Journal of Bioethical Inquiry

, Volume 9, Issue 2, pp 213–214 | Cite as

Edo—Kingyo’s Coolness and the Night Aquarium Museum Lounge

Hidetomo Kimura, 2011, Nihonbashi Mitsui Hall (Tokyo, August 12–September 12, art aquarium exhibition)
  • Katrina A. Bramstedt
Art Review

As with circuses, aquariums have been the subject of concern for animal welfare experts (Tilikum, Katina, Corky, Kasatka, and Ulises v. SeaWorld2011): Is captivity the best place for these animals? Are these settings merely entertainment venues? If they provide an educational experience for viewers, does the learning experience outweigh the risks to the animals? Could the education be gained by other modes? What are the elements of animal welfare in the setting of an aquarium? After viewing the Edo—Kingyo’s Coolness Tokyo art exhibit online using the creator’s YouTube video (Kimura 2011), the importance of all of these questions becomes apparent.

Hidetomo Kimura is the designer of the Coolness exhibit. It is just one of several “art aquariums” he has created over the years. The Coolnessexhibit is a hybrid blend of art show, goldfish aquarium, and night club. Envision a museum wing converted into a dance club, complete with disc jockey, live band, overpowering techno music,...


Animal welfare Art Music Stimuli Light Aquarium Entertainment Animal ethics Media and communication 



I thank Ami Takisawa and Jim Ediger for their translations of the video’s audio from Japanese to English.


No funding to disclose. I am an Associate Editor for the Journal of Bioethical Inquiry.


  1. American Veterinary Medical Association. 2007. AVMA policy: Animals used in entertainment, shows, and for exhibition. Accessed October 11, 2011.
  2. Barber, J.C.E., and J. Mellen. 2008. Assessing animal welfare in zoos and aquaria: Is it possible? In The well-being of animals in zoos and aquarium-sponsored research: Putting best practices forward, ed. T. Bettinger and J. Bielitzki, 39–52. Green Belt, MD: Scientists Center for Animal Welfare.Google Scholar
  3. Barber, J.C.E. 2009. Programmatic approaches to assessing and improving animal welfare in zoos and aquariums. Zoo Biology 28(6): 519–530.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Ellyatt, M. 2005. Ocean gladiator: Battles beneath the ocean. Edgware, UK: Emily Eight Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
  5. Kimura, H. 2011. ナイトアクアリウムミュージアムラウンジ [Night Aquarium Museum Lounge]. Accessed October 11, 2011.
  6. Ollivier, F.J., D.A. Samuelson, D.E. Brooks, P.A. Lewis, M.E. Kallberg, and A.M. Komáromy. 2004. Comparative morphology of the tapetum lucidum (among selected species). Veterinary Ophthalmology 7(1): 11–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Tilikum, Katina, Corky, Kasatka, and Ulises, five orcas; People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc, v. SeaWorld Parks & Entertainment, Inc. and SeaWorld, LLC. 2011. United States District Court for the Southern District of California. Case Number 11-cv-02476-JM-WMC, 26 October.Google Scholar
  8. Warrant, E., and N.A. Locket. 2004. Vision in the deep sea. Biological Reviews 79(3): 671–712.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Bond University School of MedicineUniversity DriveGold CoastAustralia

Personalised recommendations