Skip to main content

Negotiating Values: Narrative and Exposition

Abstract

In this paper I focus on the limits of narrative by asking what kinds of things narratives do, and what kinds of texts do related things in other ways. In particular I focus on how narrative genres organise time in relation to value, drawing on functional linguistic models of temporality and evaluation. From a linguistic perspective, the various narrative genres negotiate different kinds of solidarity with listeners, and so the limits of narrative materialise various possibilities for communing in a culture, alongside the potentialities for construing community through related and other genres of discourse—since in general, the limits/possibilities of our language (and attendant modalities of communication) are the limits/possibilities of our social world.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Notes

  1. 1.

    See also Hasan, Martin; Chafe includes related work from a west-coast functionalist discourse perspective; Toolan provides an excellent language focussed introduction to narrative analysis [1518].

  2. 2.

    I acknowledge that Labov's work taken as a whole allows for optional elements of structure and evaluation conflated with other stages rather than operating as a stage on its own; but this simply muddies the waters as far as providing a principled tool for text analysis is concerned [2326].

  3. 3.

    For an alternative translation see Krog, who worked as a reporter during the hearings and documented this harrowing experience in her extraordinary Country of my Skull [29].

  4. 4.

    The observation is a story genre which reflectively appreciates the significance of events; see Jordens [2] for discussion.

References

  1. 1.

    Johnson, D. (2002). Lighting the way: Reconciliation stories. Sydney: The Federation Press iii.

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Jordens, C. (2002). Reading spoken stories for values: A discursive study of cancer survivors and their professional careers. PhD thesis, Medicine: University of Sydney.

  3. 3.

    Jordens, C. F. C., Little, M., Paul, K., & Sayers, E.-J. (2001). Life disruption and generic complexity: A social linguistic analysis of narratives of cancer illness. Social Science and Medicine, 53, 1227–1236.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Jordens, C., & Little, M. (2004). In this scenario, I do this, for these reasons: Narrative, genre and ethical reasoning in the clinic. Social Science & Medicine, 58, 1635–1645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as a social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Edward Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (1999). Construing experience through language: A language-based approach to cognition. London: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar.(3rd ed.). London: Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Martin, J. R., & Rose, D. (2003). Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Martin, J. R., & Rose, D. (2008). Genre relations: Mapping culture. London: Equinox.

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Martin, J. R., & White, P. R. R. (2005). The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Russell, E. (2004). The shack that dad built. Sydney: Little Hare Books.

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    The Sydney Morning Herald. 2002 Nov 27: 21 (col. 8).

  13. 13.

    Pluml G. (1988). Text and contextual conditioning in spoken English: A genre-based approach, volumes 1 and 2. Nottingham: Department of English Studies, University of Nottingham (Monographs in Systemic Linguistics).

  14. 14.

    Rothery, J. & Stenglin, M. (1997). Entertaining and instructing: Exploring experience through story. In F. Christie, & J. R. Martin (eds.), Genre and Institutions: Social processes in the workplace and school (pp. 231–263).

  15. 15.

    Hasan, R. (1984). The nursery tale as a genre. Nottingham linguistic circular 13 (Special Issue on Systemic Linguistics);71–102.

  16. 16.

    Martin, J. R. (1996). Evaluating disruption: Symbolising theme in junior secondary narrative. In H. Hasan, & G. Williams (Eds.) Literacy in society (pp. 124–171). London: Longman (Language and Social Life).

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Chafe, W. L. (1980). The pear stories: Cognitive, cultural, and linguistic aspects of narrative production. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Toolan, M. J. (1988). Narrative: A critical linguistic introduction. London: Routledge (Interface Series).

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Labov, W., & Waletzky, J. (1967). Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. In J. Helm (Ed.) Essays on the verbal and visual arts. Proceedings of the 1966 Spring Meeting of the American Ethnological Society (pp. 12–44). Seattle: University of Washington Press. Republished in Bamberg, M. G. W., Oral versions of personal experience: three decades of narrative analysis. Journal of Narrative and Life History. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1997, 7: 3–38.

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Martin, J. R., & Plum, G. (1997). Construing experience: Some story genres. Bamberg, pp. 299–308.

  21. 21.

    Bamberg, M. G. W. (1997). Oral versions of personal experience: Three decades of narrative analysis. Journal of Narrative and Life History (vol. 7, pp. 1–4). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Eggins, S., & Slade, D. (1997). Analysing casual conversation. London: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Labov, W. (1972). The transformation of experience in narrative syntax. Language in the inner city pp. 354–396. Philadephia: Pennsylvania University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Labov, W. (1982). Speech actions and reactions in personal narrative. In D. Tannen (Ed.) Analysing discourse: Text and talk. Georgetown University Round Table on Language and Linguistics 1981. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Labov, W. (1984). Intensity. In D. Schiffrin (Ed.) Meaning, Form, and use in context: Linguistic applications. Georgetown University Roundtable on Language and Linguistics (pp. 43–70). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Labov, W. (1997). Some further steps in narrative analysis (pp. 395–415). Bamberg.

  27. 27.

    Tutu Desmond, M. (1999). No future without forgiveness pp. 47–48. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Truth and Reconciliation Commission (1995). Promotion of National Unity and Reconciliation Act, South Africa 1995. Excerpt from the Explanatory Memorandum to the Parliamentary Bill. Online http://www.doj.gov.za/trc/legal/bill.htm.

  29. 29.

    Krog, A. (1999). Country of my skull. London: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Iedema, R. (2003). Discourses of post-bureaucratic organization. Amsterdam: Benjamins Document Design Companion Series Vol. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Muntigl, P. (2004). Narrative counselling: Social and linguistic processes of change. Amsterdam: Benjamins (Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture).

    Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Mandela, N. (1995). Long walk to freedom: The autobiography of Nelson Mandela (p. 750). Little Brown & Co.

  33. 33.

    Martin, J. R., & Wodak, R., editors. (2004). Re/reading the past: Critical and functional perspectives on discourses of history. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

  34. 34.

    Lemke, J. (1998). Multiplying meaning: Visual and verbal semiotics in scientific text. In J. R. Martin, & R. Veel (Eds.) Reading science: Critical and functional perspectives on discourses of science (pp. 87–113). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Bernstein, B. (1996). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity: Theory, research, critique. London: Taylor & Francis [Revised Edition 2000].

  36. 36.

    Martin, J. R. (2002). A universe of meaning—How many practices? In A. M. Johns (Ed.)Genre in the classroom: Multiple perspectives (pp. 269–278). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Christie, F., & Martin, J. R. (eds.) (1997). Genre and institutions: Social processes in the workplace and school. London: Pinter (Open Linguistics Series).

  38. 38.

    Mandela, N. (1996). The Illustrated Long Walk to Freedom: the autobiography of Nelson Mandela. London: Little, Brown and Company.

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. R. Martin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Martin, J.R. Negotiating Values: Narrative and Exposition. Bioethical Inquiry 5, 41–55 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-008-9091-8

Download citation

Keywords

  • Negotiating values
  • Narrative
  • Exposition