Probing Aromaticity of Borozene Through Optical and Dielectric Response: A Theoretical Study

Open Access
Nano Express


In this work, we report electronic structure calculations aimed at computing the linear optical absorption spectrum and static dipole polarizablity of a newly proposed boron-based planar aromatic compound borozene (B12H6). For the purpose, we use the semiempirical INDO model Hamiltonian, accompanied by large-scale correlation calculations using the multi-reference singles-doubles configuration-interaction (MRSDCI) approach. We present detailed predictions about the energetics, polarization properties, and the nature of many-particle states contributing to various peaks in the linear absorption spectrum. Our results can be used to characterize this material in future optical absorption experiments. We also argue that one can deduce the aromaticity of the cluster from the optical absorption and static polarizability results.


Borozene Optical properties Aromaticity Semi-empirical models 


Next to carbon-based chemistry, boron chemistry is surely one of the most active areas of research [1]. Boron exhibits a variety of polymorphisms which involve three-center two-electron (3c–2e) bonds [2], planar aromatic structures [3], nano-tubes [4], nano-ribbons [5], and fullerene-like cages [6]. From the point of view of nano-technology, aromatic boron materials are of particular interest, because delocalized electron clouds in these materials will lead to large linear and non-linear optical susceptibilities, just like corresponding carbon-based structures. In order to achieve aromaticity, one needs to have a planar structure giving rise to π-orbitals. Indeed, aromaticity in boron-based clusters has been the subject of many recent investigations. Zhai et al. [7] in a recent joint theoretical and experiment study probed the issue of planarity and aromaticity of boron clusters. In another theory--experiment study, Zhai et al. [8] reported the discovery of planar boron clusters B8 and B9 clusters with “molecular wheel”-like structures and exhibiting both σ and π aromaticity. Aihara and coworkers [9] presented a theoretical investigation of aromaticity into several planar and quasi-planar boron clusters using the concept of “topological resonance energy”. Johansson [10] demonstrated theoretically the existence of strong magnetically induced ring currents in B20 and other toroidal clusters of boron, as an evidence of underlying aromaticity. Rincon et al. [11] theoretically demonstrated the σ aromaticity in several planar boron clusters performing an analysis of the electron-localization function (ELF). Similarly, Wu et al. [12] using an ab initio approach investigated the aromaticity of planar boron--carbon complex C6B12−2. Another possible approach to achieve planarity, and, therefore, aromaticity in boron clusters is by hydrogenation of boron clusters. For example Alexandrova et al. [13] have demonstrated by means of theoretical calculations, that quasi-planar B7 cluster, upon hydrogenation, acquires a planar structure for B7H2. In a recent theoretical work, Szwacki et al. [14] proposed a novel planar aromatic cluster which can be obtained by hydrogenation of quasi-planar B12 cluster. They argued that the cluster is aromatic by performing a detailed analysis of its molecular orbitals and by examining magnetic properties such as nucleus-independent chemical shift (NICS), and anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility (AMS). Having thus demonstrated the similarities between the aromaticities of this cluster and benzene (including the number of π-electrons), they called it the boron analogue of benzene and named it borozene [14]. Encouraged by the work of Szwacki et al. [14], Forte et al. [15] performed ab initio calculations to predict larger aromatic compounds which can be constructed using borozene as formula unit. It is a well-known fact that the carbon-based aromatic materials including molecules such as benzene, napthalene, anthracene, and longer π-conjugated polymers exhibit intense linear and non-linear optical response [16]. Therefore, it is of considerable interest to explore similar properties of aromatic materials consisting of elements other than carbon. With this aim in mind, here we present a systematic theoretical study, based upon a large-scale configuration-interaction (CI) methodology, of linear optical response of borozene. We believe our results will be useful in optical characterization experiments on this material, as also in exploring its possible application in nano-optics. Furthermore, we also perform calculations of static polarizability of this cluster, with the aim of exploring the signatures of aromaticity in its dielectric response. Aromaticiy is an intuitive concept which essentially implies electron delocalization. Therefore, the consequences of this delocalization of electrons will be manifest in various properties of materials, including their magnetic as well as dielectric response. With the electrons delocalized along the plane of the molecule for conjugated systems as benzene, one would expect its “in-plane” dielectric response to be significantly more than its “perpendicular” response. Thus, this anisotropy in the static polarizability tensor αij can also be viewed as a signature of the aromaticity, in such systems. Indeed, this anisotropy in α has been verified theoretically by other authors in the past calculations on conjugated molecules [17, 18, 19] and has been used to formulate an “aromaticity scale” for such systems [17].

