The Legacy of the Cartwright Report: “Lest It Happen Again”

Abstract

The 1987 Cartwright Report into events at New Zealand’s National Women’s Hospital catalysed sweeping changes to promote and protect patients’ rights. A generation on, it is comfortable to believe that such sustained and deliberate violations of patient rights “couldn’t happen here” and “couldn’t happen now.” And yet, contemporary examples beg a different truth. Three of Cartwright’s messages hold an enduring relevance for health practitioners and patients: the need for patients to be respected as people; to be supported to make informed choices; and to have their voices heard, even when they whisper. These challenges cannot be met in isolation from broader determinants of patients’ rights and will require social, technological, and cultural change in order to prevent another “unfortunate experiment.”

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Berwick, D. 2013. A promise to learn—a commitment to act: Improving the safety of patients in England. London: Department of Health.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bismark, M., and E.A. Dauer. 2006. Motivations for medico-legal action: Lessons from New Zealand. The Journal of Legal Medicine 27(1): 55–70.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bismark, M.M., T.A. Brennan, R.J. Paterson, P.B. Davis, and D.M. Studdert. 2006. Relationship between complaints and quality of care in New Zealand: A descriptive analysis of complainants and non-complainants following adverse events. Quality and Safety in Health Care 15(1): 17–22.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bismark, M.M., A.J. Gogos, D. McCombe, R.B. Clark, R.L. Gruen, and D.M. Studdert. 2012. Legal disputes over informed consent for cosmetic procedures: A descriptive study of negligence claims and complaints in Australia. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery 65(11): 1506–1512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bismark, M.M., M.J. Spittal, L.C. Gurrin, M. Ward, and D.M. Studdert. 2013. Identification of doctors at risk of recurrent complaints: A national study of healthcare complaints in Australia. BMJ Quality & Safety 22(7): 532–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Burns, J.M., T.A. Davenport, H. Christensen, et al. 2013. Game on: Exploring the impact of technologies on young men’s mental health and wellbeing. Melbourne: Young and Well CRC.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Campbell, A., V.T. Chuan, and J. Chin. 2009. An international perspective. In The Cartwright papers: Essays on the cervical cancer inquiry 1987–88, ed. J. Manning, 182–195. Wellington: Bridget Williams Books.

  8. Cartwright, S. 1988. The report of the cervical cancer inquiry. Auckland: GPO.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Clinton, H.R. 1995. Women’s rights are human rights. Vital Speeches of the Day 61(24): 738.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Coney, S., and P. Bunkle. 1987. An “unfortunate experiment” at National Women’s. Metro, June, 47–65.

  11. Health and Disability Commissioner. 1996. The HDC code of health and disability services consumers’ rights regulation 1996. http://www.hdc.org.nz/the-act--code/the-code-of-rights/the-code-(full). Accessed May 2, 2014.

  12. Health and Disability Commissioner. 2013. Advanced Medical Institute (NZ) Ltd: A report by the Health and Disability Commissioner. Wellington: Health and Disability Commissioner.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jha, A. 2013. Improving patient safety through transparency. The New England Journal of Medicine 369(18): 1677–1679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mandel, M. 2013. Dr George Doodnaught’s victims describe their broken lives at sentencing. Toronto Sun, February 12. http://www.torontosun.com/2014/02/12/sentencing-hearing-for-dr-george-doodnaught. Accessed May 3, 2014.

  15. Matheson, C. 2009. A never ending story. In The Cartwright papers: Essays on the cervical cancer inquiry 1987–88, edited by J. Manning, 46–58. Wellington: Bridget Williams Books.

  16. McCredie, M.R.E., K.J. Sharples, C. Paul, et al. 2008. Natural history of cervical neoplasia and risk of invasive cancer in women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3: A retrospective cohort study. The Lancet Oncology 9(5): 425–434.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Paterson, R. 2002. The patients’ complaints system in New Zealand. Health Affairs 21(3): 70–79.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Paul, C. 2000. Internal and external morality of medicine: Lessons from New Zealand. BMJ: British 320(7233): 499.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Roy, A. 2004. Arundhati Roy—the 2004 Sydney Peace Prize lecture. The University of Sydney, November 4. http://sydney.edu.au/news/84.html?newsstoryid=279. Accessed May 3, 2014.

  20. Schenker, Y., A. Fernandez, R. Sudore, and D. Schillinger. 2011. Interventions to improve patient comprehension in informed consent for medical and surgical procedures: A systematic review. Medical Decision Making 31(1): 151–173.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

An earlier version of this paper was presented at “The Cartwright Legacy at 25 Years” held in Auckland on September 27, 2013. Our thanks to The Cartwright Collective for convening this conference and providing insightful suggestions for revisions.

Disclosure

Marie Bismark is a director of the Young and Well Cooperative Research Centre, which aims to better understand the influence of technology on young people’s health and well-being.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marie Bismark.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bismark, M., Morris, J. The Legacy of the Cartwright Report: “Lest It Happen Again”. Bioethical Inquiry 11, 425–429 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-014-9576-6

Download citation

Keywords

  • Cartwright Inquiry
  • Patients’ rights
  • Medical regulation
  • Informed choice