Journal of Bioethical Inquiry

, Volume 10, Issue 4, pp 533–537 | Cite as

Multiple Criteria and Trade-Offs in Environmental Ethics

Comment on “Ethics of Species Research and Preservation” by Rob Irvine
Case Studies


Animal welfare Biodiversity Multi-criteria analysis Objectives hierarchy Trade-offs Values 


  1. Arrow, K.J., and H. Raynaud. 1986. Social choice and multicriterion decision-making. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  2. Callicott, J.B. 1980. Animal liberation: A triangular affair. Environmental Ethics 2(4): 311–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Callicott, J.B., L.B. Crowder, and K. Mumford. 1999. Current normative concepts in conservation. Conservation Biology 13(1): 22–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Figuera, J., S. Greco, and M. Ehrgott, eds. 2005. Multiple criteria decision analysis: State of the art surveys. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  5. Guha, R. 1989. Radical American environmentalism and wilderness preservation: A third world critique. Environmental Ethics 11(1): 71–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Higgs, E. 2003. Nature by design: People, natural process, and ecological restoration. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  7. Irvine, R. 2013. Ethics of species research and preservation. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 10(2): 261–262.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jeffrey, R.C. 1974. Preference among preferences. Journal of Philosophy 71(13): 377–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Keeney, R.L. 1992. Value-focused thinking: A path to creative decisionmaking. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Keeney, R.L., and H. Raiffa. 1993. Decisions with multiple objectives: Preferences and value tradeoffs, 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Margules, C.R., and S. Sarkar. 2007. Systematic conservation planning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. McShane, K. 2007. Why environmental ethicists shouldn’t give up on intrinsic value. Environmental Ethics 29(1): 43–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Moffett, A., and S. Sarkar. 2006. Incorporating multiple criteria into the design of conservation area networks: A minireview with recommendations. Diversity and Distributions 12(2): 125–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Norton, B.G. 1987. Why preserve natural variety? Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Resnik, M.D. 1987. Choices: An introduction to decision theory. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  16. Sarkar, S. 1999. Wilderness preservation and biodiversity conservation—keeping divergent goals distinct. BioScience 49(5): 405–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Sarkar, S. 2005. Biodiversity and environmental philosophy: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sarkar, S. 2011. Habitat reconstruction: Moving beyond historical fidelity. In The handbook of the philosophy of science, volume 11: Philosophy of ecology, ed. K. deLaplante, B. Brown, and K.A. Peacock, 327–361. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  19. Sarkar, S. 2012. Environmental philosophy: From theory to practice. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell Press.Google Scholar
  20. Sarkar, S., R.L. Pressey, D.P. Faith, et al. 2006. Biodiversity conservation planning tools: Present status and challenges for the future. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 31: 123–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sober, E.R. 1986. Philosophical problems for environmentalism. In The preservation of species: The value of biological diversity, ed. B.G. Norton, 173–194. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  22. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1991. Black-capped vireo (Vireo atricapilla) recovery plan. Albuquerque: United States Fish and Wildlife Service.Google Scholar
  23. Vane-Wright, R.I., C.J. Humphries, and P.H. Williams. 1991. What to protect? Systematics and the agony of choice. Biological Conservation 55(3): 235–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. von Winterfeldt, D., and Edwards, W., 2007. Defining a decision analytic structure. In: Edwards, W., Miles Jr., R. F., von Winterfeldt, D. (Eds.), Advances in Decision Theory: From Foundations to Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 81–103.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Philosophy and Section of Integrative BiologyUniversity of TexasAustinUSA

Personalised recommendations