Remainder of the paper is organized as follows. In “Introduction” section, we briefly describe the theoretical methodology employed for the present calculations and also discuss the geometry of the molecule. This is followed by the presentation and discussion of our results in “Results and Discussion”. Finally, in “Conclusions” section, we present our conclusions.

Theoretical Methodology

The basic structure of borozene is presented in Fig. 1, and it corresponds to point symmetry group D3h[14]. Before proceeding with our calculations, for the purpose of verification, we decided to perform the geometry optimization on our own using the B3LYP-based hybrid DFT approach employing the 6-311++g(d) basis set as implemented in GAUSSIAN03 program [20]. The optimized structure thus obtained belonged to the D3h point group symmetry with uniform value of B–H bond length 1.18 Å , and four distinct values of B–B bond lengths 1.63, 1.66, 1.81, and 1.86 Å. We, however, are interested in exploring an even more symmetric structure of borozene, so as to make the comparison with benzene more transparent. Therefore, we separately optimized a highly symmetric structure of borozene (S-borozene, henceforth) with identical B–B bond lengths, in addition to the B–H ones. For this purpose, as well as for the linear absorption spectrum calculations, we adopted an INDO model Hamiltonian [21] based approach implemented recently in a computer program developed by us [22]. INDO model is an effective valence-electron approach, employing a Slater-type minimal basis set, and some semi-empirical parameters [21]. The geometry optimization using our computer program, performed at the Hartree-Fock (HF) level (INDO-HF, henceforth), yielded bond lengths 1.65 Å for the B–B bond and 1.18 Å for the B–H bond. These values agree perfectly with 1.18 Å for the B–H bond length reported both by Szwacki et al. [14] and Forte et al. [15], and the average value of B–B bond length 1.649 Å reported by Forte et al. [15]. The total energy of the geometry-optimized S-borozene was higher than that of the borozene with distinct B–B bond lengths by ≈0.8 eV at the INDO-HF level.
Figure 1

(Color online) Structure of S-borozene considered in this work, assumed to lying in the xy-plane. Optimized bond lengths at INDO-HF level are B–B = 1.65 Å and B–H = 1.18 Å. Yellow dots indicate boron atoms and violet ones hydrogen atoms

Next, large-scale correlation calculations were performed on the ground and the excited states of S-borozene, using the multi-reference singles-doubles configuration-interaction (MRSDCI) approach as implemented in the MELD package [23] but employing the one- and two-electron matrix elements of the INDO Hamiltonian supplied by our program [22]. Thus, these correlated calculations were entirely within the INDO model and will be called INDO-MRSDCI calculations, henceforth. During these calculations, point symmetry group C2v was utilized, as against the D3h symmetry group, because the MELD [23] package is restricted to D2h and its sub-groups. Therefore, we classify the many-electron states of the system in terms of the irreducible representations (irreps) of C2v group. The optical absorption spectra were calculated under the electric-dipole approximation employing the Lorenzian line shape. For both the ground and the excited states, these calculations were performed in an iterative manner, until the optical absorption spectra computed from them converged. We have extensively used this approach in our earlier calculations on conjugated polymers [24, 25, 26, 27] as well as on B12 icosahedral and quasi-planar clusters reported recently [28].

Results and Discussion

Symmetry group C2v consists of four irreps labeled a1,a2,b1, and b2. Assuming that the Cartesian xy-plane lies in the plane of the molecule (cf. Fig. 1), the symmetry adapted electronic structure of the HF ground state obtained from our code is 1a122a121b123a122b124a121b223b125a124b126a127a128a125b122b221a229a126b127b1210a128b12, leading to 1A1 many-particle configuration. Some of the lowest unoccupied orbitals in the ascending order of energy are 3b2, 2a2, 4b2, 11a1, 9b1 etc. Of all the orbitals, the ones belonging to a2 and b2 irreps are π orbitals and a1 and b1 are of σ type. Thus, we note that the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) is a σ orbital, while the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) is a π orbital. For the sake of visualization, some of the orbitals are given in Fig. 2.
Figure 2

(Color online) Molecular orbitals (iso plots) of S-borozene from HOMO−1 to LUMO+1, obtained from the INDO-HF calculations

While our LUMO orbital matches perfectly with that reported by Szwacki et al. [14], however, we have a disagreement on the nature of the HOMO orbital which was reported to be of π-type by them [14], but we obtain it to be of σ-type within the INDO model. In order to rule out the possibility that this disagreement could due to the use of the INDO model, or due to the S-borozene geometry, we studied the nature of the HOMO obtained using the 6-311++g(d) basis set both at RHF and DFT-B3LYP levels of ab initio theory [20] at various geometries. In all such DFT calculations, it turned out to be a σ-type orbital, but for the RHF calculations, the nature of HOMO was highly geometry sensitive with some geometries yielding it to be σ-type, while others of π-type. This, in our opinion, is a significant difference between the electronic structures of benzene (whose HOMO and LUMO both are π type) and borozene. Thus, borozene, in our opinion is an example of both σ and π conjugation because, close to the Fermi level, occupied orbitals are mainly of σ type, while the unoccupied ones (LUMOLUMO + 1, LUMO + 2) are of π type. Before presenting the results of our calculations of linear optical absorption spectrum of S-borozene, we would like to discuss the influence of geometry on the optical properties of borozene, considering the fact that our calculations were performed on a highly symmetric conformer S-borozene. For the purpose, we performed the optical absorption calculations at the singles-CI (SCI) calculations both on the lowest energy structure of borozene with unequal B–B bond lengths and S-borozene. We found that qualitatively, at the SCI level, spectra were very similar for both the geometries, except that for S-borozene it was slightly red-shifted compared to borozene. The first peak for borozene in this SCI calculation was obtained at 2.6 eV in perfect agreement with excitation energy of the first excited reported by Szwacki et al. [14], while that for S-borozene was located at 2.4 eV.

Next, we present and discuss the results of our INDO-MRSDCI-based optical absorption calculations on S-borozene. Comparisons are also made with the absorption spectra of quasi-planar B12 bare cluster, and also with that of benzene. As the ground state of the system is 1A1, as per electric-dipole selection rules, it can make linear optical transitions to excited states belonging to symmetry manifolds 1A1, 1B1, and 1B2 through photons polarized along the y-axis, x-axis, and z-axis, respectively. Thus, transitions to 1A1 and 1B1 are through photons polarized in the plane of the molecule (xy-plane in the present case), while those to 1B2 will be through perpendicularly polarized photons. The INDO-MRSDCI calculations presented here involved construction and diagonalization of very large CI matrices running into millions of configurations, because simultaneously several states were targeted. For example, for the 1A1 symmetry manifold, the total number of configurations was more than 2.1 millions, while those for 1B1 and 1B2 manifolds were in excess of 2.5, and 3 millions, respectively. Because of the large-scale nature of these calculations, we believe that the results account for electron correlation effects properly.

In Fig. 3, we present the combined optical absorption spectrum of S-borozene, obtained from our INDO-MRSDCI calculations. As is obvious from the figures that the first absorption feature is a small peak located at 2.25 eV, corresponding to a z-polarized transition into a B2 state. The many-particle wave function of this peak consists mainly of two single excitations HL + 1 and H − 1→L(HHOMO;LLUMO), both of which are of σ→π* type. After this feature at 2.25 eV, the next peak follows after a large gap of ≈5 eV and is due to two closely placed states at 7.38 eV (B1-type) and 7.55 eV (A1-type). Thus, this intense peak can be reached through photons which are polarized in the molecular plane, but not through the z-polarized ones. The many-particle wave functions of both these states are dominated by singly excited configurations, with the main configurations being |HL + 3〉 for the B1 state, and |H − 1→L + 3〉 for the A1 state. Thus, both these states correspond to σ→σ* transitions.
Figure 3

Linear optical absorption spectrum of S-borozene, computed using the INDO-MRSDCI approach. Important peaks, along with their polarization characteristics, are labeled. A line width of 0.1 eV was used to compute the spectrum

Peak III of the spectrum, which is a weaker feature located at 8.44 eV, corresponds to a B2 state and can be reached through a z-polarized photon. Many-particle wave function of this state is a mixture of several singly excited configurations which include |H − 4→L〉, |H − 3→L + 1〉, and |HL + 8〉, all of which are σ→π* type excitations. Finally, feature IV near 9.1 eV draws its oscillator strength from the transition of the ground state to three closely spaced excited states of symmetries A1,B1, and B2 located at 9.03 9.01, and 9.19 eV, respectively. The peak has mixed polarization features, out of which x- and y-polarized transitions are more intense when compared to the z-polarized one. The many-particle wave function of the A1 state is dominated by configurations |H − 1→L + 5〉 and |HL + 4〉, while that of B1 state consists mainly of |H − 1→L + 4〉 and |HL + 5〉, all of which are of σ→σ* type. The dominant configurations in the wave function of the B2 state are |HL + 8〉 and |H − 1→L + 7〉, which are of σ→π* type. The absorption spectrum of S-borozene consists of several very intense features beyond 10 eV as well, but we are not discussing them here, given the fact that the ionization potential of this material is estimated close to 9 eV [14].

As Szwacki et al. [14] called borozene the boron analogue of benzene, it is interesting to compare the optical absorption spectra of the two materials. It is a well-known fact that the first dipole allowed transition in benzene is from the 1A1g ground state to the 1E1u excited state with the peak around 6.99 eV, through photons polarized in the plane of the molecule (xy-plane in our case) [29]. This compares very well with peak II (cf. Fig. 3) of S-borozene which is also caused by photons polarized in the the xy-plane and is located around 7.5 eV. The only difference being that for the the 1E1u state in benzene corresponds to a π→π* transition, while the peak II of borozene corresponds to σ→σ* transitions. This supports the hypothesis that borozene is both π and σ conjugated [14]. The difference between the optics of the two materials is the presence of low energy feature (peak I) in S-borozene corresponding to a z-polarized transition, whose counterpart in benzene does not exist.

Recently, we studied the linear optical absorption in quasi-planer B12 cluster which has a convex shape with symmetry group C3v[28] and can be seen as a precursor of borozene [14]. Therefore, a comparison of the optical properties of quasi-planar B12 and borozene can help us understand the influence of hydrogen passivation on the optical properties of B12. In Fig. 4, the linear optical absorption spectra of the two clusters are presented, and it is obvious that the first few peaks of S-borozene occur at lower energies when compared to the quasi-planar B12. Moreover, the HL transition is symmetry forbidden in S-borozene, which is not the case for quasi-planar B12, and indeed contributes to the wave function of the first peak in its spectrum. Thus, the main contribution of hydrogen passivation on the optical properties is that it makes the structure completely planar (as against quasi-planar) leading to conjugation and higher symmetry. Lower energy gap of S-borozene is most certainly a consequence of conjugated nature of electrons in the system.
Figure 4

A comparison of the linear optical absorption spectra between S-borozene (solid line) quasi-planer B12(broken line). The spectrum of S-borozene is significantly red-shifted when compared to that of B12. A line width of 0.1 eV was used to compute the spectrum

