Skip to main content

Ethics, Rhetoric, and Expectations: Responsibilities and Obligations of Health Care Systems

Abstract

Health care organization foundations and other fund-raising departments often function at an arm’s length from the system at large. As such, operations related to their mandate to raise funds and market the organization do not receive the same level of ethical scrutiny brought to bear on other arms within the organization. An area that could benefit from a more focused ethics lens is the use of language and rhetoric employed in order to raise funds and market the organization. Such departments and divisions often utilize overblown promises of miracles and extraordinary advances to convince donors to contribute and to persuade the general public. The result can be a heightened sense of expectation on the part of patients, their families, and the general public as to what can realistically be achieved by the health care system, leading to disappointment and conflict when these expectations are not or cannot be met. This article suggests that such advertising and marketing be subject to the same advertising standards as other businesses.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Notes

  1. 1.

    The Ontario Hospital Association’s conference was held in April 2012. See http://www.oha.com/Education/Conferences/ConferenceInformation/Pages/Default.aspx.

  2. 2.

    See the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act (1990) at http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/statutes/english/elaws_statutes_90f31_e.htm.

  3. 3.

    See the Health Care Consent Act (1996) at http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/statutes/english/elaws_statutes_96h02_e.htm.

References

  1. Advertising Standards Canada. 2012. The Canadian code of advertising standards. http://www.adstandards.com/en/standards/canCodeOfAdStandards.aspx.

  2. Beauchamp, T.L., and J.F. Childress. 1979. Principles of biomedical ethics. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Campbell, G. 1776. The philosophy of rhetoric. London: W. Strahan.

  4. Daniels, N. 2000. Accountability for reasonableness. BMJ 321(7272): 1300–1301. http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/321/7272/1300.

  5. Gawande, A. 2010. Letting go: What should medicine do when it can’t save your life? The New Yorker, August 2. http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2010/08/02/100802fa_fact_gawande.

  6. Locke, J. 2008. An essay concerning human understanding. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Foreman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Foreman, T. Ethics, Rhetoric, and Expectations: Responsibilities and Obligations of Health Care Systems. Bioethical Inquiry 11, 295–299 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-014-9551-2

Download citation

Keywords

  • Fund-raising
  • Rhetoric
  • Ethics
  • Health care systems