Skip to main content

The Extension of Belgium’s Euthanasia Law to Include Competent Minors


Following considerable debate, the practice of euthanasia was legalized in Belgium in 2002, thereby making Belgium one of the few places in the world where this practice is legal. In 2014 the law was amended for the first time. The 2014 amendment makes euthanasia legally possible for all minors who repeatedly and voluntarily request euthanasia and who are judged to possess “capacity of discernment” (regardless of their biological age), as well as fulfil a number of other criteria of due care. This extension of the 2002 euthanasia law generated a lot of national and international debate and has been applauded by many and heavily criticized by others. This evolution is clearly of interest to end-of-life debates in the entire world. This paper will therefore describe how this amendment came to get passed using official documents from Belgium's Senate and Chamber of Representatives where this amendment was discussed and subsequently passed. Next, some of the most commonly given arguments in favour of the law are identified, as well as the arguments most often voiced against the amendment. All these arguments will be expanded upon and it will be examined whether they hold up to ethical scrutiny. Analysing the official documents and identifying the most commonly voiced arguments gives valuable insight into how Belgium came to amend its euthanasia law and why it did so in 2014. It also becomes clear that although the current amendment is often seen as far-reaching, more radical ideas were proposed during the drafting of the law. Also, in analysing those arguments in favour of the amendment and those against, it is clear that the validity of some of these is questionable.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.


  1. 1.

    For a detailed discussion on the history and content of Belgium’s 2002 euthanasia law, see Griffiths, Weyers, and Adams (2008).

  2. 2.

    This is a special provision in Belgian law according to which in certain rare circumstances, a person who is legally a minor (but older than fifteen) can nevertheless be “emancipated” or legally considered an adult (in Dutch “ontvoogd”). One becomes emancipated through marriage or by declaration of a youth court. An emancipated minor has more decisional authority than a minor (mostly in terms of financial rights), but still not the same as an adult.

  3. 3.

    For better understanding of this paper, a brief word explaining Belgium’s governmental structure. Belgium has a bicameral legislature in which, at the time when this law was debated, ethical laws were first discussed in the Belgian Senate (at which time various amendments can be proposed) after which an agreed draft was sent to the Chamber of Representatives, where, in turn, the law was further discussed and amended. The Chamber of Representatives has the capacity to eventually pass the law which is then, symbolically, signed by the King of the Belgians. More recently, the role of the Belgian Senate has been changed and diminished, but this is not relevant here.

  4. 4.

    This study looked at euthanasia for children aged one to seventeen, so this may include patients who were never able to make a request due to their young age.


  1. Act amending the Act of 28 May 2002 on euthanasia, sanctioning euthanasia for minors. 2014. Belgian Official Gazette, number 2014009093: 21053.

  2. Andrews, C. 2014. Child euthanasia bill is “counsel of despair,” says bioethicist. Interview with Prof. David Albert Jones., February 2014. Accessed June 23, 2015.

  3. Belgian Chamber of Representatives. 2014. Integral report with translated summary report of the speeches. CRIV 53. PLEN 185. Accessed June 23, 2015.

  4. Belgian Senate. 2000. Amendement voor wetsvoorstel betreffende de euthanasie. Document number 2-244/3. Accessed June 23, 2015.

  5. Belgian Senate. 2001. Bijlage bij wetsvoorstel betreffende de euthanasie. Document number 2-244/24. Accessed June 23, 2015.

  6. Belgian Senate. 2004. Wetsvoorstel tot wijziging van de wet van 28 mei 2002 betreffende de euthanasie. Document number 3-804/1. Accessed June 23, 2015.

  7. Belgian Senate. 2006. Wetsvoorstel tot aanvulling van de wet van 28 mei 2002 betreffende de euthanasie wat betreft minderjarigen. Document number 3-1993/1. Accessed June 23, 2015.

  8. Belgian Senate. 2010a. Wetsvoorstel tot wijziging van de wet van 28 mei 2002 betreffende de euthanasie wat minderjarigen van vijftien jaar en ouder betreft. Document number 5-179/1. Accessed June 23, 2015.

  9. Belgian Senate. 2010b. Wetsvoorstel tot wijziging van artikel 3 van de wet van 28 mei 2002 betreffende de euthanasie, inzake euthanasie bij minderjarigen. Document number 5-21/1. Accessed June 23, 2015.

  10. Belgian Senate. 2012. Wetsvoorstel tot aanvulling van de wet van 28 mei 2002 betreffende de euthanasie, wat minderjarigen betreft. Document number 5-1610/1. Accessed June 23, 2015.

  11. Belgian Senate. 2013a. Annex to Wetsvoorstel tot wijziging van de wet van 28 mei 2002 betreffende de euthanasie teneinde euthanasie voor minderjarigen mogelijk te maken. Document number 5-2170/8. Accessed June 23, 2015.

  12. Belgian Senate. 2013b. Wetsvoorstel tot wijziging van de wet van 28 mei 2002 betreffende de euthanasie teneinde euthanasie voor minderjarigen mogelijk te maken. Document number 5-2170/1. Accessed June 23, 2015.

  13. Belgian Senate. 2013c. Verslag namens de verenigde commissies voor de justitie en voor de sociale aangelegenheden. Document number 5-2170/4. Accessed June 23, 2015.

