Skip to main content

Symptom and Surface: Disruptive Deafness and Medieval Medical Authority

Abstract

This essay examines constructions of deafness in medieval culture, exploring how deaf experience disrupts authoritative discourses in three textual genres: medical treatise, literary fiction, and autobiographical writing. Medical manuals often present deafness as a physical defect, yet they also suggest how social conditions for deaf people can be transformed in lieu of treatment protocols. Fictional narratives tend to associate deafness with sin or social stigma, but they can also imagine deaf experience with a remarkable degree of sympathy and nuance. Autobiographical writing by deaf authors most vividly challenges diagnostic models of disability, exploring generative forms of perception that deafness can foster. In tracing the disruptive force that deaf experience exerts on perceived notions of textual authority, this essay reveals how medieval culture critiqued the diagnostic power of medical practitioners. Deafness does not simply function as a symptom of an individual problem or a metaphor for a spiritual or social condition; rather, deafness is a transformative capacity affording new modes of knowing self and other.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

Notes

  1. 1.

    For a modern English translation see Power (1910, 1922); for an English translation with colour images and commentary, see Svenberg and Murray Jones (2014). High-resolution color images available at the World Digital Library http://www.wdl.org/en/item/11631/ and non-color images are accessible at the Wellcome Collection website: http://wellcomeimages.org.

  2. 2.

    Modern English translation is my own; original Middle English language (here in italics) follows the text as excerpted by Stephen Shepherd and printed in Wogan-Browne et al. (1999).

  3. 3.

    This phrasing is derived from literary historian Lee Patterson (Sayers 2010, 87).

  4. 4.

    This essay avoids conflating deafness and disability, even if its readings show how social circumstances disadvantage deaf people. The Middle Ages predated the invention of the term “disability” and its status as a cultural or political concept, so medievalists have engaged in critical discussions about the applicability of modern terms of analysis to the historical past. Medical models positing disability as a pathologized condition have increasingly given way to social models framing disability as a cultural construct; more recently, religious models stress that medieval people conceived themselves as psychosomatic wholes. For an overview of these successive models in medieval disability studies, see Godden and Hsy (2015).

  5. 5.

    English quotations follow the translation by Seidenspinner-Nuñez (1998). Original language is used only when crucial for the argument; any quoted Spanish text follows Castro Ponce (2001).

References

  1. Arderne, J. ca. 1412. De arte phisicali et de cirurgia [On the practice of medicine and surgery]. Stockholm, National Library of Sweden, MS X 188, fol. 2.

  2. Bauman, H-D. 2008. Introduction: Listening to deaf studies. In Open your eyes: Deaf studies talking, edited by H-D. Bauman, 1–34. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bauman, H-D., and J.J. Murray. 2014. Deaf gain: An introduction. In Deaf gain: Raising the stakes for human diversity, edited by H-D. Bauman and J.J. Murray, xv–xlii. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

  4. Benson, L., (ed. 2008). The riverside Chaucer, 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Best, S., and S. Marcus. 2009. Surface reading: An introduction. Representations 108(1), 1: 1–21.

  6. Bloom, G. 2007. Voice in motion: Staging gender, shaping sound in early modern England. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Bruce, S.G. 2010. Silence and sign language in medieval monasticism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Castro Ponce, C.E. 2001. Teresa de Cartagena: “Arboleda de los enfermos” y “Admiracion operum Dei.” Edición critica singular. Ph.D. diss., Brown University.

  9. de Saint-Loup, A. 1993. Images of the deaf in medieval Western Europe. In Looking back: A reader on the history of deaf communities and their sign languages, edited by R. Fischer and H. Lane, 379–402. Hamburg: Signum.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Godden, R.H., and J. Hsy. 2015. Analytical survey: Encountering disability in the middle ages. New Medieval Literatures 15: 317–343.

  11. Haualand, H. 2008. Sound and belonging: What is a community? In Open your eyes: Deaf studies talking, edited by H-D. Bauman, 111–126. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jones, P. M. 1998. Medieval medicine in illuminated manuscripts, 2nd ed. London: British Library.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Orlemanski, J. 2012. Jargon and the matter of medicine in Middle English. Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies 42(2): 394–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Power, D., trans. 1922. John Arderne’s De arte phisicali et de cirurgia (1412). New York: William Wood & Co.

  15. Power, D., trans. 1910. John Arderne’s Treatises of Fistula in Ano, Haemorrhoids and Clysters. London: Early English Text Society.

  16. Sayers, E.E., 2010. Experience, authority, and the mediation of deafness: Chaucer’s Wife of Bath. In Disability in the Middle Ages, edited by Joshua Eyler, 81–92. Ashgate: Aldershot.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Seidenspinner-Nuñez, D., trans. 1998. The writings of Teresa de Cartagena. Cambridge, UK: Brewer.

  18. Svenberg, T., and P. Murray Jones, trans. and commentary. 2014. John Arderne, De arte Phisicali et de ciurgia. Stockholm: Fri Tanke Förlag.

  19. Turner, M. 2012. Thomas Usk and John Arderne. The Chaucer Review 47(1): 95–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Umiker-Seboek, J., and T.A. Seboek, eds. 1987. Monastic sign languages. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ware, L. 2009. Many possible futures, many different directions: Merging critical special education and disability studies. In Disability studies in education: Readings in theory and method, edited by S.L. Gabel, 103–124. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wogan-Browne, J., Watson, N., Taylor, A., and Evans, R. 1999. The idea of the vernacular. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathan Hsy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hsy, J. Symptom and Surface: Disruptive Deafness and Medieval Medical Authority. Bioethical Inquiry 13, 477–483 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-016-9744-y

Download citation

Keywords

  • Deafness
  • Disability
  • Medieval
  • Medicine
  • Literary theory
  • Literary analysis