Journal of Bioethical Inquiry

, Volume 14, Issue 2, pp 217–228 | Cite as

Testicular Tissue Cryopreservation and Ethical Considerations: A Scoping Review

  • Angel PetropanagosEmail author
Symposium: Bioethics and Biopolitics: Presents and Futures of Reproduction


Testicular tissue cryopreservation (TTCP) aims to preserve the future option of genetic reproduction for prepubescent cancer patients who are at risk of infertility as a result of their cancer therapies. This technology is experimental and currently only offered in the research context. As TTCP moves towards becoming more widely available, it is imperative that healthcare providers recognize the complex ethical issues surrounding this technology. This scoping review study identifies and assesses the range and depth of ethical concerns related to this testicular tissue cryopreservation technology. At present, no such scoping review of ethical concerns exists in the TTCP literature. The forty-three full-text articles included in this study yielded twenty-two different ethical considerations discussed in relation to TTCP. It was observed that these ethical considerations fit within a mainstream Principlism approach to bioethics. Accordingly, there are ethical gaps in the TTCP literature that can be identified with alternative moral lenses. In particular, it was found that ethical concerns related to context and relational aspects of identity were absent in nearly all ethical examinations of TTCP. Furthermore, only 9 per cent of articles reviewed in this study focused primarily on the ethics of TTCP, thus demonstrating a need for further in depth ethical analyses of this technology. The results of this study are important for supporting the ethical provision of TTCP and can contribute to policy and guideline development. The findings of this study demonstrate the need for greater depth and diversity in analyses of ethical considerations related to this technology.


Testicular tissue cryopreservation Fertility Preservation Pediatric cancer patients Clinical trials Ethical considerations Scoping Review 



Funding in support of this research was provided by the Canada Research Chair in Bioethics and Philosophy on “Impact Ethics: Making a Difference.” I also gratefully acknowledge the support of the Brocher Foundation in Hermance, Switzerland ( which provided an idyllic setting in which to complete my writing.


  1. Anderson, R.A., R.T. Mitchell, T.W. Kelsey, N. Spears, E.E. Telfer, and W.H.B. Wallace. 2015. Cancer treatment and gonadal function: Experimental and established strategies for fertility preservation in children and young adults. The Lancet Diabetes Endocrinology 3(7): 556–567.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Arksey, H., and L. O’Malley. 2005. Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 8(1): 19–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Babayev, S., E. Arslan, S. Kogan, F. Moy, and K. Oktay. 2013. Evaluation of ovarian and testicular tissue cryopreservation in children undergoing gonadotoxic therapies. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 30(1): 3–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bahadur, G., and D. Ralph. 1999. Gonadal tissue cryopreservation in boys with pediatric cancers. Human Reproduction 14(1): 11–17.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bahadur, G., R. Chatterjee, and D. Ralph. 2000. Testicular tissue cryopreservation in boys: Ethical and legal issues. Human Reproduction 15(6): 1416–1420.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Beauchamp, T., and J. Childress. 1979. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Brougham, M.F.H., C.J.H. Kelnar, R.M. Sharpe, and W.H.B. Wallace. 2003. Male fertility following childhood cancer: Current concepts and future therapies. Asian Journal of Andrology 5(4): 325–337.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Campo-Engelstein, L. 2013. Offering testicular cryopreservation to boys: The increasing importance of biological fatherhood. The American Journal of Bioethics 12(3): 39–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clark A.T., B.T. Phillips, and K.E. Orwig. 2011. Fruitful progress to fertility: Male fertility in the test tube. Nature Medicine 17(12): 1564–1565.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Clarke, D.L. 2009. Moral Principlism alone is insufficient, and traditional moral theories remain important for practical ethics. South African Journal of Bioethics and Law 2(2): 54–58.Google Scholar
  11. Clouser, K.D., and B. Gert. 1990. A critique of principlism. The Journal of Medicine & Philosophy 15(2): 219–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. De Roo, C., K. Tilleman, G. T’Sjoen, and P. De Sutter. 2016. Fertility options in transgender people. International Review of Psychiatry 28(1): 112–119.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Di Pietro, M.L., and A.A. Teleman. 2013. Cryopreservation of testicular tissue in pediatrics: Practical and ethical issues. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine 26(15): 1524–1527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dillon, K.E., and C.R. Gracia. 2012. Pediatric and young adult patients and oncofertility. Current Treatment Options in Oncology 13(2):161–173.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Fernbach, A., B. Lockart, C.L. Armus et al. 2014. Evidence-based recommendations for fertility preservation options for inclusion in treatments for pediatric and adolescent patients diagnosed with cancer. Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing 31(4): 211–222.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Galvin, K.M., and M.L. Clayman. 2010. Whose future is it? Ethical family decision making about daughters’ treatment in the oncofertility context. Cancer Treatment and Research 156: 429–445.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Gies, I., J. De Schepper, and H. Trounay. 2015. Progress and prospects for fertility preservation in prepubertal boys with cancer. Current Opinion in Endrocrinology, Diabetes and Obesity 22(3): 203–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ginsberg, J.P., C.A. Carlson, K. Lin, et al. 2010. An experimental protocol for fertility preservation in prepubertal boys recently diagnosed with cancer: A report of acceptability and safety. Andrology 25(1): 37–41.Google Scholar
  19. Ginsberg, J.P. 2011. New advances in fertility preservation for pediatric cancer patients. Current Opinion Pediatrics 23(1): 9–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ginsberg, J.P., Y. Li, C.A. Carlson et al. 2014. Testicular tissue cryopreservation in prepubertal male children: An analysis of parental decision-making. Pediatric Blood and Cancer 61(9): 1673–1678.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Goossens, E., D. Van Saen, and H. Tournaye. 2013. Spermatogonial stem cell preservation and transplantation: From research to clinic. Human Reproduction 28(4): 897–907.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Heath, J.A., and C.J. Stern. 2006. Fertility preservation in children newly diagnosed with cancer: Existing standards of practice in Australia and New Zealand. Medical Journal of Australia 185(10): 538–541.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Holoch, P., and M. Wald. 2011. Current options for preservation of fertility in the male. Fertility Sterility 96(2): 286–290.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Hovatta, O. 2001. Cryopreservation of testicular tissue in young cancer patients. Human Reproduction Update 7(4): 378–383.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Jahnukainen, K., J. Ehmcke, O. Söder, and S. Schlatt. 2006. Clinical potential and putative risks of fertility preservation in children using gonadal tissue or germline stem cells. Pediatric Research 59: 40R–47R.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Kinahan K.E., A. Didwania, and C.L. Nieman. 2007. Childhood cancer: Fertility and psychosocial implications. Cancer Treatment and Research 138: 191–200.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Klipstein, S., and M.E. Fallat. 2013. Applying the experience of ovarian tissue cryopreservation to testicular tissue cryopreservation: What the girls have taught us. The American Journal of Bioethics 13(3:) 44–46.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Marzillano, A., and A. Moyer. 2013. An additional consideration regarding expanding access to testicular tissue cryopreservation: Infertility and social stigma. The American Journal of Bioethics 13(3): 48–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mertes, H., and G. Guido Pennings. 2013. Testicular tissue cryopreservation: Combining access with safeguards. The American Journal of Bioethics 13(3): 46–48.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Mitchell, R.R., P.T.K. Saunders, R.M. Sharpe, CJ.H. Kelnar, and W.H.B. Wallace. 2009. Male fertility and strategies for fertility preservation following childhood cancer. In Endocrine Development, Vol. 15, 101–134. Karger Publishers.Google Scholar
  31. Murphy, T.F. 2010. Parents’ choices in banking boys’ testicular tissue. Journal of Medical Ethics 36(12): 806e–809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pacey, A.A., and C. Eiser. 2014. The importance of fertility preservation in cancer patients. Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy 14(5): 487–489.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Picton, H.M., C. Wyns, R.A. Anderson, et al. 2015. A European perspective on testicular tissue cryopreservation for fertility preservation in prepubertal and adolescent boys. Human Reproduction 30(11): 2463–2475.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Rawlinson, M.C. 2001. The concept of a feminist bioethics. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 26(4): 405–416.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Revel, A., and S. Revel-Vilk. 2008. Pediatric fertility preservation: Is it time to offer testicular tissue cryopreservation? Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology 282(1): 143–149.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Rogers, A. 2013. Restricting access to reproductive uses of minors’ stored gonadal tissue. The American Journal of Bioethics 13(3): 41–42.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Rumrill, P.D., S.M. Fitzgerald, and W.R. Merchant. 2010. Using scoping literature reviews as a means of understanding and interpreting existing literature. Work: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment & Rehabilitation 35(3): 399–404.Google Scholar
  38. Ruutianen, T., S. Miler, A. Caplan and J.P. Ginsberg. 2013. Expanding access to testicular tissue cryopreservation: an analysis by analogy. The American Journal of Bioethics 13(3): 28–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sadri-Adrekani, B., and A. Atala. 2014. Testicular tissue cryopreservation and spermatogonial stem cell transplantation to restore fertility: From bench to bedside. Stem Cell Research & Therapy 5(3): 68–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Satkoske, V.B., and L.S. Parker. 2013. Preserving testicular tissue and a boy’s open reproductive future. The American Journal of Bioethics 13(3): 36–37.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Sauvat, F., N. Binart, C. Poirot, and S. Sarnacki. 2009. Preserving fertility in prepubertal children. Hormone Research 71(S1):82–86.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Schlatt, S., J. Ehmcke, and K. Jahnukainen. 2009. Testicular stem cells for fertility preservation: Preclinical studies on male germ cell transplantation and testicular grafting. Pediatric Blood and Cancer 53(2): 274–280.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Walker, M.U. 2008. Moral understandings: A feminist study in ethics. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wallace, H.B., R.A. Anderson, and D.S. Irvine. 2005. Fertility preservation for young patients with cancer: Who is at risk and what can be offered? Lancet Oncology 6(4): 209–218.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Wallace, H.B. 2011. Oncofertility and preservation of reproductive capacity in children and young adults. Cancer 117(S10): 2301–2310.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Wyns, C., M. Curaba, S. Petit, et al. 2011. Management of fertility preservation in prepubertal patients: 5 years’ experience at the Catholic University of Louvain. Human Reproduction 26(4): 737–747.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Wyns, C., M. Curaba, B. Martinez-Madrid, A. Van Langendonckt, W. François-Xavier, and J. Donnez. 2007. Spermatogonial survival after cryopreservation and short-term orthotopic immature human cryptorchid testicular tissue grafting to immunodeficient mice. Human Reproduction 22(6): 1603–1611.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Zakak, N.N. 2009. Fertility issues of childhood cancer survivors: The role of the pediatric nurse practitioner in fertility preservation. Association of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology Nurses 26(1): 48–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Journal of Bioethical Inquiry Pty Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Novel Tech Ethics, Faculty of MedicineDalhousie UniversityHalifaxCanada

Personalised recommendations