The issue of apologising to patients harmed by adverse events has been a subject of interest and debate within medicine, politics, and the law since the early 1980s. Although apology serves several important social roles, including recognising the victims of harm, providing an opportunity for redress, and repairing relationships, compelled apologies ring hollow and ultimately undermine these goals. Apologies that stem from external authorities’ edicts rather than an offender’s own self-criticism and moral reflection are inauthentic and contribute to a “moral flabbiness” that stunts the moral development of both individual providers and the medical profession. Following a discussion of a recent case from New Zealand in which a midwife was required to apologise not only to the parents but also to the baby, it is argued that rather than requiring health care providers to apologise, authorities should instead train, foster, and support the capacity of providers to apologise voluntarily.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Akoorie, N. 2014. Midwife told to apologise to mum. The New Zealand Herald, May 19. http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11257319. Accessed May 19, 2014.
Allan, A., and D. McKillop. 2010. The health implications of apologizing after an adverse event. International Journal for Quality in Health Care 22(2): 126–131.
Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care [ACSQHC]. 2012. Open disclosure standard review report. Sydney: ACSQHC.
Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care [ACSQHC]. 2013. Australian open disclosure framework. Sydney: ACSQHC.
Berlinger, N. 2003. Avoiding cheap grace. The Hastings Center Report 33(6): 28–36.
Bismark, M.M. 2009. The power of apology. The New Zealand Medical Journal 122(1304): 96–106.
Canadian Medical Protective Association. 2008. Communicating with your patient about harm: Disclosure of adverse events. Ottawa: Canadian Medical Protective Association.
Gallagher, T.H., A.D. Waterman, A.G. Ebers, V.J. Fraser, and W. Levinson. 2003. Patients’ and physicians’ attitudes regarding the disclosure of medical errors. The Journal of the American Medical Association 289(8): 1001–1007.
Gallagher, T., A.D. Waterman, J.M. Garbutt, et al. 2006. US and Canadian physicians’ attitudes and experiences regarding disclosing errors to patients. Archives of Internal Medicine 166(15): 1605–1611.
Hall, C. 2010. Ethics consultant is a master of apologies. The Dallas Morning News, June 12. http://www.dallasnews.com/business/columnists/cheryl-hall/20100612-Ethics-consultant-is-a-master-of-4304.ece. Accessed January 17, 2014.
Health and Disability Commissioner. 2008. Policy document—naming providers in public HDC reports. http://www.hdc.org.nz/media/18311/naming%20providers%20in%20public%20hdc%20reports.pdf. Accessed January 17, 2014.
Health and Disability Commissioner. 2009. Guidance on open disclosure policies. http://www.hdc.org.nz/media/18328/guidance%20on%20open%20disclosure%20policies%20dec%2009.pdf. Accessed April 16, 2014.
Health and Disability Commissioner. 2013a. Decision 11HDC00957. http://www.hdc.org.nz/decisions--case-notes/commissioner%27s-decisions/2013/11hdc00957. Accessed January 17, 2014.
Health and Disability Commissioner. 2013b. Commissioner’s decisions 2013. http://www.hdc.org.nz/decisions--case-notes/commissioner%27s-decisions/2013. Accessed January 17, 2014.
Helmreich, J.S. 2012. Does “sorry” incriminate? Evidence, harm and the protection of apology. Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy 21(3): 567–609.
Lazare, A. 2004. On apology. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
Massachusetts Coalition for the Prevention of Medical Errors. 2006. When things go wrong: Responding to adverse events. A consensus statement of the Harvard hospitals. Burlington: Massachusetts Coalition for the Prevention of Medical Errors.
McLennan, S.R., and R.D. Truog. 2013. Apology laws and open disclosure. Medical Journal of Australia 198(8): 411–412.
National Patient Safety Agency. 2009. Being open: Saying sorry when things go wrong. London: National Patient Safety Agency.
Simmons, J., and E. Nordenhaug. 2012. The outsourcing of ethical thinking. Paper presented at the Robert I. Strozier Faculty Lecture Series, October 12, in Savannah, Georgia, USA. http://www.armstrong.edu/About/events3/events_faculty_lecture_series-_the_outsourcing_of_ethical_thinking.
Taft, L. 2000. Apology subverted: The commodification of apology. The Yale Law Journal 109(5): 1135–1160.
Taft, L. 2005. Apology and medical mistake: Opportunity or foil? Annals of Health Law 14(1): 55–94.
Leigh E. Rich is the editor in chief of the Journal of Bioethical Inquiry but was not involved in the review or the acceptance of this manuscript.
About this article
Cite this article
McLennan, S., Walker, S. & Rich, L.E. Should Health Care Providers Be Forced to Apologise After Things Go Wrong?. Bioethical Inquiry 11, 431–435 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-014-9571-y
- Medical error
- Patient advocacy