Journal of Bioethical Inquiry

, Volume 6, Issue 3, pp 307–324 | Cite as

The Traditional Account of Ethics and Law at the End of Life—and its Discontents

  • Roger S. MagnussonEmail author


For the past 30 years, the Melbourne urologist Dr Rodney Syme has quietly—and more recently, not-so-quietly—assisted terminally and permanently ill people to die. This paper draws on Syme’s recent book, A Good Death: An Argument for Voluntary Euthanasia, to identify and to reflect on some important challenges to what I outline as the traditional account of law, ethics, and end of life decisions. Among the challenges Syme makes to the traditional view is his argument that physicians’ intentions are frail and unfairly expose physicians to moral and legal censure. Secondly, Syme argues that physician-assisted dying (PAD) should be framed as a form of palliative care, not as a kind of safety-chute for when palliative care fails. Thirdly, Syme himself is a rare breed: a dissident doctor who has opened himself up for scrutiny and criticism, by reflecting publicly on his experiences at the edge of the law. Syme’s career illustrates that prohibition, just like legalization, is a social policy that carries social consequences. The paper acknowledges the variability and idiosyncratic nature of extra-legal physician-assisted dying, and argues that the best way forward is to attempt to weigh the social consequences of both policies. Advocates and opponents of PAD should recognize that both prohibition and legalization involve trade-offs and impose possible costs on patients and on society.


Euthanasia Physician-assisted suicide Palliative sedation Criminal law Personal autonomy Withdrawing treatment Law and ethics 



The author would like to thank the reviewers for their helpful comments.


