Religious Scholars’ Attitudes and Views on Ethical Issues Pertaining to Pre-Implantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD) in Malaysia
- 766 Downloads
Pre-Implantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD) represents the first fusion of genomics and assisted reproduction and the first reproductive technology that allows prospective parents to screen and select the genetic characteristics of their potential offspring. However, for some, the idea that we can intervene in the mechanisms of human existence at such a fundamental level can be, at a minimum, worrying and, at most, repugnant. Religious doctrines particularly are likely to collide with the rapidly advancing capability for science to make such interventions. This paper focuses on opinions and arguments of selected religious scholars regarding ethical issues pertaining to PGD. In-depth interviews were conducted with religious scholars from three different religious organizations in the Klang Valley, Malaysia. Findings showed that Christian scholars are very sceptical of the long-term use of PGD because of its possible effect on the value of humanity and the parent-children relationship. This differs from Islamic scholars, who view PGD as God-given knowledge in medical science to further help humans understand medical genetics. For Buddhist scholars, PGD is considered to be new medical technology that can be used to save lives, avoid suffering, and bring happiness to those who need it. Our results suggest that it is important to include the opinions and views of religious scholars when it comes to new medical technologies such as PGD, as their opinions will have a significant impact on people from various faiths, particularly in a multi-religious country like Malaysia where society places high value on marital relationships and on the traditional concepts of family.
KeywordsPre-implantation genetic diagnosis Religious scholar Attitudes
The results of this study come from a research project entitled, “Ethical Implications of PGD: A qualitative study on three selected groups in Malaysia,” supported by a post-graduate grant (University of Malaya) [UM,TNC2/IPPP/UPGP/GRANT(PPP)/PS385/2010B] and publication grant DLP-2015-004. We thank all participants in this study for their time and efforts in the interviews.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
This study has no conflict of interest.
- Abdul Majeed Alaro, A.R. 2010. Assisted reproductive technology (ART): The Islamic law perspective. In Islam and bioethics, edited by B. Arda and V. Rispler-Claim, 85–97. Ankara University.Google Scholar
- Abdul Rahman, N.A. 2008. The Muslim religious elite of Singapore. In Religious diversity in Singapore, ed. A.E. Lai, 248–274. Singapore: ISEAS; LYKSPP;IPS.Google Scholar
- Abraham, C. 2012. Unnatural selection: Is evolving reproductive technology ushering in a new age of eugenics? Saturday’s Globe and Mail, January 17. www.theglobalandmail.com/life/parenting/unnatural-selection-is-evolving-reproductive-technology-ushering-in-a-new-age-of-eugenics/articles1357885/?[age=all.
- Cole-Turner, R. 2003. Religious meets research. In God and the embryo: Religious voices on stem cells and cloning, ed. B. Waters and R. Cole-Turner, 7–18. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
- Colombo, R. 2005. The status and rights of the human embryo and fetus. In The embryo: Scientific discovery and medical ethics, ed. S. Blazer and E.Z. Zimmer, 40–52. Basel: Karger.Google Scholar
- Crawford, C.S. 2003. Hindu ethics. In Hindu bioethics for the twenty-first century, 11–30. State University of New York, N.Y.Google Scholar
- Dutney, A. 2007. Religion, infertility and assisted reproductive technology. Best Practice & Research: Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology 21(1): 160–180.Google Scholar
- Fadel, H.E. 2007. Pre-implantation genetic diagnosis: Rationale and ethics, an Islamic perspective. Journal of the Indian Medical Association 39(4): 150–157.Google Scholar
- Frazetto, G. 2004. Embryos, cells and God. The European Molecular Biology Organisation Report 5(6): 553–555.Google Scholar
- Harvey, P. 2008. A Buddhist perspective on pre-implantation genetic diagnosis. BioNews. www.bionews.org.uk/page-38031.asp.
- Hug, K. 2006. Therapeutic perspective of human embryonic stem cell research versus the moral status of a human embryo—Does one have to be compromised for the other? Medicina (Kaunas) 42(2): 107–114.Google Scholar
- Jones, Jr. H.W. 1999. New reproductive technologies. Best Practice and Research Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology 13(4): 473–490.Google Scholar
- Jones, G. 2004. Playing God. Scientific, ethical and technological challenges. http://www.faraday.st-edmunds.cam.ac.uk/CIS/st-edmunds/jones/pdf/jones_lecture.pdf 22nd June, 2004, St.Edmund College, Cambridge
- Keown, D. 2000. Contemporary Buddhist ethics. Surrey, UK: Curzon.Google Scholar
- Kurjak, A., J.M. Carrere, and F.A. Chervenak. 2009. The ethical concept of the fetus as a patient and the beginning of human life. Periodicum Biologorum 111(3): 341–438.Google Scholar
- Mahmoud, F. 2010. Assisted reproductive technology (ART)-ethics, religion and the law. Sri Lanka Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 32(3): 49–52.Google Scholar
- Mills, C.W. 1959. The power elite. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Moore, K.L., E.M. Johnson, T.V.N. Persaud, G.C. Goeringer, Z. Abdul-Majeed, and M.A. Ahmed. 1981. Human developments as described in Khur’an and Sunnah. In Some evidence for the truth of Islam, 5th ed. Philadephia: Saunders with Dar al-Qiblah for Islamic Literature. Jeddah.Google Scholar
- Petersen, T.S. 2005. Just diagnosis? Preimplantation genetic diagnosis and injustices to disabled people. Journal of Medical Ethics 31(4): 231–234.Google Scholar
- Roberts, M., 2009. Is the embryo sacrosanct? Faith in pre-implantation genetic diagnosis. Bionews. www.bionews.org.uk/page-38043.asp.
- Saunders, P. 2006. The moral status of the embryo. Nucleus Summer: 17–26. http://www.cmf.org.uk/publications/content/?context=article&id=1811. Accessed January 10, 2012.
- Serour, G.I. 2005. Religious perspectives on ethical issues in ART. Middle East Fertility Society Journal 10(3): 185–190.Google Scholar
- Sinclair, K. 2008. Is the embryo sacrosanct? Multi-faith perspectives. BioNews. http://www.bionews.org.uk/page_38036.asp.
- Tang, A. 2008. Biomedical ethical decision-making. http://www.kairos2.com/reproductive_tech.htm.
- Volster, J.M. 2011. A Christian ethical perspective on the moral status of human embryo. Acta Theologica 31(1): 189–204.Google Scholar