Skip to main content

In Defence of the Vegan Project

Abstract

The vegan project is defined as the project that strives for radical legal reform to pass laws that would reserve the consumption of animal products to a very narrow range of situations, resulting in vegan diets being the default diets for the majority of human beings. Two objections that have been raised against such a project are described. The first is that such a project would jeopardise the nutritional adequacy of human diets. The second is that it would alienate human beings from nature. It is argued that neither undermines the vegan project.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Akhtar, A. 2012. Animals and public health. Why treating animals better is critical to human welfare. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. American Dietetic Association. 2009. Position of the American Dietetic Association: Vegetarian diets. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 109(7): 1266–1282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Atkinson, S., A. Velarde, P. Llonch, and B. Algers. 2012. Assessing pig welfare at stunning in Swedish commercial abattoirs using CO2 group-stun methods. Animal Welfare 21(4): 487–495.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Barnard, N.D., A. Nicholson, and J.L. Howard. 1995. The medical costs attributable to meat consumption. Preventive Medicine 24(6): 646–655.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bergqvist, J., and S. Gunnarson. 2013. Finfish aquaculture: Animal welfare, the environment, and ethical implications. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 26(1): 75–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Crawford, M., Y. Wang, C. Lehane, and K. Ghebremeskel. 2010. Fatty-acid ratios in free-living and domestic animals. In Modern dietary fat intakes in disease promotion, ed. F. De Meester, S. Zibadi, and R. Watson, 95–108. New York: Humana Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Deckers, J. 2009. Vegetarianism, sentimental or ethical? Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 22(6): 573–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Deckers, J. 2010a. What policy should be adopted to curtail the negative global health impacts associated with the consumption of farmed animal products? Res Publica: A Journal of Moral, Legal and Social Philosophy 16(1): 57–72.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Deckers, J. 2010b. Should the consumption of farmed animal products be restricted, and if so, by how much? Food Policy 35(6): 497–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Deckers, J. 2011a. Should Whiteheadians be vegetarians? A critical analysis of the thoughts of Whitehead, Birch, Cobb, and McDaniel. Journal of Animal Ethics 1(1): 80–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Deckers, J. 2011b. Should Whiteheadians be vegetarians? A critical analysis of the thoughts of Hartshorne and Dombrowski. Journal of Animal Ethics 1(2): 195–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Deckers, J. 2011c. Negative “GHIs”, the right to health protection, and future generations. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 8(2): 165–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Deckers, J. 2011d. Justice, negative GHIs, and the consumption of farmed animal products. Journal of Global Ethics 7(2): 205–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Deckers, J. 2011e. Could some people be wronged by contracting swine flu? A case discussion on the links between the farm animal sector and human disease. Journal of Medical Ethics 37(6): 354–356.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Deckers, J. 2011f. Does the consumption of farmed animal products cause human hunger? Journal of Hunger and Environmental Nutrition 6(3): 353–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Devendra, C. 2007. Small farm systems to feed hungry Asia. Outlook on Agriculture 36(1): 7–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Fairlie, S. 2010. Meat: A benign extravagance. East Meon: Permanent Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hallberg, L. 1998. Does calcium interfere with iron absorption? The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 68(1): 3–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Keyzer, M., M. Merbis, I. Pavel, and C. van Wesenbeeck. 2005. Diet shifts towards meat and the effects on cereal use: Can we feed the animals in 2030? Ecological Economics 55(2): 187–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lanou, A. 2009. Should dairy be recommended as part of a healthy vegetarian diet? Counterpoint. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 89(5): 1638S–1642S.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Lanou, A., and M. Castleman. 2009. Building bone vitality: A revolutionary plan to prevent bone loss and reverse osteoporosis. Columbus: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Marsh, K., K. Zeuschner, and A. Saunders. 2012. Health implications of a vegetarian diet: A review. American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine 6(3): 250–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Shields, S., S. Park, and A. Mohan Raj. 2010. A critical review of electrical water-bath stun systems for poultry slaughter and recent developments in alternative technologies. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 13(4): 281–299.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. World Wildlife Fund (WWF). 2011. Soya and the Cerrado: Brazil’s forgotten jewel. Godalming: World Wildlife Fund.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank the reviewers of this article and participants in the Newcastle Animal Ethics and Sustainable Food Policy conference (December 2, 2011) for their comments on an earlier version. I am grateful to Beacon North East for funding this conference, where an earlier version of this article was presented.

Statement of Competing Interests

The author is an Associate Editor of the Journal of Bioethical Inquiry but was not involved with the review of this article.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan Deckers.

Additional information

This article is an expanded version of a paper presented at the Newcastle Animal Ethics and Sustainable Food Policy conference (held at Newcastle University on December 2, 2011), which addressed the following question: “How should the U.K. Government regulate the consumption of animal products?” Presentations of the conference were recorded and can be downloaded, together with their PowerPoint slides, from http://backdoorbroadcasting.net/2011/12/animal-ethics-and-sustainable-food-policy-a-minding-animals-international/

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Deckers, J. In Defence of the Vegan Project. Bioethical Inquiry 10, 187–195 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-013-9428-9

Download citation

Keywords

  • Animal ethics
  • Animal law
  • Global health
  • Veganism