In order to explore the aromaticity of borozene, Szwacki et al. [14] computed and discussed its NICS plots and anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility (AMS). With a similar aim, we computed the three diagonal Cartesian components of the static polarizability tensor, αxx, αyy, and αzz of borozene both at the INDO-HF and INDO-SDCI levels. For the purpose, we adopted a finite-field approach and computed the second derivative of the total energy of the system numerically, with respect to the three Cartesian components of the external electric field, whose values were taken to be 0.005 atomic units. The numerical values obtained in our calculations correspond to valence-electron contribution to the polarizability because of the nature of the INDO Hamiltonian. However, our aim here is not to obtain exact numerical values of the polarizability tensor, rather to compare the values of its various components. It is obvious from the results of our calculations presented in Table 1 that: (a) inclusion of correlation effects does not change the values of αii very much, and (b) the values of in-plane components (αxx and αyy) are significantly larger than the perpendicular component αzz. Ab initio calculations performed on conjugated molecules like benzene, [17, 19] anthracene [18], and ethane [19] exhibit similar anisotropy in the components of the polarizability tensor. And, indeed, based upon the magnitude of this “in-plane” vs. “perpendicular” anisotropy, Lazzeretti and Tossell [17] argued for an “aromaticity scale” to characterize π-conjugated systems. Using the same logic, the same anisotropy found in our calculations clearly implies the aromaticity in borozene, but as a consequence of both π and σ conjugation in the plane of the molecule. This fact is also obvious from the optical absorption spectrum of the material in which intensities of the z-polarized peaks are much smaller than those of x- and y-polarized ones.
Table 1

Values of the components of static dipole polarizability tensor of borozene computed using the INDO-HF and INDO-SDCI methods (in atomic units)


αxx = αyy









In conclusion, a correlated study on electronic structure and optical properties of a recently proposed boron-hydrogen cluster, borozene, was presented using the semi-empirical MRSDCI-INDO method. Our calculations of the linear optical absorption spectrum can be used to characterize this substance in future optical absorption experiments. We also calculated the diagonal components of the static polarizability tensor αij of the cluster and found significant larger values for the components along the plane of the molecule, when compared to the one perpendicular to it. This anisotropy in the components of the polarizability tensor implies that the electrons are quite delocalized along the plane of the molecule leading to a considerably larger response to an electric field directed along the plane, when compared to that perpendicular to the plane. Therefore, we argue that this anisotropy in the static dielectric polarizability of the cluster is an evidence of its aromaticity, [17] caused both by σ and π conjugation along the plane of the molecule.



We gratefully acknowledge useful private communications with Dr. C. J. Tymczak in which he clarified the optimized geometry obtained in their calculations on borozene [14].

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.


