Advertisement

Journal of Bioethical Inquiry

, Volume 6, Issue 1, pp 9–12 | Cite as

Introduction: The Ethical Challenges of Nanotechnologies

  • Alan PetersenEmail author
Article

Abstract

Nanotechnologies are expected to have a substantial impact on our lives in the future. However, the nanotechnology field is characterised by many uncertainties and debates surrounding the characterisation of technologies, the nature of the applications, the potential benefits and the likely risks. Given the rapid development of nanotechnologies, it is timely to consider what, if any, novel ethical challenges are posed by developments and how best to address these given the attendant uncertainties. The three articles which comprise this symposium consider the philosophical, regulatory and risk perception and communication questions that arise from this arena.

Keywords

Nanotechnology Nanotechnologies Ethics Public engagement Risk Communication Regulation 

References

  1. Ebbeson, M. 2008. The role of the humanities and social sciences in nanotechnology research and development. NanoEthics 2: 1–13. doi: 10.1007/s11569-008-0033-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Evans, J. 2002. Playing God?: Human genetic engineering and the rationalization of public bioethical debate. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  3. Gavelin, K., R. Wilson, and R. Doubleday. 2007. Democratic technologies?: The final report of the nanotechnology engagement group. London: Involve.Google Scholar
  4. Goldenberg, L. 2006. Nanotechnologies and society in Canada. In Nanotechnology: Risk, ethics and law, ed. G. Hunt, and M. Mehta. London and Sterling, VA: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  5. Market Attitude Research Services. 2008. Australian community attitudes held about nanotechnology - trends 2005 to 2008. Canberra: DIISR.Google Scholar
  6. Petersen, A., and A. Anderson. 2007. A question of balance or blind faith?: Scientists’ and science policymakers’ representations of the benefits and risks of nanotechnologies. NanoEthics 1: 243–256. doi: 10.1007/s11569-007-0021-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Pidgeon, N., B.H. Harthorn, K. Bryan, and T. Rogers-Hayden. (2008). Deliberating the risks of nanotechnologies for energy and health applications in the United states and United Kingdom, Nature Nanotechnology. Published Online, 7(December).Google Scholar
  8. Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering. 2004. Nanoscience and nanotechnologies: Opportunities and uncertainties. London: Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering.Google Scholar
  9. Wilsdon, J., and R. Willis. 2004. See-through science: Why public engagement needs to move upstream. London: Demos.Google Scholar
  10. Woodrow Wilson Project on Emerging Nanotechnology. 2008. A nanotechnology consumer product inventory. Washington DC, Woodrow Wilson (available at: http://www.nanotechproject.org/inventories/consumer/) Accessed 10 January 2009.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sociology, School of Political and Social InquiryMonash UniversityMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations