Journal of Bioethical Inquiry

, Volume 12, Issue 4, pp 545–547

When Lack of Evidence Is Evidence of Lack

Commentary

Abstract

In their recent article “A Gentle Ethical Defence of Homeopathy,” Levy, Gadd, Kerridge, and Komesaroff use the claim that “lack of evidence is not equivalent to evidence of lack” as a component of their ethical defence of homeopathy. In response, this article argues that they cannot use this claim to shore up their ethical arguments. This is because it is false.

Keywords

Absence of evidence Evidence of absence Homeopathy Vulcan (hypothetical planet) 

References

  1. Baum, R., and W. Sheehan. 1997. In search of Planet Vulcan: The ghost in Newton’s clockwork universe. New York and London: Plenum Trade.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Fontenrose, R. 1973. In search of Vulcan. Journal for the History of Astronomy IV: 145–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Levy, D., B. Gadd, I. Kerridge, and P.A. Komesaroff. 2015. A gentle ethical defence of homeopathy. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 12(2): 203–209. doi:10.1007/s11673-014-9563-y.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Journal of Bioethical Inquiry Pty Ltd. 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Bioethics Centre Te Pakapū Matatika Koiora, Division of Health SciencesDunedinNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations