“This is Why you’ve Been Suffering”: Reflections of Providers on Neuroimaging in Mental Health Care
- 301 Downloads
Mental health care providers increasingly confront challenges posed by the introduction of new neurotechnology into the clinic, but little is known about the impact of such capabilities on practice patterns and relationships with patients. To address this important gap, we sought providers’ perspectives on the potential clinical translation of functional neuroimaging for prediction and diagnosis of mental illness. We conducted 32 semi-structured telephone interviews with mental health care providers representing psychiatry, psychology, family medicine, and allied mental health. Our results suggest that mental health providers have begun to re-conceptualize mental illness with a neuroscience gaze. They report an epistemic commitment to the value of a brain scan to provide a meaningful explanation of mental illness for their clients. If functional neuroimaging continues along its projected trajectory to translation, providers will ultimately have to negotiate its role in mental health. Their perspectives, therefore, enrich bioethical discourse surrounding neurotechnology and inform the translational pathway.
KeywordsNeuroethics Mental health Psychiatry Neuroimaging
Supported by NIH/NIMH 9RO1MH84282, the Canadian Institutes for Health Research, Institutes for Neuroscience, Mental Health and Addiction (CIHR-INMHA) CNE #85117, the British Columbia Knowledge Development Fund (BCKDF), the Canadian Foundation for Innovation (CFI), and the Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute. Special thanks to Dr. Allan H. Young and members of the Institute of Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, and to the anonymous reviewer for thoughtful remarks.
- Bennett, M.R., and P.M.S. Hacker. 2003. Philosophical foundations of neuroscience. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Bloch, S., P. Chodoff, and S.A. Green. 1999. Psychiatric ethics, 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Buchman, D.Z., and J. Illes. 2010. Imaging genetics for our neurogenetic future. Minnesota Journal of Law, Science, & Technology 11(1): 79–97.Google Scholar
- Dumit, J. 2000. When explanations rest: “Good Enough” brain science and the new socio-medical disorders. In: M. Lock, A. Young and A. Cambrosio (Eds.). In Living and working with the new medical technologies: Intersections of inquiry, 209–232. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Edwards, J., P. Harvey, and P. Wade. 2010. Technologized images, technologized bodies. In Technologized images, technologized bodies, ed. J. Edwards, P. Harvey, and P. Wade, 1–36. New York: Berghahn.Google Scholar
- Farmer, R.L. 2008. Neuroscience and social work practice: the missing link. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
- Foucault, M. 1963/2010. The birth of the clinic: an archeology of medical perception. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Gillett, G. 2010. The multiaxial, multi-layered reality that is mental disorder. Bulletin of the Association for the Advancement of Philosophy and Psychiatry 17(1): http://alien.dowling.edu/%7Ecperring/aapp/BulletinVol17No1.pdf.
- Giovanni, F., and S. Anker. 2009. Neuroculture. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 10: 815–821.Google Scholar
- Glannon, W. 2007. Bioethics and the brain. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Guze, S.B. 1992. Why psychiatry is a branch of medicine. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Hacking, I. 2004. Historical ontology, 99–114. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Klitzman, R. 2006. Clinicians, patients, and the brain. In Neuroethics: defining the issues in theory, practice, and policy, ed. J. Illes, 229–241. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Merton, R.K. 1976. Sociological ambivalence and other essays. New York: Free.Google Scholar
- Murphy, E.R., and J. Illes. 2007. Neuroethics and psychiatry: new collaborations for emerging challenges. Psychiatric Annals 37(12): 398–804.Google Scholar
- Pescosolido, B.A., J.K. Martin, J.S. Long, T.R. Medina, J.C. Phelan, and B.G. Link. 2010. “A disease like any other”? A decade of change in public reactions to schizophrenia, depression, and alcohol dependence. American Journal of Psychiatry. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.09121743.
- Phelan, J.C., R. Cruz-Rojas, and M. Reiff. 2002. Genes and stigma: the connection between perceived genetic etiology and attitudes and beliefs about mental illness. American Journal of Psychiatric Rehabilitation 6(2): 159–185.Google Scholar
- Reiner, P.B. 2011. The rise of neuroessentialsim. In The Oxford handbook of neuroethics, ed. J. Illes and B. Sahakian. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Rose, N. 2003. The neurochemical self and its anomalies. In Risk and morality, ed. R. Ericson and A. Doyle, 407–437. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
- Rose, N. 2007. The politics of life itself: biomedicine, power and subjectivity in the twenty-first century. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Schleim, S., and J. P. Roiser. 2009. fMRI in translation: The challenges facing real-world applications. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 3: doi:10.3389/neuro.09.063.2009.
- The International Schizophrenia Consortium. 2009. Common polygenic variation contributes to risk of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Nature 460: 748–752.Google Scholar
- Valenstein, E.S. 1986. Great and desperate cures: the rise and decline of pyschosurgery and other radical treatments for mental illness. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Wittgenstein, L. 1953. Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. Trans. G. E. M. Anscombe.Google Scholar
- Young, A. 1995. The harmony of illusions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar