Journal of Bioethical Inquiry

, Volume 12, Issue 4, pp 545–547

When Lack of Evidence Is Evidence of Lack


DOI: 10.1007/s11673-015-9675-z

Cite this article as:
Pickering, N. Bioethical Inquiry (2015) 12: 545. doi:10.1007/s11673-015-9675-z


In their recent article “A Gentle Ethical Defence of Homeopathy,” Levy, Gadd, Kerridge, and Komesaroff use the claim that “lack of evidence is not equivalent to evidence of lack” as a component of their ethical defence of homeopathy. In response, this article argues that they cannot use this claim to shore up their ethical arguments. This is because it is false.


Absence of evidence Evidence of absence Homeopathy Vulcan (hypothetical planet) 

Copyright information

© Journal of Bioethical Inquiry Pty Ltd. 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Bioethics Centre Te Pakapū Matatika Koiora, Division of Health SciencesDunedinNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations