Advertisement

Journal of Bioethical Inquiry

, Volume 12, Issue 3, pp 521–526 | Cite as

Paedophilia, Invasive Brain Surgery, and Punishment

  • Frederic GilbertEmail author
  • Andrej Vranič
Case Studies

Introduction

A possible relationship between brain tumours and acquired behavioural changes, including criminal conduct, has been and is still the focus of a multidisciplinary debate (Gilbert and Focquaert 2015). A significant number of clinical cases demonstrating behavioural changes and cognitive impairment due to brain lesions have been reported in the medical literature for many decades (Vidor 1951; Lishman 1968). A previous study we conducted on eighty-six patients suffering from brain lesions, revealing that 38 per cent developed disruptive personality and behavioural changes (including hypersexuality and aggressiveness), aligns with these clinical reports (Vranič and Gilbert 2014). However, even if a correlation between acquired behavioural changes and brain tumours seems to be a plausible medical hypothesis, its exact legal and ethical interpretation is not.

Acquired paedophilia and aggressiveness can be defined as occurring in individuals who have been free of these behaviours...

Keywords

Aggressiveness Cognitive impairment Cognitive capacities Consent Invasive brain surgery Paedophilia Punishment Tumour 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the JBI anonymous reviewers and editors for their insightful comments. Dr. Frederic Gilbert is the recipient of an Australian Research Council Discovery Early Career Researcher Award (project number DE150101390). Funding from the Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence Scheme (Project Number CE 140100012) is also gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. Adeberg, S., T. Bostel, L. König, T. Welzel, J. Debus, and S.E. Combs. 2014. A comparison of long-term survivors and short-term survivors with glioblastoma, subventricular zone involvement: A predictive factor for survival? Radiation Oncology 9: 95. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-9-95.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Berlin, F.S., and G.S. Coyle. 1981. Sexual deviation syndromes. The Johns Hopkins Medical Journal 149(3): 119–125.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Burns, J.M., and R.H. Swerdlow. 2003. Right orbitofrontal tumor with pedophilia symptom and constructional apraxia sign. Archives of Neurology 60(3): 437–440.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Devinsky, J., O. Sacks, and O. Devinsky. 2010. Kluver-Bucy syndrome, hypersexuality, and the law. Neurocase 16(2): 140–145.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Fairweather, D.S. 1947. Psychiatric aspects of the post-encephalitic syndrome. The Journal of Mental Science 93(391): 201–254.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Focquaert, F. 2014. Mandatory neurotechnological treatment: Ethical issues. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 35(1): 59–72.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Frohman, E.M., T.C. Frohman, and A.M. Moreault. 2002. Acquired sexual paraphilia in patients with multiple sclerosis. Archives of Neurology 59(6): 1006–1010.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Gilbert, F. 2009. Does neurobiological determinism entail the end of criminal responsibility? In Applied ethics: Life, environment and society, edited by the Center for Applied Ethics and Philosophy, 37–45. Japan: Hokkaido University.Google Scholar
  9. Gilbert, F., and F. Focquaert. 2015. Rethinking responsibility in offenders with acquired paedophilia: Punishment or treatment? International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 38(January–February):51–60. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2015.01.007.
  10. Gilbert, F., A. Vranič, and S. Hurst. 2013. Involuntary & voluntary invasive brain surgery: Ethical issues related to acquired aggressiveness. Neuroethics 6(1): 115–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Glannon, W. 2008. Moral responsibility and the psychopath. Neuroethics 1(3): 158–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hier, S.P. 2008. Thinking beyond moral panic: Risk, responsibility, and the politics of moralization. Theoretical Criminology 12(2): 173–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Joyal, C.C., N.D. Black, and B. Dassylva. 2007. The neuropsychology and neurology of sexual deviance: A review and pilot study. Sexual Abuse 19(2): 155–173.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Kane, R. 2002. The significance of free will. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Kurland, M. 1960. Pedophilia erotica. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 131(November): 394–403.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Lishman, W.A. 1968. Brain damage in relation to psychiatric disability after head injury. The British Journal of Psychiatry 114(509): 373–410.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Mendez, M.F., T. Chow, J. Ringman, G. Twitchell, and C.H. Hinkin. 2000. Pedophilia and temporal lobe disturbances. The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences 12(1): 71–76.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Miller, B.L., and J.L. Cummings. 1991. How brain injury can change sexual behavior. Medical Aspects of Human Sexuality 1: 54–62.Google Scholar
  19. Miller, B.L., J.L. Cummings, H. McIntyre, G. Ebers, and M. Grode. 1986. Hypersexuality or altered sexual preference following brain injury. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry 49(8): 867–873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Neuilly, M.A., and K. Zgoba. 2006. Assessing the possibility of a pedophilia panic and contagion effect between France and the United States. Victims & Offenders 1(3): 225–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ohgaki, H., and P. Kleihues. 2009. Genetic alterations and signaling pathways in the evolution of gliomas. Cancer Science 100(12): 2235–2241.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Regestein, Q.R., and P. Reich. 1978. Pedophilia occurring after onset of cognitive impairment. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 166(11): 794–798.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Tasmania Law Reform Institute. 2012. Sexual offences against young people: Issues paper no 17. http://www.utas.edu.au/law-reform/publications/completed-law-reform-projects. Accessed October 23, 2014.
  24. Van Inwagen, P. 1983. An essay on free will. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  25. Vidor, M. 1951. Personality changes following prefrontal leucotomy as reflected by the Minnesota multiphasic personality inventory and the results of psychometric testing. The British Journal of Psychiatry 97(406): 159–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Vranič, A., and F. Gilbert. 2014. Prognostic implication of preoperative behavior changes in patients with primary high-grade meningiomas. The Scientific World Journal 2014: 398295. doi: 10.1155/2014/398295.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Journal of Bioethical Inquiry Pty Ltd. 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ethics, Policy & Public Engagement (EPPE), ARC Centre of Excellence for Electromaterials Science (ACES), Faculty of ArtsUniversity of TasmaniaTasmaniaAustralia
  2. 2.Department of NeurosurgeryUniversity Medical Centre LjubljanaLjubljanaSlovenia

Personalised recommendations