  1. Abernethy, A., D. Currow, B. Fazekas, M. Luszcz, J.L. Wheeler, and M. Kuchibhatla. 2007. Specialized palliative care services are associated with improved short- and long-term caregiver outcomes. Support Care Cancer 16: 585–597.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Airedale NHS Trust v Bland (1993) AC 789–899.Google Scholar
  3. Alcorn, G. 1998. Right to die row returns. Age. 2 November, p 1.Google Scholar
  4. Ashby, M. 2001. On causing death. Medical Journal of Australia 175: 517–518.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Ashby, M.A. and D. Mendelson. 2004. Gardner; re BWV: Victorian Supreme Court makes landmark Australian ruling on tube feeding. Medical Journal of Australia 181: 442–445.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Assisted Dying for the Terminally Ill Bill. 2004. (House of Lords) (HL Bill 17).Google Scholar
  7. Battin, M., A. van der Heide, L. Ganzini, G. van der Wal, and B. Onwuteaka-Philipsen. 2007. Legal physician-assisted dying in Oregon and the Netherlands: evidence concerning the impact on patients in “vulnerable” groups. Journal of Medical Ethics 33: 591–597.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Beauchamp, T. and F. James. 1994. Principles of biomedical ethics, 4th ed. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bernheim, J., R. Deschepper, W. Distelmans, A. Mullie, J. Bilsen, and L. Deliens. 2008. Development of palliative care and legalization of euthanasia: Antagonism or synergy? British Medical Journal 336: 864–867.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bishop, J. 2006. Framing euthanasia. Journal of Medical Ethics 32: 225–228.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bosshard, G., B. Broeckaert, D. Clark, L.J. Materstvedt, B. Gordijn, and H.C. Müller-Busch. 2008. A role for doctors in assisted dying? An analysis of legal regulations and medical professional positions in six European countries. Journal of Medical Ethics 34: 28–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Burt, R.A. 1997. The Supreme Court speaks. New England Journal of Medicine 337: 1234–1236.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Butcher, S. and L. Pryor. 2003. Justice tempered with mercy for husband who helped his wife die. Sydney Morning Herald. 25 July 2003.Google Scholar
  14. Campbell, S. 2008. Ten years of “death with dignity”. The New Atlantis 22: 33–46.Google Scholar
  15. Cantor, N. 2004. On Kamisar, killing, and the future of physician-assisted death. Michigan Law Review 102: 1401–1449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Caplan, A., L. Snyder, and K. Faber-Langendoen. 2000. The role of guidelines in the practice of physician-assisted suicide. Annals of Internal Medicine 132: 476–481.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Chabot, B. and A. Goedhart. 2009. A survey of self-directed dying attended by proxies in the Dutch population. Social Science & Medicine 68: 1745–1751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chapple, A., S. Ziebland, A. McPherson, and A. Herzheimer. 2006. What people close to death say about euthanasia and assisted suicide: A qualitative study. Journal of Medical Ethics 32: 706–710.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Consent to Medical Treatment and Palliative Care Act. 1995. (SA) s. 17.Google Scholar
  20. Cook, D., G. Guyatt, R. Jaeschke, J. Reeve, A. Spanier, D. King, et al. 1995. Determinants in Canadian health care workers of the decision to withdraw life support from the critically ill. JAMA 273: 703–708.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cox. 1992. 12 BMLR 38.Google Scholar
  22. Crimes Act. 1900. (NSW) s 18 (defining murder and manslaughter).Google Scholar
  23. Criminal Code Amendment Suicide Related Material Offences Act. 2005.Google Scholar
  24. Cruzan v Director, Missouri Department of Health 497 US 261. 1990.Google Scholar
  25. Currow, D. 2002. MEDicine or MADness. Medical Journal of Australia 176: 190–191.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Currow, D., A. Ward, J. Plummer, E. Bruera, and A. Abernethy. 2008. Comfort in the last 2 weeks of life: relationship to accessing palliative care services. Support Care Cancer 16: 1255–1263.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Davies, N. 1995. Helping patients to die. Age. 25 March, p 1.Google Scholar
  28. Davies, J. 2007. Terminal answer. Bulletin. 6 November, pp 28–31.Google Scholar
  29. Davies, J. 2009. Suicide drug of choice in mail; death drug ordered by internet, sourced by friends in underground trade. Weekend Australian. 14–15 March 2009, pp 1, 4.Google Scholar
  30. De Beer, T., C. Gastmans, and B. Dierckx de Casterlé. 2004. Involvement of nurses in euthanasia: A review of the literature. Journal of Medical Ethics 30: 494–498.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Douglas, C., I. Kerridge, K. Rainbird, J. McPhee, L. Hancock, and A. Spigelman. 2001. The intention to hasten death: A survey of attitudes and practices of surgeons in Australia. Medical Journal of Australia 175: 511–515.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Dyer, C. 2006. UK House of Lords rejects physician assisted suicide. British Medical Journal 332: 1169.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Dyer, C. 2009. Peers consider plan to amend UK law over assisted suicide abroad. British Medical Journal 338: b2081.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Emanuel, E. 2002. Euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide: A review of the empirical data from the United States. Archives of Internal Medicine 162: 142–152.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Fitzgerald, J. 1999. Bioethics, disability and death: Uncovering cultural bias in the euthanasia debate. In Disability, divers-ability and legal change, ed. M. Jones and L. Marks, 267–281. The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  36. Gardner; re BWV. 2003. VSC 173 (29 May 2003).Google Scholar
  37. George, K. 2007. A woman’s choice? The gendered risks of voluntary euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide. Medical Law Review 15: 1–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Gonzales v Oregon. 2006. 126 S. Ct. 904; 546 U.S. 243.Google Scholar
  39. Gostin, L.O. 2006. Physician-assisted suicide. A legitimate medical practice? Journal of the American Medical Association 295: 1941–1943.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Gunderman, R. 2002. Is suffering the enemy? Hastings Center Report March-April: 40–44.Google Scholar
  41. Hall, F., F. Trachtenberg, and E. Dugan. 2005. The impact on patient trust of legalizing physician aid in dying. Journal of Medical Ethics 31: 693–697.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Herranz, G. 2004. Euthanasia: An uncontrollable power over death. (Translated from the Spanish by Lilia Ceballos; published in Spanish as La Metamorfosis del Activismo Pro-eutanasia. Persona y Bioética 8: 16–21. English-language version published 2006. The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 6: 263–270. Available at: (accessed 27 February 2009).
  43. House of Lords, Select Committee on the Assisted Dying for the Terminally Ill Bill. Final Report. 2005. (HL Paper 86–1, 4 April, at: (accessed 12 March 2009).
  44. Hudson, P., L. Kristjanson, M. Ashby, B. Kelly, P. Schofield, R. Hudson, et al. 2006. Desire for hastened death in patients with advanced disease and the evidence base of clinical guidelines: A systematic review. Palliative Medicine 20: 693–701.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hurst, S.A. and A. Mauron. 2003. Assisted suicide and euthanasia in Switzerland: Allowing a role for non-physicians. British Medical Journal 326: 271–273.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Hutchings, B. 1997. Andrews won’t stop me, doctor vows. Australian. 26 March, p 2.Google Scholar
  47. Huxtable, R. 2004. Get out of jail free? The doctrine of double effect in English law. Palliative Medicine 18: 62–68.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kade, W. 2000. Death with dignity: A case study. Annals of Internal Medicine 132: 504–506.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Kaldjian, L.C., J.F. Jekel, J.L. Bernene, G.E. Rosenthal, M. Vaughan-Sarrazin, and T.P. Duffy. 2004. Internists’ attitudes towards terminal sedation in end of life care. Journal of Medical Ethics 30: 499–503.Google Scholar
  50. Keizer, B. 1997. In search of a decent death. Guardian Weekly. 13 April 1997: 24.Google Scholar
  51. Kelly, B., P. Burnett, D. Pelusi, S. Badger, F. Varghese, and M. Robertson. 2004. Association between clinician factors and a patient’s wish to hasten death: Terminally ill cancer patients and their doctors. Psychosomatics 45: 311–318.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Keown, J. 2002. The case of Ms B: Suicide’s slippery slope. Journal of Medical Ethics 28: 238.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Kuhse, H., P. Singer, B. Clark, and M. Rickard. 1997. End-of-life decisions in Australian medical practice. Medical Journal of Australia 166: 191–196.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. LaFrance, A.B. 2008. Physician assisted death: From rhetoric to reality in Oregon. Wyoming Law Review 8: 333–346.Google Scholar
  55. Lewis, P. 2007. The empirical slippery slope from voluntary to non-voluntary euthanasia. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 35: 197–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Little, M. 1999. Assisted suicide, suffering and the meaning of a life. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 20: 287–298.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Lo, B. and G. Rubenfeld. 2005. Palliative sedation in dying patients: “We turn to it when everything else hasn’t worked”. Journal of the American Medical Association 294: 1810–1816.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Lowey, E. 2001. Terminal sedation, self-starvation, and orchestrating the end of life. Archives of Internal Medicine 161: 329–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. McCabe, H. 2008. End-of-life decision-making, the principle of double effect, and the devil’s choice: A response to Roger Magnusson. Journal of Law and Medicine 16: 74–84.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. McStay, R. 2003. Terminal sedation: Palliative care for intractable pain, post Glucksberg and Quill. American Journal of Law & Medicine 29: 45–76.Google Scholar
  61. Magnusson, R. 2002. Angels of death: Exploring the euthanasia underground. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Magnusson, R. 2004a. Euthanasia: Above ground, below ground. Journal of Medical Ethics 30: 441–446.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Magnusson, R. 2004b. ‘Underground euthanasia’ and the harm minimization debate. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 32: 486–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Magnusson, R. 2006. The devil’s choice: Re-thinking law, ethics, and symptom relief in palliative care. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 34: 559–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Mendelson, D. and T. Jost. 2003. A comparative study of the law of palliative care and end-of-life treatment. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 31: 130–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Meuser, T., C. Pietruck, L. Radbruch, P. Stute, K. Lehmann, and S. Grond. 2001. Symptoms during cancer pain treatment following WHO-guidelines: A longitudinal follow-up study of symptom prevalence, severity and etiology. Pain 93: 247–257.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Miccinesi, G., S. Fischer, E. Paci, B. Onwuteaka-Philipsen, C. Cartwright, A. van der Heide, et al. 2004. Physicians’ attitudes towards end-of-life decisions: A comparison between seven countries. Social Science & Medicine 60: 1961–1974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Morita, T., J. Tsunoda, S. Inoue, and S. Chihara. 2001. Effect of high dose opioids and sedatives on survival in terminally ill cancer patients. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 21: 282–289.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Name withheld. 1998. It’s over Debbie. Journal of the American Medical Association 259: 272.Google Scholar
