Journal of Bioethical Inquiry

, Volume 8, Issue 2, pp 121–122 | Cite as

No Chance, No Value, or No Way: Reassessing the Place of Futility in Health Care and Bioethics

  • Sarah Winch
  • Ian KerridgeEmail author

Throughout its history, and particularly in the modern age, medicine has fought to conquer disease and to “tame” death. There have been remarkable successes. Yet clearly there are limits to the reach of medicine that are influenced by context and time. In other words, there are points beyond which medicine should not go—either because it will not be effective in achieving its goals (however these are defined) or because it will cause more harm than benefit. While there is general agreement that medicine is, and should be, limited—there is little consensus on how this point can be defined, who has the authority to define it, what the implications are of such judgements, and what processes should be enacted both to guide decision-making and to resolve contest around the ends and goals of medicine

Three decades of debate on medical futility have provided little clarity and have produced a plethora of definitions, procedures, and conceptual models, with futility being both hailed as the...


Medical Professionalism Ethical Judgement Conscious State Power Imbalance Moral Concern 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Halevy, A., and B.A. Brody. 1996. A multi-institution collaborative policy on medical futility. Journal of the American Medical Association 276(7): 571–574.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Helft, P.R., M. Siegler, and J. Lantos. 2000. The rise and fall of the futility movement. The New England Journal of Medicine 343(4): 293–296.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Schneiderman, L.J., and N. Jecker. 1993. Futility in practice. Archives of Internal Medicine 153(4): 437–441.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Truog, R.D. 2010. Is it always wrong to perform futile CPR? The New England Journal of Medicine 362(6): 477–479.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of MedicineThe University of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia
  2. 2.Centre for Values, Ethics and the Law in MedicineUniversity of SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations