Journal of Bioethical Inquiry

, Volume 13, Issue 4, pp 507–514 | Cite as

De-Privatizing Self-Harm: Remembering the Social Self in How to Forget

Symposium: Composing Disability
  • 256 Downloads

Abstract

This article reads Malu De Martino’s 2010 film Como Esqueçer (How to Forget) as a case study in self-harm as a mode of expression and self-inquiry. Drawing on disability and queer theory, psychoanalysis, and sociology of medicine, the author argues that How to Forget charts a “crip” epistemology of self-harm and theorizes a “social self.” That is to say, the film models an orientation towards self-harm that offers a coalitional and social therapeutic understanding. Based on this reading, the author suggests the application of practices of knowing-with, or knowing-in-relation as “cripistemology” to a broader therapeutic, research, and lay context.

Keywords

Body studies Critical health studies Medical sociology Self-harm Skin ego 

References

  1. Anzieu, D. 1989. The skin ego: A psychoanalytic approach to the self. Translated by C. Turner. New Haven: Yale University Press. Originally published as Le moi peau (Paris: Dunod, 1985).Google Scholar
  2. Brown, P. 1995. Naming and framing. In Perspectives in medical sociology, ed. P. Brown, 82–103. Long Grove: Waveland Press.Google Scholar
  3. Butler, J. 2004. Undoing gender. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Campello, M. 2003. Como esqueçer: Anotações quase Inglesas. Rio de Janiero: Sete Letras.Google Scholar
  5. Conrad, P. 2007. The medicalization of society: On the transformation of human conditions into treatable disorders. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Cooper, B. 2003. Sylvia Plath and the depression continuum. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 96(6): 296–301.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Cvetkovich, A. 2012. Depression: A public feeling. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. De Martino, M. 2010. Como esqueçer. London: Peccadillo Pictures.Google Scholar
  9. Grosz, E. 1994. Volatile bodies: Toward a corporeal feminism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Horwitz, A. 2007. Distinguishing distress from disorder as psychological outcomes of stressful social arrangements. Health: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness and Medicine 11(3): 273–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Irigaray, L. 2002. To speak is never neutral. Translated by G. Schwab. New York: Routledge. Originally published as Parler n’est jamais neutre (Paris: Les Editions de Minuit, 1985).Google Scholar
  12. Johnson, M.L., and R. McRuer. 2014. Cripistemologies: Introduction. Journal of Literary & Cultural Disability Studies 8(3): 127–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jutel, A.G. 2011. Putting a name to it: Diagnosis in contemporary society. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Luhrman, T.M. 2015. Redefining Mental Illness. The New York Times, January 17. http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/18/opinion/sunday/t-m-luhrmann-redefining-mental-illness.html. Accessed February 15, 2016.
  15. McRuer, R. 2006. Crip theory: Cultural signs of queerness and disability. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Motz, A. 2008. The psychology of female violence: Crimes against the body. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Puar, J.K. 2009. Prognosis time: Towards a geopolitics of affect, debility, and capacity. Women & Performance: A journal of feminist theory 19(2): 161–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Scarry, E. 1987. The body in pain: The making and unmaking of the world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Journal of Bioethical Inquiry Pty Ltd. 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EnglishThe George Washington UniversityWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations