The Social Impacts of Nanotechnology: an Ethical and Political Analysis
- 679 Downloads
This paper attempts some predictions about the social consequences of nanotechnology and the ethical issues they raise. I set out four features of nanotechnology that are likely to be important in determining its impact and argue that nanotechnology will have significant social impacts in—at least—the areas of health and medicine, the balance of power between citizens and governments, and the balance of power between citizens and corporations. More importantly, responding to the challenge of nanotechnology will require confronting “philosophical” questions about the sort of society we wish to create and the role that technology might play in creating it. This in turn will require developing institutions and processes that allow the public to wield real power in relation to technological trajectories. My ultimate contention is that the immediate task established by the likely social impacts of nanotechnology is not so much to develop an ethics of nanotechnology as to facilitate an ethical conversation about nanotechnology.
KeywordsNanotechnology Ethics Social impact
- Altmann, J. 2006. Military nanotechnology: Potential applications and preventive arms control. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Berube, D.M. 2006. Nano-hype: the truth behind the nanotechnology buzz. Amherst, New York: Promethus Books.Google Scholar
- Boot, M. 2006. The paradox of military technology. New Atlantis (Washington, D.C.), (Fall), 13–31.Google Scholar
- Crandall, B.C. 1997. Nanotechnology: speculations on global abundance. Cambridge, Massachusetts and London, England: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Drexler, E. 1986. Engines of creation. New York: Anchor Press.Google Scholar
- Drexler, E., C. Peterson, and G. Pergamit. 1991. Unbounding the future: The nanotechnology revolution. New York: William Morrow and Company, Inc.Google Scholar
- Dunlap, Charles J. Junior. 1999. Technology: Recomplicating moral life for the nation’s defenders. Parameters: US Army War College Quarterly Autumn, 24–53.Google Scholar
- ETC Group. 2004. Down on the farm. Ottawa: ETC Group.Google Scholar
- Friends of the Earth. 2006. Size does matter. Nanotechnology: Small science—big questions. Special issue (Issue 97) of Chain Reaction.Google Scholar
- Gingrich, N. 1999. We must fund the scientific revolution. Washington Post, October 18. In Societal Implications of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, eds. M.C. Roco, and W.S. Bainbridge, 270. New York: Springer, 2001.Google Scholar
- Hamilton, C. 2004. Growth fetish. London; Stirling, VA: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
- Hepburn, J. 2006. Technology, risk and values—from genetic engineering to nanotechnology. Chain Reaction 97:40–41.Google Scholar
- Hodge, G., D. Bowman, & K. Ludlow (eds.). 2007. New global frontiers in regulation: The age of nanotechnology. Cheltenham UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
- Hood, E. 2004. Nanotechnology: looking as we leap. Environmental Health Perspectives 112(13):A741–A749.Google Scholar
- Joy, W. 2000. Why the future doesn’t need us. Wired 8.04:238–262.Google Scholar
- Lane, R.E. 2000. The loss of happiness in market democracies. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- Matsuura, J.H. 2006. Nanotechnology regulation and policy worldwide. Norwood, MA: Arteck House.Google Scholar
- Mehta, Michael D. 2002. Privacy and survelliance: how to avoid a nano-panoptic future. Canadian Chemical News November-December, 31–33.Google Scholar
- Meridian Institute. 2005. Nanotechnology and the poor: Opportunities and risks. Available http://www.meridian-nano.org/gdnp/NanoandPoor.pdf. Accessed 8 January 2009.
- Miller, G., and R. Senjen. 2006. What would a nano world look like? Chain Reaction 97:12–14.Google Scholar
- Mulhall, D. 2002. Our molecular future: How nanotechnology, robotics, genetics, and Artificial Intelligence will transform our world. Amherst, N.Y: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
- National Science and Technology Council. 1999. Nanotechnology: Shaping the world atom by atom. National Science and Technology Council: Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
- Nanotechnology, N. 2007. Beware of big brother. Nature Nanotechnology 2(1):1.Google Scholar
- Ratner, D., and M.A. Ratner. 2003. Nanotechnology and homeland security: New weapons for new wars. New York: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering. 2004. Nanoscience and nanotechnologies: Opportunities and uncertainties. London: Royal Society & Royal Academy of Engineering.Google Scholar
- Senjen, R. 2006a. Small nano + large corporations = giant profits. Chain Reaction 97:32–34.Google Scholar
- Senjen, R. 2006b. Nanobiotechnology: the “science” of vandalising life. Chain Reaction 97:30–31.Google Scholar
- Smalley, R.E. 2001. Of chemistry, love and nanobots. Scientific American (September):76–77.Google Scholar
- Sparrow, R. 2007b. Negotiating the nanodivides. In New global frontiers in regulation: The age of nanotechnology, eds. G. Hodge, D. Bowman, and K. Ludlow. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
- Sparrow, R. 2008. Hypocrisy about nanotechnology is a worrying sign. Friends of the Earth Nanotechnology Project. Available via http://nano.foe.org.au/node/191.
- Stix, G. 1996. Waiting for breakthroughs. Scientific American (April):94–99.Google Scholar
- Swiss, R. 2004. Nanotechnology: Small matters, many unknowns. Available via http://www.swissre.com/pws/research%20publications/risk%20and%20expertise/risk%20perception/nanotechnology_small_matter_many_unknowns_pdf_page.html.
- UNESCO. 2006. The ethics and politics of nanotechnology. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation.Google Scholar
- U. S. Environmental Protection Authority. 2007. Nanotechnology white paper. Washington: Science Policy Council, US Environmental Protection Agency. Available at http://es.epa.gov/ncer/nano/publications/whitepaper12022005.pdf.
- Van Den Hoven, Jerome. 2006. Nanotechnology and privacy: the instructive case of RFID. The International Journal of Applied Philosophy 20(2):215–228.Google Scholar
- Wood, S., R. Jones, and A. Geldart. 2003. The social and economic challenges of nanotechnology. Swindon, UK: Economic and Social Research Council.Google Scholar