Journal of Bioethical Inquiry

, Volume 12, Issue 4, pp 555–559

Vaccine Refusal and Trust: The Trouble With Coercion and Education and Suggestions for a Cure

Critical Perspectives

Abstract

There can be little doubt about the ethical imperative to ensure adequate vaccination uptake against certain infectious diseases. In the face of vaccine refusal, health authorities and providers instinctively appeal to coercive approaches or increased education as methods to ensure adequate vaccine uptake. Recently, some have argued that public fear around Ebola should be used as an opportunity for such approaches, should an Ebola vaccine become available. In this article, the author describes the difficulties associated with coercion and education when addressing vaccine opposition. Both coercion and education can cause opposite effects than intended in certain circumstances. The correct area of focus is to address the breakdown in trust within clinical relationships. The author presents suggestions for an approach towards vaccine refusal that may be more promising.

Keywords

Vaccination Vaccine refusal Public health 

References

  1. Allen, A. 2007. Vaccine: The controversial story of medicine’s greatest lifesaver. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  2. Brown, B. 2014. Using the Ebola outbreak as an opportunity to educate on vaccine utility. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 11(4): 415–416.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown, K.F., J.S. Kroll, M.J. Hudson, et al. 2010. Factors underlying parental decisions about combination childhood vaccinations including MMR: A systematic review. Vaccine 28(26): 4235–4248.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Kata, A. 2010. A postmodern Pandora’s box: Anti-vaccination misinformation on the Internet. Vaccine 28(7): 1709–1716.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Leask, J., S. Chapman, P. Hawe, and M. Burgess. 2006. What maintains parental support for vaccination when challenged by anti-vaccination messages? A qualitative study. Vaccine 24(49–50): 7238–7245.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Moss, W.J., and D.E. Griffin. 2012. Measles. The Lancet 379(9811): 153–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Nyhan, B., J. Reifler, S. Richey, and G.L. Freed. 2014. Effective messages in vaccine promotion: a randomized trial. Pediatrics 133(4): e835–e842.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Omer, S.B., D.A. Salmon, W.A. Orenstein, P. deHart, and N. Halsey. 2009. Vaccine refusal, mandatory immunization, and the risks of vaccine-preventable diseases. The New England Journal of Medicine 360(19): 1981–1988.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ross, L.F., and T.J. Aspinwall. 1997. Religious exemptions to the immunization statutes: Balancing public health and religious freedom. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 25(2–3): 202–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Simone, B., P. Carrillo-Santisteve, and P.L. Lopalco. 2012. Healthcare workers’ role in keeping MMR vaccination uptake high in Europe: A review of evidence. Euro Surveillance 17(26): pii=20206. http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId=20206.

Copyright information

© Journal of Bioethical Inquiry Pty Ltd. 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department for Ethics, Humanities & Spiritual Care, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland and Centre for Applied EthicsUniversity of StellenboschStellenboschSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations