Journal of Bioethical Inquiry

, Volume 12, Issue 4, pp 699–708

The Restorative Role of Apology in Resolving Medical Disputes: Lessons From Chinese Legal Culture

Original Research

Abstract

This article is the first exploration of the Chinese notion of apology from a comparative legal perspective. By reviewing the significance of apology in the context of Chinese culture, the article presents a three-dimensional structure of apology that, in contrast to the understanding the research community now has, defines acknowledgement of fault, admission of responsibility, and offer of reparation as three essential elements of an apology. It is the combination of these three elements that enables apology to serve as a form of reparation. The article further places the three-dimensional apology in the context of the Chinese concept of “the relations of humanity,” arguing that an apology accompanying admission of fault and responsibility may help to restore the harmony of relations and, by so doing, resolve medical disputes positively.

Keywords

Apology law Structure of apology Restorative role of apology Medical dispute 

References

  1. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care (ACSQHC). 2012. Open disclosure standard: Review report. Sydney: ACSQHC. http://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Open-Disclosure-Standard-Review-Report-Final-Jun-2012.pdf.
  2. Australian Health Ministers Advisory Council (AHMAC) Legal Process Reform Group. 2002. Responding to the medical indemnity crisis: An integrated reform package. Canberra: ACT Health. http://pandora.nla.gov.au/pan/32060/20021209-0000/www.health.act.gov.au/publications/medicalindemnity/report.pdf.
  3. Alberstein, M., and N. Davidovitch. 2011. Apologies in the healthcare system: From clinical medicine to public health. Law and Contemporary Problems 74(3): 151–176.Google Scholar
  4. Bismark, M. 2009. The power of apology. The New Zealand Medical Journal 122(1304): 96–106.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bismark, M., and E. Dauer. 2006. Motivations for medico-legal action. Journal of Legal Medicine 27(1): 55–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bismark, M., and R. Paterson. 2005. “Doing the right thing” after an adverse event. The New Zealand Medical Journal 118(1219): 55–60.Google Scholar
  7. Bolstad, M. 2000. Learning from Japan: The case for increased use of apology in mediation. Cleveland State Law Review 48(3): 545–578.Google Scholar
  8. Braithwaite, J. 2002. Restorative justice and responsive regulation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Carroll, R. 2013. Apologies as a legal remedy. Sydney Law Review 35(2): 317–347.Google Scholar
  10. Carroll, R. 2014. When “sorry” is the hardest word to say, how might apology legislation assist? Hong Kong Law Journal 44(2): 491–517.Google Scholar
  11. Cohen, J. 1999. Advising clients to apologize. Southern California Law Review 72: 1009–1069.Google Scholar
  12. Cohen, J. 2004. Toward candor after medical error: The first apology law. Harvard Health Policy Review 5(1): 21–24.Google Scholar
  13. Davenport, A. 2006. Forgive and forget: Recognition of error and use of apology as preemptive steps to ADR or litigation in medical malpractice cases. Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal 6(1): 81–107.Google Scholar
  14. Deng, W., and W. Gao. 2011. Chanfu shunchan santian hou liqi siwang [Three days after eutocia: The mother dies mysteriously]. Nanfang Ribao [Nanfang Daily], November 12, 7.Google Scholar
  15. Foucault, M. 2014. Wrong-doing, truth-telling: The function of avowal in justice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gallagher, T.H., A.D. Waterman, A.G. Ebers, V.J. Fraser, and W. Levinson. 2003. Patients’ and physicians’ attitudes regarding the disclosure of medical errors. The Journal of the American Medical Association 289(8): 1001–1007.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gallagher, T.H., A.D. Waterman, A.G. Ebers, V.J. Fraser, and W. Levinson. 2007. Disclosing harmful medical errors to patients. The New England Journal of Medicine 356(26): 2713–2719.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gray, W., and H.R. Zheng. 1989. General principles of civil law of the People’s Republic of China. Law and Contemporary Problems 52(2): 27–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Haley, J.O. 1982. Sheathing the sword of justice in Japan: An essay on law without sanctions. Journal of Japanese Studies 8(2): 265–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Haley, J.O. 1994. Authority without power: Law and the Japanese paradox. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Haley, J.O. 2009. Comment on using criminal punishment to serve both victim and social needs. Law and Contemporary Problems 72(2): 219–225.Google Scholar
  22. He, L. 2012. Shi yiyuan bi wo nao [The hospital forces me to shout]. Xinmin Zhoukan [Xinmin Weekly] 21: 30–35.Google Scholar
  23. Huang, S. 2012. Yiliaojiufen yin maodun, Dongguan Humen liangqianmin qunzhong gongda menzhen [Triggered by medical dispute: Two thousands besiege out-patient department in Humen]. Nanfang Ribao [Nanfang Daily], September 28. http://news.xinhuanet.com/legal/2012-09/28/c_123776321.htm.
  24. Humen Branch, Dongguan Municipal Bureau of City Administration and Law Enforcement. 2012. Wozhen tongbao yin yiliaojiufen yinfa qunzhong jujishijian qingkuang [Circular on the mass gathering event triggered by medical dispute in Humen]. http://www.hmzf.gov.cn/article/show/1224.aspx. Accessed July 13, 2015.
  25. Iedema, R., R. Sorenson, E. Manias, et al. 2008. Patients’ and family members’ experiences of open disclosure following adverse events. International Journal for Quality in Health Care 20(6): 421–432.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jones, W. 1989. Sources of Chinese obligation law. Law and Contemporary Problems 52(3): 69–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Johnstone, G. 2011. Restorative justice: Ideas, values, debates, 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Johnstone, G., and D. Ness, eds. 2007. Handbook of restorative justice. Devon: Willan Publishing.Google Scholar
  29. Kellett, A.J. 1987. Healing angry wounds: The roles of apology and mediation in disputes between physicians and patients. Journal of Dispute Resolution 1987(January): 111–131.Google Scholar
  30. Latif, E. 2001. Apologetic justice: Evaluating apologies tailored toward legal solutions. Boston University Law Review 81(1): 289–320.Google Scholar
  31. Lazare, A. 1995. Go ahead, say you’re sorry: Apologies can restore relationships—but there’s a right way and a wrong way to do them. Psychology Today 28(1): 40–43, 76, 78.Google Scholar
  32. Lazare, A. 2004. On apology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Lazare, A. 2006. Apology in medical practice: An emerging clinical skill. The Journal of the American Medical Association 296(11): 1401–1404.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lee, I. 2005. The law and culture of the apology in Korean dispute settlement (with Japan and the United States in mind). Michigan Journal of International Law 27(1): 1–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Levi, D.L. 1997. The role of apology in mediation. New York University Law Review 72(5): 1165–1210.Google Scholar
  36. Legge, J. 1885. The sacred books of China: The texts of Confucianism, part IV, the LÎ KÎ. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  37. Legge, J. 1932. The four books: Confucian analects, the great learning, the doctrine of the mean, and the works of Mencius, with English translation and notes. Shanghai: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar
  38. Madden, B., and J. McIlwraith. 2013. Australian medical liability, 2nd ed. Sydney: LexisNexis.Google Scholar
  39. Mastroianni, A.C., M.M. Mello, S. Sommer, M. Hardy, and T.H. Gallagher. 2010. The flaws in state “apology” and “disclosure” laws dilute their intended impact on malpractice suits. Health Affairs 29(9): 1611–1619.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. McDonnell, W.M., and E. Guenther. 2008. Narrative review: Do state laws make it easier to say “I’m sorry?” Annals of Internal Medicine 149(11): 811–815.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. O’Hara, E.A. 2004. Apology and thick trust: What spouse abusers and negligent doctors might have in common. Chicago-Kent Law Review 79(3): 1055–1089.Google Scholar
  42. Orenstein, A.A. 1999. Apology excepted: Incorporating a feminist analysis into evidence policy where you would least expect it. Southwestern University Law Review 28(2): 221–279.Google Scholar
  43. Robbennolt, J.K. 2003. Apologies and legal settlement: An empirical examination. Michigan Law Review 102(3): 460–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Robbennolt, J.K. 2005. What we know and don’t know about the role of apologies in resolving health care disputes. Georgia State University Law Review 21: 1009–1027.Google Scholar
  45. Robbennolt, J.K. 2008. Attorneys, apologies, and settlement negotiation. Harvard Negotiation Law Review 13: 349–397.Google Scholar
  46. Roth, J.K. 2005. Ethics, revised ed. Pasadena: Salem Press.Google Scholar
  47. Runnels, M.B. 2009. Apologies all around: Advocating federal protection for the full apology in civil cases. San Diego Law Review 46(1): 137–160.Google Scholar
  48. Shuman, D.W. 2000. The role of apology in tort law. Judicature 83(4): 180–189.Google Scholar
  49. Supreme People’s Court of the People’s Republic of China (SPC). 2014. Zuigaorenminfayuan guanyu shenli liyong xinxi wangluo qinhai renshenquanyi minshi jiufen anjian shiyong falv ruogan wenti de guiding [Provisions of the Supreme People’s Court on several issues concerning the application of law in the trial of cases involving civil disputes over infringements upon personal rights and interests through information networks] Interpretation No 11, 23 June 2014.Google Scholar
  50. Taft, L. 2000. Apology subverted: The commodification of apology. Yale Law Journal 109(5): 1135–1160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Taft, L. 2005a. Apology within a moral dialectic: A reply to Professor Robbennolt. Michigan Law Review 103(5): 1010–1017.Google Scholar
  52. Taft, L. 2005b. Apology and medical mistake: Opportunity or foil? Annals of Health Law 14(1): 55–94.Google Scholar
  53. Taft, L. 2013. When more than sorry matters. Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal 13(1): 181–204.Google Scholar
  54. Taylor, R.L. 2005. The illustrated encyclopedia of Confucianism. New York: The Rosen Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  55. Tavuchis, N. 1991. Mea culpa: A sociology of apology and reconciliation. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Tian, X. 2011. Fuqin lai kanbing, que liqi qushi: yisheng zhuanggao ziji suo zai yiyuan yao qi rencuo [Doctor sues the hospital where she works: Asking for an acknowledgement of negligence]. Xiandai Kuaibao [Modern Express], December 8, F5.Google Scholar
  57. Vines, P. 2005. Apologising to avoid liability: Cynical civility or practical morality? Sydney Law Review 27(3): 483–505.Google Scholar
  58. Vines, P. 2007. The power of apology: Mercy, forgiveness or corrective justice in the civil liability arena. Public Space: The Journal of Law and Social Justice 1(1): 1–51.Google Scholar
  59. Vines, P. 2013. The protected apology as the modern response to the moral question at the heart of Donoghue v Stevenson: What if Stevenson had apologised. Juridical Review: Law Journal of Scottish Universities 3: 483–500.Google Scholar
  60. Wagatsuma, H., and A. Rosett. 1986. The implications of apology: Law and culture in Japan and the United States. Law and Society Review 20(4): 461–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wang, L. 2003. Minfa zongze yanjiu [Studies on general principles of civil law]. Beijing: China Renmin University Press.Google Scholar
  62. XinhuaNews. 2010. Zhangjiagang tuoshan chuzhi yiqi yiliaojiufen yinfa de qunzhongjiju shijian [The authorities handled a mass gathering event triggered by medical dispute in Zhangjiagang]. Xinhuawang [Xinhuanet], December 5. http://www3.xinhuanet.com/chinanews/2010-12/05/content_21556040.htm.
  63. Xu, S., and Y. Duan. 1981. Shuowen Jiezi zhu [Explaining and analysing characters]. Shanghai: Shanghai Classic Publishing House.Google Scholar
  64. Xu, X. 1994. Zhong Ri gudai fuchou wenti bijiao [A comparative study of revenge in traditional China and Japan]. Bijiaofa Yanjiu [Journal of Comparative Law] 8(2): 43–54.Google Scholar
  65. Zhang, Y., and T. Chen, eds. 2002. Kangxi Zidian [Kangxi dictionary]. Shanghai: Publishing House of Chinese Dictionary.Google Scholar

Cases A

  1. 《北京金山安全软件有限公司与周鸿祎侵犯名誉权纠纷案》[Beijing Kingsoft Security Software Co Ltd v Zhou Hongyi—Dispute over the Infringement of the Right of Reputation], 北京市第一中级人民法院 [First Intermediate People’s Court of Beijing Municipality, People’s Republic of China], 一中民终字第09328号 [Civil Appeal No 09328], 25 August 2011.Google Scholar
  2. 《徐大雯诉宋祖德、刘信达名誉纠纷案》[Xu Dawen v Song Zude & Liu Xinda—Dispute over the Infringement of the Right of Reputation], 上海市静安区人民法院 [Jing’an District People’s Court of Shanghai Municipality, People’s Republic of China], 静民一(民)初字第779号 [Civil First Trial No 779], 25 December 2009.Google Scholar
  3. 《赵雅芝与上海琪姿贸易有限公司、上海诺宝丝化妆品有限公司侵害姓名权纠纷、肖像权纠纷案》[Zhao Yazi v Shanghai Qizi Trading Co Ltd & Shanghai Nuobaosi Cosmetics Co Ltd—Dispute over the Right of Infringement of the Right of Name and the Right of Portrait], 上海市浦东新区人民法院 [Pudong New District People’s Court of Shanghai Municipality, People’s Republic of China], 浦民一(民)初字第17767号 [Civil First Trial No 17767], 23 November 2012.Google Scholar

Cases B

  1. 《陈某某与复旦大学附属华东医院医疗损害责任纠纷案》[Chen v Huadong Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University—Medical Injury Compensation Dispute Case], 上海市第二中级人民法院 [Second Intermediate People’s Court of Shanghai Municipality, People’s Republic of China], 沪二中民一(民)终字第130号 [Civil Appeal No 130], 21 January 2013.Google Scholar
  2. 《上诉人陈维伦、张秀连与上诉人广州医学院第一附属医院医疗损害赔偿纠纷案》[Chen Weilun & Zhang Xiulian v First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University—Medical Injury Compensation Dispute Case], 广东省广州市中级人民法院 [Intermediate People’s Court of Guangzhou Municipality of Guangdong Province, People’s Republic of China], 穗中法民一终字第6020号 [Civil Appeal No 6020], 2010.Google Scholar
  3. 《刘某、张某某与复旦大学附属妇产科医院医疗损害责任纠纷案》[Liu & Zhang v Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University—Medical Injury Compensation Dispute Case], 上海市第二中级人民法院 [Second Intermediate People’s Court of Shanghai Municipality, People’s Republic of China], 沪二中民一(民)终字第2563号 [Civil Appeal No 2563], 23 April 2012.Google Scholar
  4. 《原告田某某、赵某某、张某某、张某与被告某某医院医疗损害赔偿纠纷案》[Tian & Zhao & Zhang XX & Zhang X v X Hospital—Medical Injury Compensation Dispute Case], 陕西省西安市灞桥区人民法院 [Baqiao District People’s Court of Xi’an Municipality of Shaanxi Province, People’s Republic of China], 灞民初字第00794号 [Civil First Trial No 000794], 3 July 2012.Google Scholar
  5. 《张秋霞、廖鄂华、廖郧华与佛山市中医院医疗损害赔偿纠纷案》[Zhang Qiuxia & Liao Ehua & Liao Yunhua v Foshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine—Medical Injury Compensation Dispute Case], 广东省佛山市中级人民法院 [Intermediate People’s Court of Foshan Municipality of Guangdong Province, People’s Republic of China], 佛中法民一终字第304号 [Civil Appeal No 304], 23 April 2008.Google Scholar

Statutes (People’s Republic of China)

  1. 《中华人民共和国公务员法》[Civil Servant Law of the People’s Republic of China]Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress, 27 April 2005 (see article 103).Google Scholar
  2. 《中华人民共和国著作权法》[Copyright Law of the People’s Republic of China] Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress, 26 February 2010 (see articles 47, 48).Google Scholar
  3. 《中华人民共和国刑法》[Criminal Law of the People’s Republic of China] National People’s Congress, 14 March 1997 (see article 37).Google Scholar
  4. 《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》[Criminal Procedure Law of the People’s Republic of China] National People’s Congress,14 March 2012 (see article 277).Google Scholar
  5. 《中华人民共和国民法通则》[General Principles of the Civil Law of the People’s Republic of China] National People’s Congress, 12 April 1986 (see article 134(1)).Google Scholar
  6. 《中华人民共和国行政监察法实施条例》[Implementing Regulation for the Administrative Supervision Law of the People’s Republic of China] State Council, 6 September 2004 (see article 22).Google Scholar
  7. 《中华人民共和国法官法》[Judges Law of the People’s Republic of China] Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress, 30 June 2001 (see article 47).Google Scholar
  8. 《中华人民共和国消费者权益保护法》[Law of the People’s Republic of China on the Protection of Consumer Rights and Interests] Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress, 25 October 2013 (see article 50).Google Scholar
  9. 《中华人民共和国海关行政赔偿办法》[Measures of the People’s Republic of China for Customs Administrative Compensation] General Administration of Customs, 24 March 2003 (see article 60).Google Scholar
  10. 《国家经贸委行政审批管理办法》[Measures of the State Economic and Trade Commission for the Administration of Administrative Examination and Approval] State Economic and Trade Commission, 8 January 2003 (see article 34).Google Scholar
  11. 《中华人民共和国检察官法》[Public Procurators Law of the People’s Republic of China] Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress, 30 June 2001 (see article 50).Google Scholar
  12. 《中华人民共和国治安管理处罚法》[Public Security Administration Punishments Law of the People’s Republic of China] Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress, 26 October 2012 (see article 117).Google Scholar
  13. 《计算机软件保护条例》[Regulation on Computers Software Protection] State Council, 16 January 2013 (see articles 23, 24).Google Scholar
  14. 《企事业单位内部治安保卫条例》[Regulation on Internal Security and Safeguard for Enterprises and Public Institutions] State Council, 13 September 2004 (see article 20).Google Scholar
  15. 《信息网络传播权保护条例》[Regulation on Protection of the Right to Network Dissemination of Information] State Council,30 January 2013 (see article 18).Google Scholar
  16. 《中华人民共和国电信条例》[Regulation on Telecommunications of the People’s Republic of China] State Council, 20 September 2000 (see articles 74, 75).Google Scholar
  17. 《事业单位人事管理条例》[Regulation on the Personnel Management of Public Institutions] State Council, 26 February 2014 (see article 42).Google Scholar
  18. 《中华人民共和国国家赔偿法》[State Compensation Law of the People’s Republic of China] Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress, 26 October 2012 (see article 35).Google Scholar
  19. 《中华人民共和国侵权责任法》[Tort Law of the People’s Republic of China] Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress, 26 December 2009 (see article 15(1)).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Journal of Bioethical Inquiry Pty Ltd. 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Deakin Law SchoolDeakin UniversityBurwoodAustralia

Personalised recommendations