This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Professor Kellie’s report was largely consistent with the evidence of PMH. He rejected the position of Oshin’s parents concerning administering palliative care only and alternative therapies see CAHS v Kiszko & Anor  FCWA 34, –.
Re J (A Minor) (wardship: medical treatment)  Fam 33, 46 (Lord Donaldson), cited in The NHS Trust v A (A Child) Ors  EWCH 1696 (Fam), recently applied in Re JM (A Child)  EWCH 2832 (Fam).
The NHS Trust v A (A Child) & Ors  EWHC 1696 (Fam); Re JM (A Child)  EWHC 2832 (Fam); Re Norma  NZFLR 445.
Re Norma  NZFLR 445, 451 cited by Thackray CJ at .
About this article
Cite this article
Richards, B., Okninski, M.E. Regulating “Quack” Medicine and Decision-Making For Children Re-visited. Bioethical Inquiry 13, 467–471 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-016-9746-9
- Innovative treatment
- Vulnerable patients
- Best interests
- Quality of life