Abstract
Responding to the stimulus afforded by Little et al.’s “Pragmatic pluralism: Mutual tolerance of contested understandings between orthodox and alternative practitioners in autologous stem cell transplantation,” this paper explores how the norms of qualitative inquiry affect the representation of emotion in research reports. It describes a conflict between the construction of emotion in qualitative research accounts and its application to analysis and theorization, whose origins may lie in researchers’ reticence when it comes to conveying or using the emotional features of data. The technical aspects of report writing that are associated with this conflict are explored via a deconstruction of Little et al.’s paper and a survey of the qualitative research methods literature. Writing to convey emotion and analysing to include author-constructed emotional context are neglected topics. Using data in Little et al.’s text, the paper demonstrates the importance of author-constructed emotional context to theory generation. The paper recommends the inclusion of emotional context as data in analysis and points to lessons Little et al.’s paper offers in the areas of narrative technique and reflexive practice.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adorno, G. 2015. Between two worlds: Liminality and late-stage cancer-directed therapy. Omega (Westport) 71(2): 99-125.
Bauby, J.-D.. 2008. The diving-bell and the butterfly. Translated by Jeremy Leggatt. [PS ed.] ed. London: Harper Perennial.
Blows, E., L. Bird, J. Seymour, and K. Cox. 2012. Liminality as a framework for understanding the experience of cancer survivorship: a literature review. Journal of Advanced Nursing 68(10): 2155−2164.
Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2013. Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginnners. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Broom, A. 2009. Cancer patients’ accounts of negotiating a plurality of therapeutic options. Qualitative Health Research 19(8): 1050−1059.
Carter, S.M. 2006. Longitudinal qualitative research design: Experience over time. Australian Consortium for Social and Political Research Incorporated Social Science Methodology Conference.
Carter, S.M., C.F.C. Jordens, C. McGrath, and M. Little. 2008. You have to make something of all that rubbish, do you? An empirical investigation of the social process of qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research 18(9): 1264−1276.
Carter, S.M., and M. Little. 2007. Justifying knowledge, justifying method, taking action: Epistemologies, methodologies, and methods in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research 17(10): 1316−1328.
Charmaz, K. 2014. Constructing grounded theory. London: Sage.
Dickson-Swift, V., E.L. James, S. Kippen, and P. Liamputtong. 2016. Doing sensitive research: What challenges do qualitative researchers face? Qualitative Research 7(3): 327−353.
Dunn, E., A. Arber, and A. Gallagher. 2016. The immediacy of illness and existential crisis: Patients’ lived experience of under-going allogeneic stem cell transplantation for haematological malignancy. A phenomenological study. European Journal of Oncology Nursing 21: 90−96.
Ezzy, D. 2010. Qualitative interviewing as an embodied emotional performance. Qualitative Inquiry 16(3): 163−170.
Gair, S. 2012. Feeling their stories: Contemplating empathy, insider/outsider positionings, and enriching qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research 22(1): 134−143.
Gilbert, K. 2000. Introduction: Why are we interested in emotions? In The emotional nature of qualitative research, edited by K. Gilbert. CRC Press.
Grant, S.J., M. Marthick, and J. Lacey. 2019. Establishing an integrative oncology service in the Australian healthcare setting-the Chris O’Brien Lifehouse Hospital experience. Support Care Cancer 27(6): 2069−2076.
Grbich, C. 2013. Qualitative data analysis: An introduction. Thousand Oaks, Calif: SAGE.
Grossman, M., J. Agulnik, and G. Batist. 2012. The Peter Brojde lung cancer centre: A model of integrative practice. Current Oncology 19(3): e145−159.
Guthlin, C., C. Holmberg, and G. Klein. 2016. Oncologists’ experiences of discussing complementary and alternative treatment options with their cancer patients. A qualitative analysis. Support Care Cancer 24(9): 3857−3862.
Hermanowicz, J.C. 2002. The great interview: 25 strategies for studying people in bed. Qualitative sociology 25(4): 479−499.
Holloway, I., and F.C. Biley. 2011. Being a qualitative researcher. Qualitative Health Research 21(7): 968−975.
Hollway, W. 2016. Emotional experience plus reflection: Countertransference and reflexivity in research. The Psychotherapist 62.
Hunter, J., S. Grant, G.P. Delaney, et al. 2021. Barriers and facilitators to integrative oncology services in Australia: A changed mind set required. Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine 27(S1): S89−S98.
Hunter, J., J. Ussher, C. Parton, et al. 2018. Australian integrative oncology services: A mixed-method study exploring the views of cancer survivors. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine 18(1): 153.
Jones, E., L. Nissen, A. McCarthy, K. Steadman, and C. Windsor. 2019. Exploring the use of complementary and alternative medicine in cancer patients. Integrative Cancer Therapies 18: 1–9.
Jordens, C.F.C., B. Morrell, P. Harnett, K. Hobbs, C. Mason, and I.H. Kerridge. 2010. Cancergazing? CA125 and post-treatment surveillance in advanced ovarian cancer. Social Science & Medicine 71(9): 1548−1556.
Keen, S. 2006. A theory of narrative empathy. Narrative 14(3): 207−236.
Kerridge, I.H., M. Lowe, and C. Stewart. 2013. Ethics and law for the health professions. Sydney: Federation Press.
Kitto, S.C., J. Chesters, and C. Grbich. 2008. Quality in qualitative research: Criteria for authors and assessors in the submission and assessment of qualitative research articles for the Medical Journal of Australia. Medical Journal of Australia 188(4): 243−246.
Liamputtong, P. 2007. Researching the vulnerable: A guide to sensitive research methods. London: SAGE.
Little, M., C. Jordens, C. McGrath, K. Montgomery, W. Lipworth, and I. Kerridge. 2008. Informed consent and medical ordeal: A qualitative study. Internal Medicine Journal 38(8): 624−628.
Little, M., C.F. Jordens, C. McGrath, K. Montgomery, I. Kerridge, and S.M. Carter. 2007. Pragmatic pluralism: Mutual tolerance of contested understandings between orthodox and alternative practitioners in autologous stem cell transplantation. Social Science and Medicine 64(7): 1512−1523.
Little, M., C. Jordens, K. Paul, K. Montgomery, and B. Philipson. 1998. Liminality: A major category of the experience of cancer illness. Social Science and Medicine 47(10): 1485−1494.
Mason, J. 2002. Qualitative researching. London: Sage.
McGrath, C., C.F. Jordens, K. Montgomery, and I.H. Kerridge. 2006. “Right” way to “do” illness? Thinking critically about positive thinking. Internal Medicine Journal 36(10): 665−669.
Ott, I.M., O. Micke, K. Muenstedt, et al. 2018. Individual experiences on complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) and attitude towards alternative medicine in cancer care—a survey among oncology/hematology nurses. Trace Elements and Electrolytes 35(04): 91−99.
Paltiel, O., M. Avitzour, T. Peretz, et al. 2001. Determinants of the use of complementary therapies by patients with cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology 19(9): 2439−2448.
Pope, C., S. Ziebland, and N. Mays. 2000. Qualitative research in health care: Analyzing qualitative data. BMJ 320.
Rager, K.B. 2005. Compassion stress and the qualitative researcher. Qualitative Health Research 15(3): 423−430.
Thompson, K. 2007. Liminality as a descriptor for the cancer experience. Illness, Crisis & Loss 15(4): 333−351.
Ulrich, A., L. Evron, and A. Ostenfeld-Rosenthal. 2011. Patients’ views of CAM as spiritual practice. Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice 17(4): 221-225.
Watson, C. 2009. The ‘impossible vanity’: uses and abuses of empathy in qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Research 9(1): 105−117.
Watts, J. 2008. Emotion, empathy and exit: Reflections on doing ethnographic research on sensitive topics. Medical Sociology Online 3(2): 3−14.
Woodby, L.L., B.R. Williams, A.R. Wittich, and K.L. Burgio. 2011. Expanding the notion of researcher distress: The cumulative effects of coding. Qualitative Health Research 21(6): 830−838.
Yardley, L. 2000. Dilemmas in qualitative health research. Psychology & Health 15(2): 215−228.
Acknowledgements
I am deeply grateful to Associate Professor Julie Mooney-Somers, Dr Claire Hooker, and Professor Stacy Carter for their advice and encouragement, and to Dr Elizabeth van Ekert for her help with researching CAM in Australia. I am also indebted to the two anonymous reviewers, whose comments and suggestions helped improve this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gallagher, S. Response—An Extreme Ordeal: Writing Emotion in Qualitative Research. Bioethical Inquiry 19, 101–108 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-021-10151-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-021-10151-x