Skip to main content

Making a Commitment to Ethics in Global Health Research Partnerships: A Practical Tool to Support Ethical Practice

Abstract

Global health research partnerships have many benefits, including the development of research capacity and improving the production and use of evidence to improve global health equity. These partnerships also include many challenges, with power and resource differences often leading to inequitable and unethical partnership dynamics. Responding to these challenges and to important gaps in partnership scholarship, the Canadian Coalition for Global Health Research (CCGHR) conducted a three-year, multi-regional consultation to capture the research partnership experiences of stakeholders in South Asia, Latin America, and sub-Saharan Africa. The consultation participants described persistent inequities in the conduct of global health research partnerships and called for a mechanism through which to improve accountability for ethical conduct within partnerships. They also called for a commitment by the global health research community to research partnership ethics. The Partnership Assessment Toolkit (PAT) is a practical tool that enables partners to openly discuss the ethics of their partnership and to put in place structures that create ethical accountability. Clear mechanisms such as the PAT are essential to guide ethical conduct to ensure that global health research partnerships are beneficial to all collaborators, that they reflect the values of the global health endeavor more broadly, and that they ultimately lead to improvements in health outcomes and health equity.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Notes

  1. 1.

    Partner organizations and hosts were: Dr. Koasar Afsana (project co-PI), BRAC, Bangladesh (2007); Dr. Jaime Breilh, Universided Andina “Simon Bolivar,” Ecuador (2008); and Dr. Abraham Assefa, Armauer Hansen Research Institute, Ethiopia (2009).

References

  1. Afsana, K., D. Habte, J. Hatfield, J. Murphy, and V. Neufeld. 2009. Partnership assessment toolkit. Canadian Coalition for Global Health Research and International Development Research Centre. www.ccghr.ca/resources/partnerships-and-networking/partnership-assessment-tool/. Accessed June 1, 2014.

  2. Association of Universities and Colleges of Canada. 2006. Highlighting the impacts of North–South research collaboration among Canadian and Southern higher education partners. Ottawa: Association of Universities and Colleges of Canada. www.aucc.ca/media-room/publications/highlighting-the-impacts-of-north-south-research-collaboration/. Accessed June 1, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Berry, N.S., J. Murphy, and L. Coser. 2014. Empowerment in the field of health promotion: Recognizing challenges in working toward equity. Global Health Promotion 21(4): 35–43. doi:10.1177/1757975914528725.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Boutilier, Z., I. Daibes, and E. de Ruggiero. 2011. Global health research case studies: Lessons from partnerships addressing health inequities. BMC International Health and Human Rights 11(Suppl 2): S2. doi:10.1186/1472-698X-11-S2-S2.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bradley, M. 2007. North–South research partnerships: Challenges, responses and trends—a literature review and annotated bibliography. Working paper 1, IDRC Canadian Partnerships working paper series. Ottawa: International Development Research Centre. http://idl-bnc.idrc.ca/dspace/bitstream/10625/36539/1/127716.pdf. Accessed June 1, 2014.

  6. Canadian Coalition for Global Health Research Mentorship Working Group. 2014. Stories of mentorship. www.ccghr.ca/working-groups/mentorship-working-group/stories-of-mentorship/. Accessed June 1, 2014.

  7. Costello, A., and A. Zumla. 2000. Moving to research partnerships in developing countries. British Medical Journal 321(7264): 827–829.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Forti, S. 2005. Building partnerships for research in global health—analytical framework. Ottawa: Canadian Coalition for Global Health Research. http://www.ccghr.ca/resources/partnerships-and-networking/effective-and-sustainable-partnerships/. Accessed June 2, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Graham, I.D., and J.M. Tetroe. 2009. Getting evidence into policy and practice: Perspective of a health research funder. Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 18(1): 46–50.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Katz, J.S., and B.R. Martin. 1997. What is research collaboration? Research Policy 26: 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Koplan, J.P., T.C. Bond, M.H. Merson, et al. 2009. Towards a common definition of global health. The Lancet 373(9679): 1993–1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kothari, A., and C.N. Wathen. 2013. A critical second look at integrated knowledge translation. Health Policy 109(2): 187–191.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Merson, M. 2014. University engagement in global health. The New England Journal of Medicine 370(18): 1676–1678.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Murphy, J., V.R. Neufeld, D. Habte, et al. 2013. Ethical consideration of global health partnerships. In An introduction to global health ethics, edited by A.D. Pinto and R.E.G. Upshur, 117–128. Routlege: London and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Netherlands Development Assistance Research Council. 2001. North–South research partnerships: Issues and challenges. The Hague: Trivandrum Expert Meeting Report. Publication no. 22.

  16. Oldham, G. 2005. International scientific collaboration: A quick guide. SciDev Net, January 4. www.scidev.net/global/policy-brief/international-scientific-collaboration-a-quick-gui.html. Accessed June 2, 2014.

  17. Ooms, G. 2011. Global health: What it has been so far, what it should be, and what it could become. In Working paper series of the studies in health services organisation and policy, edited by G. Kegels, V.D. Bouwere, and B. Criel, 1–68. Antwerp: Institute of Tropical Medicine, document no. 333172. http://www.itg.be/itg/Uploads/Volksgezondheid/wpshsop/SHSOP%20WP%202%20Ooms%20Global%20Health.pdf.

  18. Plamondon, K., J. Murphy, and E. Donald. 2014. Integrated knowledge translation for healthy communities. Paper presented at the Rural Health Services Research Conference, April 10–11, in Kelowna, B.C., Canada.

  19. Ridde, V., and F. Capelle. 2011. La recherche en santé mondialeet les défis des partenariats Nord–Sud. Canadian Journal of Public Health/Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique 102(2): 152–156.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Smith, R., H. Thorsteinsdóttir, A. Daar, E. Gold, and P. Singer. 2004. Genomics knowledge and equity: A global public goods perspective of the patent system. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 82(5): 385–389.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Swiss Commission for Research Partnership with Developing Countries. 1998. Guidelines for research partnership with developing countries. www.kfpe.ch/key_activities/publications/guidelines/guidelines_e.php. Accessed June 2, 2014.

  22. Swiss Commission for Research Partnership with Developing Countries. 2012. A guide for transboundary research partnerships. www.kfpe.ch/11-Principles/. Accessed June 2, 2014.

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jill Murphy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Murphy, J., Hatfield, J., Afsana, K. et al. Making a Commitment to Ethics in Global Health Research Partnerships: A Practical Tool to Support Ethical Practice. Bioethical Inquiry 12, 137–146 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-014-9604-6

Download citation

Keywords

  • Partnership
  • Research
  • Capacity development
  • Global health