Normalising The Good Doctor … and Other Health Services Personnel

Commentary on Deborah Oyer’s Review of The Good Doctor

The Original Article was published on 08 October 2013

The topic of Ron Paterson’s book which was recently reviewed by Deborah Oyer only scratches the surface of a disturbing problem that is not confined to medicine, as health care delivery is a multidisciplinary experience for patients. I hear stories from patients about bullying dieticians, callous nurses, and institutions that espouse patient-centred care yet fail to deliver it to individuals who are unwell, worried, and vulnerable in an unfamiliar environment into which they have come for help. Maybe being conversant with standard guidelines and care pathways for specific health conditions makes it too easy forget that, for individual patients, ill health is a unique experience within their life-world. It could and should be our default approach as clinicians (and ancillary personnel) to acknowledge the fundamental competence that patients bring to health service encounters and to help them comprehend their options and the ramifications of their preferences within their life-world. Unless patients can explain to providers their life-world and its limitations and opportunities, gaps between advice-giving and advice-taking will remain and will influence health outcomes. Adjusting the system to ensure providers have enough time to listen more to their patients—and the will to do so—could be a useful starting point, as others (Barry et al. 2001) have suggested. The challenge, as Paterson’s analysis of the situation implies, is to reach that point with consistency in each patient encounter. This will require personal as well as structural commitment.

References

  1. Barry, C.A., F.A. Stevenson, N. Britten, N. Barber, and C.P. Bradley. 2001. Giving voice to the lifeworld. More humane, more effective medical care? A qualitative study of doctor–patient communication in general practice. Social Science and Medicine 53(4): 487–505.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Oyer, D. 2013. Review of The good doctor: What patients want, by Ron Paterson. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 10(4): 519–521. doi:10.1007/s11673-013-9485-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Paterson, R. 2012. The good doctor: what patients want. Auckland: Auckland University Press.

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Letitia Helen Burridge.

Additional information

The original article by Deborah Oyer, published in the Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 10(4): 519–521, can be located at DOI 10.1007/s11673-013-9485-0.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Burridge, L.H. Normalising The Good Doctor … and Other Health Services Personnel. Bioethical Inquiry 11, 113 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-014-9514-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • Health Care Delivery
  • Care Pathway
  • Standard Guideline
  • Patient Encounter
  • Unique Experience