New Zealand District Health Boards’ Open Disclosure Policies: A Qualitative Review
- 84 Downloads
Background: New Zealand health and disability providers are expected to have local open disclosure policies in place, however, empirical analysis of these policies has not been undertaken. Aim: This study aims to (1) examine the scope and content of open disclosure policies in New Zealand (2) compare open disclosure policies in New Zealand, and (3) provide baseline results for future research. Methods: Open disclosure policies were requested from all twenty New Zealand District Health Boards in June 2016. A total of twenty-one policies were received, with nineteen policies included in the review. The data were analysed using conventional content analysis. Areas of identified guidance were categorised categorized under the headings: 1) identification of an adverse event, 2) actions before disclosure, 3) disclosure of harm, and 4) actions after disclosure. Results: A total of forty-six distinct areas of guidance could be categorized under the different phases of the open disclosure life-cycle. Conclusion: This review has identified significant unwarranted heterogeneity and important gaps in open disclosure documents in New Zealand which urgently needs to be addressed. Open disclosure policies which are both flexible and specific should enhance the likelihood that injured patients’ needs will be met.
KeywordsMedical Errors Open Disclosure Policies New Zealand
- Australian Council for Safety and Quality in Health Care. 2003. Open disclosure standard: A national standard for open communication in public and private hospitals, following an adverse event in health care. Sydney: Australian Council for Safety and Quality in Health Care.Google Scholar
- Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. 2008. Open disclosure standard: A national standard for open communication in public and private hospitals, following an adverse event in health care. Sydney: Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care.Google Scholar
- ———. 2012. Open disclosure standard review report. Sydney: Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care.Google Scholar
- ———. 2013. Australian open disclosure framework. Sydney: Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care.Google Scholar
- Canadian Patient Safety Institute. 2008. Canadian disclosure guidelines. Ottawa: Canadian Patient Safety Institute.Google Scholar
- Health and Disability Commissioner. 2009. Guidance on open disclosure policies. http://www.hdc.org.nz/media/2981/guidance-on-open-disclosure-policies-dec-09.pdf Accessed April 6, 2018.
- Health Quality & Safety Commission New Zealand. 2012. New Zealand health and disability services—National reportable events policy 2012. https://www.hqsc.govt.nz/assets/Reportable-Events/Publications/Reportable-Events-Policy-Final-Jan-2013.pdf. Accessed April 6, 2018.
- ———. 2017. Learning from adverse events. 1 July 2016 to 30 June 2017. What are the individual DHB figures? https://www.hqsc.govt.nz/assets/Reportable-Events/Publications/AEReport_DHB_figures.pdf. Accessed May 13, 2018.
- Iedema, R., N. Mallock, R. Sorensen, et al. 2008. Final report: Evaluation of the national open disclosure pilot program. Sydney: Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care.Google Scholar
- Institute of Medicine. 2000. To err is human: Building a safer health system. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
- Johnston, M. 2013. Living in the shadow of CJD. New Zealand Herald, February 5. http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10863457. Accessed April 6, 2018.
- Manning, J. 2010. Access to justice for New Zealand health consumers. Journal of Law and Medicine 18(1): 178–194.Google Scholar
- Massachusetts Coalition for the Prevention of Medical Errors. 2006. When things go wrong: Responding to adverse events. A consensus statement of the Harvard hospitals. http://mitss.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/respondingToAdverseEvents.pdf. Accessed April 6, 2018.
- National Patient Safety Agency. 2009. Being open: Saying sorry when things go wrong. https://qi.elft.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/being-open-framework.pdf. Accessed April 6, 2018.
- New Zealand Law Commission. 2012. The public’s right to know: Review of the official information legislation. http://www.lawcom.govt.nz/sites/default/files/projectAvailableFormats/NZLC%20R125.pdf. Accessed April 6, 2018.
- New Zealand Ministry of Health. 2008. Health and disability services standards NZS 8134. Wellington: Ministry of Health.Google Scholar
- New Zealand Ministry of Health. 2016. Private health insurance coverage 2011–15: New Zealand Health Survey. https://www.health.govt.nz/publication/private-health-insurance-coverage-2011-15-new-zealand-health-survey. Accessed December 17, 2018.
- Prouty, C.D., M.B. Foglia, and T.H. Gallagher. 2013. Patients’ experiences with disclosure of a large-scale adverse event. Journal of Clinical Ethics 24(4): 353–363.Google Scholar
- Truog, R.D., D.M. Browning, J.A. Johnson, T.H. Gallagher, and L.L. Leape. 2010. Talking with patients and families about medical error: A guide for education and practice. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
- Walton, M., R. Harrison, J. Smith-Merry, et al. 2017. Disclosure of adverse events: A data linkage study reporting patient experiences among Australian adults aged >45 years. Australian Health Review. https://doi.org/10.1071/AH17179.
- World Health Organization. 2009. WHO patient safety research. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar