Notes
Professor Kellie’s report was largely consistent with the evidence of PMH. He rejected the position of Oshin’s parents concerning administering palliative care only and alternative therapies see CAHS v Kiszko & Anor [2016] FCWA 34, [18]–[22].
Re J (A Minor) (wardship: medical treatment) [1991] Fam 33, 46 (Lord Donaldson), cited in The NHS Trust v A (A Child) Ors [2007] EWCH 1696 (Fam), recently applied in Re JM (A Child) [2015] EWCH 2832 (Fam).
The NHS Trust v A (A Child) & Ors [2007] EWHC 1696 (Fam); Re JM (A Child) [2015] EWHC 2832 (Fam); Re Norma [1992] NZFLR 445.
Re Norma [1992] NZFLR 445, 451 cited by Thackray CJ at [57].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Richards, B., Okninski, M.E. Regulating “Quack” Medicine and Decision-Making For Children Re-visited. Bioethical Inquiry 13, 467–471 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-016-9746-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-016-9746-9