Skip to main content

The Epistemology and Ethics of Journal Reviewing: A Second Look

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. 1.

    Cheek, J. (2006). What’s in a number? Issues in providing evidence of impact and quality of research(ers). Qualitative Health Research, 16, 423–435.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Rennie, D. R. (2003). Editorial peer review: Its development and rationale. In F. Godlee, & T. Jefferson (Eds.) Peer review in health sciences (pp. 1–13). London: BMJ Books.

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Komesaroff, P. A., Kerridge, I., & Jordens, C., (Writing group). (2008). Journal of bioethical inquiry reviewing policy. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 5(1).

  4. 4.

    Callaham, M. (2003). The evaluation and training of peer reviewers. In F. Godlee, & T. Jefferson (Eds.) Peer review in health sciences (pp. 164–82). London: BMJ Books.

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Smith, R. (2006). Peer review: A flawed process at the heart of science and journals. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 99, 178–182.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Jefferson, T., Rudin, M., Brodney Folse, S., Davidoff, F. (2003). Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies. Cochrane Db Syst Rev Issue 4. Art. No.: MR000016. DOI 10.1002/14651858.MR000016.pub3.

  7. 7.

    Spier, R. E. (2002). Peer review and innovation. Science and Engineering Ethics, 8, 99–108.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Bingham, C. (2003). Peer review on the internet: Are there faster, fairer, more effective methods of peer review? In F. Godlee, & T. Jefferson (Eds.) Peer review in health sciences (pp. 277–96). London: BMJ Books.

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Baez, B. (2002). Confidentiality and peer review: The paradox of secrecy in academe. Review of Higher Education, 25, 163–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Godlee, F. (2002). Making reviewers visible: Openness, accountability, and credit. JAMA, 287, 2762–2765.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul A. Komesaroff.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Komesaroff, P.A., Kerridge, I. & Lipworth, W. The Epistemology and Ethics of Journal Reviewing: A Second Look. Bioethical Inquiry 5, 3–6 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-008-9093-6

Download citation