  1. 1.
    Davidson MG, Hughes AK, Marder TB, Wade K: (eds), Contemporary Boron Chemistry. Edited by: . Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge (UK); 1999.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lipscomb WL: Boron Hydrides. W.A. Benjamin Inc, USA; 1963.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Alexandrova AN, Boldyrev AI, Hua-Jin Zhai, Wang LS: Coord.Chem. Rev.. 2006, 250: 2811. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XoslSjsro%3D] COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XoslSjsro%3D] 10.1016/j.ccr.2006.03.032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ciuparu D, Klie FR, Zhu Y, Pfefferle LJ: Phys. Chem. B. 2004, 108: 3967. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXhvFWltbs%3D] COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXhvFWltbs%3D] 10.1021/jp049301bCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Xu TT, Zheng J, Wu N, Nicholls WA, Roth RJ, Dikin AD, Ruoff RS: Nano Lett.. 2004, 4: 963. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXis1Citrw%3D]; Bibcode number [2004NanoL...4..963X] COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXis1Citrw%3D]; Bibcode number [2004NanoL...4..963X] 10.1021/nl0498785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Szwacki NG, Sadrzadeh A, Yakobson BI: Phys. Rev. Lett.. 2007, 98: 166804. Bibcode number [2007PhRvL..98p6804G] Bibcode number [2007PhRvL..98p6804G] 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.166804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zhai H-J, Kiran B, Li J, Wang L-S: Nat. Mat.. 2003, 2: 827. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXptlemtrY%3D] COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXptlemtrY%3D] 10.1038/nmat1012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhai H-J, Alexandrova AN, Birch KA, Boldyrev AI, Wang L-S: Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.. 2003, 42: 6004. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXltlWi] COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXltlWi] 10.1002/anie.200351874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Aihara J-I, Kanno H, Ishida T: J. Am. Chem. Soc.. 2005, 127: 13324. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXpsVGhtrg%3D] COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXpsVGhtrg%3D] 10.1021/ja053171iCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Johansson MP: J. Phys. Chem. C. 2009, 113: 524. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXhsFais77N] COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXhsFais77N] 10.1021/jp8087918CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rincon L, Almeida R, Alverellos JE, Garcia-Aldea D, Hasmy A, Gonzalez C: Dalton Trans.. 2009, 17: 3328. 10.1039/b818068gCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wu Y-B, Yuan C-X, Yang P: J. Mol. Struct. Theochem. 2006, 765: 35. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XlvFGgs74%3D] COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XlvFGgs74%3D] 10.1016/j.theochem.2006.03.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Alexandrova AN, Koyle E, Boldyrev AI: J. Mol. Model.. 2006, 12: 569. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XosVKjt7w%3D] COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XosVKjt7w%3D] 10.1007/s00894-005-0035-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Szwacki NG, Weber V, Tymczak CJ: Nano. Res. Lett.. 2009, 4: 1085. 10.1007/s11671-009-9362-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Forte G, Magna ALa, Deretzis I, Pucci Bcond-mat arXiv:0908.1153 cond-mat arXiv:0908.1153Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Barford W: Electronic and Optical Properties of Conjugated Polymers. Clarendon Press, Oxford; 2005.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lazzeretti P, Tossell JA: J. Mol. Struct. (Theochem). 1991, 236: 403. 10.1016/0166-1280(91)80030-CCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Perez JJ, Villar HO: Chem. Phys. Lett.. 1992, 188: 604. COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaK38XhsF2gsr4%3D]; Bibcode number [1992CPL...188..604P] COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaK38XhsF2gsr4%3D]; Bibcode number [1992CPL...188..604P] 10.1016/0009-2614(92)80874-BCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hinchliffe A, Soscún H.JM, Struct J. Mol. 1993, 300: 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Frisch MJ, et al.: Gaussian 03, Revision C.02. Gaussian, Inc., Wallingford, CT; 2004.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pople JA, Beveridge DL, Dobosh PA: J. Chem. Phys.. 1967, 47: 2026. COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaF2sXltVaqtL4%3D]; Bibcode number [1967JChPh..47.2026P] COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaF2sXltVaqtL4%3D]; Bibcode number [1967JChPh..47.2026P] 10.1063/1.1712233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sahu S, Shukla A: Comp. Phys. Comm.. 2009, 180: 724. COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXjtF2htrc%3D]; Bibcode number [2009CoPhC.180..724S] COI number [1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXjtF2htrc%3D]; Bibcode number [2009CoPhC.180..724S] 10.1016/j.cpc.2008.11.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    We used modules sortin, cistar, rtsim and tmom of MELD, a molecular electronic structure program from University of Indiana with contributions from E. R. Davidson, L. McMurchie, S. Elbert, and S. Langhoff We used modules sortin, cistar, rtsim and tmom of MELD, a molecular electronic structure program from University of Indiana with contributions from E. R. Davidson, L. McMurchie, S. Elbert, and S. LanghoffGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sony P, Shukla A: J. Chem. Phys.. 2009, 131: 014302. Bibcode number [2009JChPh.131a4302S] Bibcode number [2009JChPh.131a4302S] 10.1063/1.3159670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sony P, Shukla A: Phys. Rev. B. 2007, 75: 155208. Bibcode number [2007PhRvB..75o5208S] Bibcode number [2007PhRvB..75o5208S] 10.1103/PhysRevB.75.155208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sony P, Shukla A: Phys. Rev. B. 2005, 71: 165204. Bibcode number [2005PhRvB..71p5204S] Bibcode number [2005PhRvB..71p5204S] 10.1103/PhysRevB.71.165204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Shukla A: Phys. Rev. B. 2002, 65: 125204. Bibcode number [2002PhRvB..65l5204S] Bibcode number [2002PhRvB..65l5204S] 10.1103/PhysRevB.65.125204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sahu S, Shukla A: submitted for publication. 2009.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Killat U: Z. Physik.. 1973, 263: 83. COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaE3sXlsVGmtrw%3D]; Bibcode number [1973ZPhy..263...83K] COI number [1:CAS:528:DyaE3sXlsVGmtrw%3D]; Bibcode number [1973ZPhy..263...83K] 10.1007/BF02351864CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhysicsIndian Institute of TechnologyMumbaiIndia

Personalised recommendations