  14. Broeckaert, B., J. Gielen, T. Van Iersel, and S. Van den Branden. 2009. The attitude of Flemish palliative care physicians to euthanasia and assisted suicide: An empirical study. Ethical Perspectives 16(3): 311–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bruggeman, F. 2015. Nog geen enkel geval van euthanasie op minderjarigen., April 22. Accessed June 23, 2015

  16. Daly, P. 2015. Palliative sedation, foregoing life-sustaining treatment, and aid-in-dying: What is the difference? Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 36(3): 197–213.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Federale Controle- en Evaluatiecommissie Euthanasie. 2014. Zesde verslag aan de wetgevende kamers (2012–2013). Accessed June 23, 2015.

  18. Griffiths, J., H. Weyers, and M. Adams. 2008. Euthanasia and law in Europe. Portland: Hart Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hope, T. 2014. Morality, science, and Belgium’s child euthanasia law. OUP Blog, May 23. Accessed June 23, 2015.

  20. Kamm, F. 1998. Physician-assisted suicide, euthanasia, and intending death. In Physician assisted suicide: Expanding the debate, edited by M. Battin, R. Rhodes, and A. Silvers, 28–62. New York: Routledge.

  21. Kidd, D., trans. 2002. The Belgian Act on euthanasia of May, 28th 2002. Ethical Perspectives 9(2–3): 182–188

  22. Mee, S., B.G. Bunney, C. Reist, S.G. Potkin, and W.E. Bunney. 2006. Psychological pain: A review of evidence. Journal of Psychiatric Research 40(8): 680–690.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Mortier, F. 2003. Euthanasie bij minderjarigen. In Euthanasie: Nieuwe knelpunten in een voortgezette discussie, edited by M. Adams, J. Griffiths, and G. den Hartogh, 199–220. Kampen: Uitgeverij Kok.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Onwuteaka-Philipsen, B., A. Brinkman-Stoppelenburg, C. Penning, G.J.F. de Jong-Krul, J.J. van Delden, and A. van der Heide. 2012. Trends in end-of-life practices before and after the enactment of the euthanasia law in the Netherlands from 1990 to 2010: A repeated cross-sectional survey. The Lancet 380(9845): 908–915.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Otlowski, M. 2000. Voluntary euthanasia and the common law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  26. Palmer, R., and G. Gillespie. 2014. Consent and capacity in children and young people. Archives of Disease in Childhood Education & Practice Edition 99(1): 2–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Parliamentary Assembly. 2014. Legalisation of euthanasia for children in Belgium. Written declaration No. 567. Doc. 13414. Accessed June 23, 2015.

  28. Patients’ Rights Act. 2002. Belgian Official Gazette, number 2002022737: 43719.

  29. Pool, R. 2004. “You’re not going to dehydrate mom, are you?” Euthanasia, versterving, and good death in the Netherlands. Social Science & Medicine 58(5): 955–966.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Pousset, G., J. Bilsen, J. Cohen, K. Chambaere, L. Deliens, and F. Mortier. 2010. Medical end-of-life decisions in children in Flanders, Belgium: A population-based post-mortem survey. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine 164(6): 547–553.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Pousset, G., F. Mortier, J. Bilsen, J. Cohen, and L. Deliens. 2011a. Attitudes and practices of physicians regarding physician-assisted dying in minors. Archives of Disease in Childhood 96(10): 948–953.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Pousset, G., J. Bilsen, J. Cohen, F. Mortier, and L. Deliens. 2011b. Continuous deep sedation at the end of life of children in Flanders, Belgium. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 41(2): 449–455.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Rachels, J. 1975. Active and passive euthanasia. The New England Journal of Medicine 292(2): 78–80.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Seale, C. 2009. End-of-life decisions in the UK involving medical practitioners. Palliative Medicine 23(3): 198–204.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Siegel, A.M., D.A. Sisti, and A.A. Caplan. 2014. Pediatric euthanasia in Belgium: Disturbing developments. The Journal of the American Medical Association 311(19): 1963–1964.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Singer, P. 2003. Voluntary euthanasia: A utilitarian perspective. Bioethics 17(5–6): 526–541.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Smith, W.J. 2014. A bioethicist’s farcical case for child euthanasia. LifeSiteNews, June 17, Opinion section. Accessed June 23, 2015.

  38. Traynor, I. 2014. Belgian law on euthanasia for children, with no age limit, will be first in world. The Guardian, February 12, World News section. Accessed June 23, 2015.

  39. van Berlaer, G., E. Duval, S. Debulpaep, et al. 2013. Haal levenseinde voor minderjarigen uit het duister. De Morgen, November 6, Opinion section. Accessed June 23, 2015.

  40. Van der Heide, A., L. Deliens, K. Faisst, et al. 2003. End-of-life decision-making in six European countries: Descriptive study. The Lancet 362(9381): 345–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Verhagen, E., and P.J.J. Sauer. 2005. The Groningen protocol—euthanasia in severely ill newborns. The New England Journal of Medicine 352(10): 959–962.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kasper Raus.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Raus, K. The Extension of Belgium’s Euthanasia Law to Include Competent Minors. Bioethical Inquiry 13, 305–315 (2016).

Download citation


  • Euthanasia
  • Minors
  • Belgium
  • Ethical reflections