Journal of Bioethical Inquiry

, Volume 13, Issue 1, pp 105–115 | Cite as

The Case for Reasonable Accommodation of Conscientious Objections to Declarations of Brain Death

Original Research


Since its inception in 1968, the concept of whole-brain death has been contentious, and four decades on, controversy concerning the validity and coherence of whole-brain death continues unabated. Although whole-brain death is legally recognized and medically entrenched in the United States and elsewhere, there is reasonable disagreement among physicians, philosophers, and the public concerning whether brain death is really equivalent to death as it has been traditionally understood. A handful of states have acknowledged this plurality of viewpoints and enacted “conscience clauses” that require “reasonable accommodation” of religious and moral objections to the determination of death by neurological criteria. This paper argues for the universal adoption of “reasonable accommodation” policies using the New Jersey statute as a model, in light of both the ongoing controversy and the recent case of Jahi McMath, a child whose family raised religious objections to a declaration of brain death. Public policies that accommodate reasonable, divergent viewpoints concerning death provide a practical and compassionate way to resolve those conflicts that are the most urgent, painful, and difficult to reconcile.


Brain death Death Conscientious objection Reasonable accommodation 


  1. Ad Hoc Committee of the Harvard Medical School to Examine the Definition of Brain Death. 1968. A definition of irreversible coma. The Journal of the American Medical Association 205(6): 337–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. BBC News. 2013. Jahi McMath, “brain dead” US girl: Life support extended. BBC News, December 31. Accessed January 24, 2014.
  3. Bernat, J.L. 1998. A defense of the whole-brain concept of death. The Hastings Center Report 28(2): 14–23.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bernat, J.L. 2005. The concept and practice of brain death. In The boundaries of consciousness: Neurobiology and neuropathology, edited by S. Laureys, 369–379. Amsterdam: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Capron, H.M. 2001. Brain death: Well settled yet still unresolved. The New England Journal of Medicine 344(16): 1244–1246.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Engelhardt, H.T. 1986. The foundations of bioethics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Fields, L. 2013. Mom of girl on life support: “I can’t let them kill my baby a second time.” ABC News, December 22. Accessed January 24, 2014.
  8. Ford, D. 2013. Jahi McMath’s family seeks to move brain-dead girl to another facility. CNN Health, December 26. Accessed January 24, 2014.
  9. Halevy, A. 2001. Beyond brain death? Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 26(5): 493–501.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Halevy, A., and B. Brody. 1993. Brain death: Reconciling definitions, criteria, and tests. Annals of Internal Medicine 119(6): 519–525.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. HHC Ethics Network. No date. Brain death and reasonable accommodation. New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation. Accessed January 24, 2014.
  12. Johnson, L.S.M. 2014. A legal fiction with real consequences. American Journal of Bioethics 14(8): 34–36.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Keown, D. 2005. End of life: The Buddhist view. The Lancet 366(9489): 952–955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Larue, C., J. DeJong, M.P. Schlosser, et al. 2013. A survey to determine public opinion regarding whether brain death is death and should allow vital organ donation. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine.
  15. Lupkin, S. 2014. Why Jahi McMath’s mom is sure her daughter isn’t brain dead. ABC News, December 16. Accessed December 16, 2014.
  16. Machado, C. 2007. Brain death: A reappraisal. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  17. Miller, F.G., and R.D. Truog. 2009. The incoherence of determining death by neurological criteria: A commentary on Controversies in the determination of death, a white paper by the President’s Council on Bioethics. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 19(2): 185–193.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. National Health Service. 2012. Brain death. Accessed January 24, 2014.
  19. New York State Department of Health and New York State Task Force on Life and the Law. 2011. Guidelines for determining brain death. Accessed January 24, 2014.
  20. Onishi, N. 2014. A brain is dead, a heart beats on. The New York Times, January 4, A10.Google Scholar
  21. Padela, A.I., A. Arozullah, and E. Moosa. 2013. Brain death in Islamic ethico-legal deliberation: Challenges for applied Islamic bioethics. Bioethics 27(3): 132–139.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. President’s Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research. 1981. Defining death: Medical, legal and ethical issues in the determination of death. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  23. President’s Council on Bioethics. 2008. Controversies in the determination of death. Washington, DC. Accessed January 24, 2014.
  24. Schuchman, A.D. 1998. The holy and the handicapped: An examination of the different applications of the reasonable-accommodation clauses in Title VII and the ADA. Indiana Law Journal 73(2): 745–764.Google Scholar
  25. Shah, S.K., and F.G. Miller. 2010. Can we handle the truth? Legal fictions in the determination of death. American Journal of Law & Medicine 36(4): 540–585.Google Scholar
  26. Shewmon, D.A. 1998. Chronic “brain death”: Meta-analysis and conceptual consequences. Neurology 51(6): 1538–1545.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Shewmon, D.A. 2001. The brain and somatic integration: Insights into the standard biological rationale for equating “brain death” with death. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 26(5): 457–478.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Sibley, W.M. 1953. The rational versus the reasonable. The Philosophical Review 62(4): 554–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Siminoff, L.A., C. Burant, and S.J. Youngner. 2004. Death and organ procurement: Public beliefs and attitudes. Social Science & Medicine 59(11): 2325–2334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Truog, R.D. 2007. Brain death—too flawed to endure, too ingrained to abandon. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 35(2): 273–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. 2002. Enforcement guidance: Reasonable accommodation and undue hardship under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Accessed January 24, 2014.
  32. Veatch, R.M. 2014. Comments to An ICU nurse discusses brain death. Bioethics Forum. Accessed January 24, 2014.
  33. Veatch, R.M. 2005. The death of whole-brain death: The plague of the disaggregators, somaticists, and mentalists. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30(4): 353–378.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Wijdicks, E.F.M. 2002. Brain death worldwide: Accepted fact but no global consensus in diagnostic criteria. Neurology 58(1): 20–25.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Journal of Bioethical Inquiry Pty Ltd. 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Humanities DepartmentMichigan Technological UniversityHoughtonUSA

Personalised recommendations