A Better Half: The Ethics of Hemicorporectomy Surgery

Abstract

This paper discusses the ethical issues related to hemicorporectomy surgery, a radical procedure that removes the lower half of the body in order to prolong life. The literature on hemicorporectomy (HC), also called translumbar amputation, has been nearly silent on the ethical considerations relevant to this rare procedure. We explore five aspects of the complex landscape of hemicorporectomy to illustrate the broader ethical questions related to this extraordinary procedure: benefits, risks, informed consent, resource allocation and justice, and loss and the lived body.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Notes

  1. 1.

    A pseudonym has been used to protect the patient’s identity.

References

  1. Behel, J.M., B. Rybarczyk, T.R. Elliott, J.J. Nicholas, and D. Nyenhuis. 2002. The role of perceived vulnerability in adjustment to lower body extremity amputation: A preliminary investigation. Rehabilitation Psychology 47(1): 92–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bhojak, M.M., and S.S. Nathawat. 1988. Body image, hopelessness, and personality dimensions in lower limb amputees. Indian Journal of Psychiatry 30(2): 161–165.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bono, C.M., N. Warholic, J.N. Katz, et al. 2012. Pain intensity and patients’ acceptance of surgical complication risks of spinal surgery. Spine 38(2): 140–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bridy, A. 2004. Confounding extremities: Surgery at the medico-ethical limits of self-modification. The Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 32(1): 148–158.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ferrara, B.E. 1990. Hemicorporectomy: A collective review. Journal of Surgical Oncology 45(4): 270–278.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Grondahl, P. 2011. Major surgery can’t end spark. Times Union, October 27, A1, A8–A9.

  7. Gunther, D.F. and D.S. Diekema. 2006. Attenuating growth in children with profound developmental disability: A new approach to an old dilemma. Archives of Pediatric & Adolescent Medicine 160(10): 1013–1017.

  8. Janis, A., J. Ahmad, J. Lemmon, C. Barnett, K. Morrill, and R. McClelland. 2009. A 25-year experience with hemicorporectomy for terminal pelvic osteomyelitis. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 124(4): 1165–1176.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lattig, F., T.F. Fekete, D. O’Riordan, et al. 2013. A comparison of patient and surgeon pre-operative expectations of spinal surgery. Spine 38(12): 1040–1048.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lemma, A. 2010. Under the skin: A psychoanalytic study of body modification. East Sussex, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Masterson, E.L. 2006. Hemicorporectomy: A humane option or a step too far? Irish Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Trauma 2: 31–33.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Merleau-Ponty, M. 2002. Phenomenology of perception. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Moore, C.E. 1968. The fantastic future. California Medicine 109(6): 495–498.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Muller, S. 2009. Body integrity identity disorder (BIID): Is the amputation of healthy limbs ethically justified? The American Journal of Bioethics 9(1): 36–43.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Porter-Romatowski, T.L., and J. Deckert. 1998. Hemicorporectomy: A case study from a physical therapy perspective. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 79(4): 464–468.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rybarczyk, B., D.L. Nyenhuis, J.J. Nichols, S.M. Cash, and J. Kaiser. 1995. Body image, perceived social stigma, and the prediction of psychosocial adjustment to leg amputation. Rehabilitation Psychology 40(2): 95–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Shields, R.K., and S. Dudley-Javoroski. 2003. Musculoskeletal deterioration and hemicorporectomy after spinal cord injury. Physical Therapy 83(3): 263–275.

  18. Weaver, J., and M. Flynn. 2000. Hemicorporectomy. Journal of Surgical Oncology 73(2): 117–124.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. White, R. 2000. Unforgettable patient: A tribute to Terry. Nursing 30(5): 57.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jane Jankowski or Lisa Campo-Engelstein.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jankowski, J., Campo-Engelstein, L. A Better Half: The Ethics of Hemicorporectomy Surgery. Bioethical Inquiry 11, 289–294 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-014-9542-3

Download citation

Keywords

  • Hemicorporectomy
  • Body modification
  • Risks and benefits
  • Informed consent
  • Resource allocation
  • Lived body