The Biopolitics of Bioethics and Disability

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. 1.

    Jasanoff, S. (2005). Designs on nature: Science and democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Foucault, M. (1978). In Hurley R., translator. The history of sexuality, volume 1: An introduction. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Foucault, M. (2003). Lecture of 17 March 1976. In M. Bertani, & A. Fontana (Eds.), “Society must be defended”: Lectures at Collège de France, 1975–1976. New York: Picador Translated by D. Macey.

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Tremain, S. (2005). Foucault, governmentality, and critical disability theory: An introduction. In S. Tremain (Ed.), Foucault and the government of disability. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Tremain, S. (2006). Reproductive freedom, self-regulation, and the government of impairment in utero. Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 21(1), 35–43.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Vintage. Translated by A. Sheridan.

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Gordon, C. (1991). Governmental rationality: An introduction. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect: studies in governmentality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Tremain, S. (2001). On the government of disability. Social Theory and Practice, 27(4), 617–636.

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Terzi, L. (2004). The social model of disability: A philosophical critique. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 21(2), 141–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Oliver, M. (1990). The politics of disablement. London: Macmillan Education.

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Union for the Physically Impaired Against Segregation (UPIAS) (1976). The fundamental principles of disability. London: Union for the Physically Impaired Against Segregation.

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Oliver, M. (1996). Understanding disability: From theory to practice. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Tremain, S. (1998). Feminist approaches to naturalizing disabled bodies; or, does the social model of disability rest upon a mistake? Paper presented at the Society for Disability Studies Conference, Oakland, CA.

  14. 14.

    Buchanan, A., Brock, D. W., Daniels, N., & Wikler, D. I. (2000). From chance to choice: Genetics and justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shelley Tremain.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tremain, S. The Biopolitics of Bioethics and Disability. Bioethical Inquiry 5, 101–106 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-008-9105-6

Download citation