  70. Neil, D., C. Coady, J. Thompson, and H. Kuhse. 2007. End-of-life decisions in medical practice: A survey of doctors in Victoria (Australia). Journal of Medical Ethics 33: 721–725.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. O’Connor, M., D. Kissane, and O. Spruyt. 1999. Sedation in the terminally ill—A clinical perspective. Monash Bioethics Review 18: 17–27.Google Scholar
  72. Onwuteaka-Philipsen, B., A. van der Heide, D. Koper, I. Keij-Deerenberg, J. Rietjens, M. Rurup, et al. 2003. Euthanasia and other end-of-life decisions in the Netherlands in 1990, 1995, and 2001. Lancet 362: 395–399.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. O’Reilly, K. 2008. Montana court OKs doctor-assisted suicide. American Medical News, at: (posted 29 December) (accessed 5 June 2009).
  74. O’Reilly, K. 2009. Montana judge rejects stay of physician-assisted suicide ruling. American Medical News, at: (posted 29 January) (accessed 5 June 2009).
  75. Palmer, H. 1957. Dr Adams’ trial for murder. Criminal Law Review: 365–377.Google Scholar
  76. Parker, M., C. Cartwright, and G. Williams. 2008. Impact of speciality on attitudes of Australian medical practitioners to end-of-life decisions. Medical Journal of Australia 188: 450–456.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Pattin, M.P., A. van der Heide, L. Ganzini, G. van der Wal, and B.D. Onwuteaka-Philipsen. 2007. Legal physician-assisted dying in Oregon and the Netherlands: Evidence concerning the impact on patients in “vulnerable” groups. Journal of Medical Ethics 33: 591–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Pollard, B. and R. Winton. 1993. Why doctors and nurses must not kill patients. Medical Journal of Australia 128: 426–429.Google Scholar
  79. Pretty v The United Kingdom. 2002. 2346/02 [2002] ECHR 427 (20 April 2002).Google Scholar
  80. Quill, T. 1991. Death and dignity: A case of individualized decision making. New England Journal of Medicine 324: 691–694.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Quill, T. 1993. The ambiguity of clinical intentions. The New England Journal of Medicine 329: 1039–1040.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Quill, T., B. Lo, and D. Brock. 1997. Palliative options of last resort: A comparison of voluntarily stopping eating and drinking, terminal sedation, physician-assisted suicide, and voluntary active euthanasia. Journal of the American Medical Association 278: 2099–2104.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. R v Woollin. 1999. 1 AC 82.Google Scholar
  84. R (Pretty) v DPP. 2002. 1 AC 800.Google Scholar
  85. R v Maxwell. 2003. VSC 278 (24 July 2003).Google Scholar
  86. Re A (children)(conjoined twins). 2000. 4 All ER 961–1070.Google Scholar
  87. Re B (adult: refusal of medical treatment). 2002. 2 All ER 449.Google Scholar
  88. R v Shirley Justins. 2008. NSWSC 1194 (12 November 2008).Google Scholar
  89. Re T. 1992. 4 All ER 649.Google Scholar
  90. Rietjens, J., J. van Delden, B. Onwuteaka-Philipsen, H. Buiting, P. van der Maas, and A. van der Heide. 2008. Continuous deep sedation for patients nearing death in the Netherlands: Descriptive study. British Medical Journal 336: 810–813.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Rodriguez v British Columbia (Attorney General). 1993. 3 S.C.R. 519.Google Scholar
  92. St George’s Healthcare NHS Trust v S; R v Collins & Ors, ex parte S. 1998. 3 All ER 673.Google Scholar
  93. Seale, C. 2006. National survey of end-of-life decisions made by UK medical practitioners. Palliative Medicine 20: 3–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Shipman Inquiry, The. 2005. Shipman: The final report. London: UK Home Office, at: (accessed 29 August 2008).
  95. Singer, P. 2002. Ms B and Diane Pretty: A commentary. Journal of Medical Ethics 28: 234.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Smith II, G.P. 1998. Terminal sedation as palliative care: Revalidating a right to a good death. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 7: 382–387.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Souter, F. 2008. His life in her hands. Good Weekend. (The Sydney Morning Herald Magazine). 2 August 2008, pp. 18–26.Google Scholar
  98. Steinbrook, R. 2008. Physician-assisted death—From Oregon to Washington State. New England Journal of Medicine 359: 2513–2515.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Sulmasy, D. 1999. The rule of double effect: Clearing up the double talk. Archives of Internal Medicine 159: 545–550.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Syme, R. 1998a. Ending the pain of dying. Age. 2 November, p 15.Google Scholar
  101. Syme, R. 1998b. The father, son and euthanasia. Age. 13 April.Google Scholar
  102. Syme, R. 1999. Reply from Rodney Syme. Monash Bioethics Review: 34–40.Google Scholar
  103. Syme, R. 2008. A good death: An argument for voluntary euthanasia. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar
  104. Tallis, R. 1996. Is there a slippery slope? Times Literary Supplememt. 12 January, p. 3.Google Scholar
  105. Vacco v. Quill 521 U.S. 793. 1997.Google Scholar
  106. van der Heide, A., L. Deliens, K. Faisst, T. Nilstun, M. Norup, E. Paci, et al. 2003. End-of-life decision-making in six European countries: Descriptive study. Lancet 361: 345–350.Google Scholar
  107. van der Heide, A., B.D. Onwuteaka-Philipsen, M.L. Rurup, H.M. Buiting, J.J.M. van Delden, J.E. Hanssen-de Wolf, et al. 2007. End-of-life practices in the Netherlands under the Euthanasia Act. New England Journal of Medicine 356: 1957–1965.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Washington v. Glucksberg 521 U.S. 702. 1997.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sydney Law SchoolUniversity of SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations