions at the local level. International Journal of Sustainable Development, 10: 225–237.
Qin Youguo. 2006. Green buildings under China’s actual conditions. China Housing Facilities, 7: 30–33. (in Chinese)
Roseland M. 2000. Sustainable community development: Integrating environmental, economic, and social objectives. Progress in Planning, 54(2): 73–132.
Saaty TL. 1990. How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 1(48): 9–26.
Shen Jing. 2000. Advisory theory and practice. Beijing: China Electrical Press, p1–180. (in Chinese)
Sustainable Seattle. 1998. The Sustainable Seattle 1998 Indictors of Sustainable Community. Seattle, WA: Sustainable Seattle.
Tian Meirong, Gao Jixi, Zhang Biao, Qiao Qing. 2007. Study on assessment index system of ecological community. Research of Environmental Sciences, 20(3): 87–92. (in Chinese)
Valentin A, Spangenberg JH. 2000. A guild to community sustainability indicators. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 20: 381–392.
Wang Rusong, Xu Hongxi. 2005. A Comprehensive Approach for Yangzhou Eco-city Development. Beijing: China Science and Technology Press, p232. (in Chinese)
Wu Liangyong. 2001. Guide of Human Settlements. Beijing: China Architecture and Industry Press, p 1–120. (in Chinese)
Yuan Wen, James P, Yang Kai. 2003. Community sustainable development indicator systems in China: A case study of Chongming County, Shanghai. Geographical Research, 22(4): 484–494. (in Chinese)
Zhang Yan, Yang Zhifeng, Yu Xiangyi. 2006. Measurement and evaluation of interactions in complex urban ecosystem. Ecological Modelling, 196(1/2): 77–89.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Foundation items: This study was supported by the National Key Technologies R & D Program of China (2006BAD03A09), Agrifund of China’s Ministry of Science and Technology (2006GB24910472).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Han, Y., Dai, Lm., Zhao, Xf. et al. Construction and application of an assessment index system for evaluating the eco-community’s sustainability. Journal of Forestry Research 19, 154–158 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-008-0027-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-008-0027-2