Skip to main content
Log in

Toward a Sociology of Conflict of Interest in Medical Research

  • Case Studies
  • Published:
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.


  • Boyd, E.A., and L.A. Bero. 2007. Defining financial conflicts and managing research relationships: An analysis of university conflict of interest committee decisions. Science and Engineering Ethics 13(4): 415–435.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cassell, G.H. 2007. Interactions of the public and private sectors in drug development: Boundaries to protect scientific values while preserving innovation. Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine 74(2): S45–S48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, R.A. 2007. The pharmaceutical industry at risk: How excessive government regulation stifles innovation. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 82(2): 131–132.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ilakovac, V., K. Fister, M. Marusic, and A. Marusic. 2007. Reliability of disclosure forms of authors’ contributions. CMAJ 176(1): 41–46.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lo, B., and M.J. Field, eds. 2009. Conflict of interest in medical research, education, and practice. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press. Accessed October 5, 2009.

  • Lupton, D. 1999. Risk. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, S., and G. Barrett. 2006. Research governance: Regulating risk and reducing harm? Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 99(1): 14–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarah Winch.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Winch, S., Sinnott, M. Toward a Sociology of Conflict of Interest in Medical Research. Bioethical Inquiry 8, 389–391 (2011).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: