Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of physiologic function of colonic pouch anastomoses after excision for rectal cancer

  • Clinical Observations
  • Published:
Chinese Journal of Cancer Research

Abstract

Objective: To study the physiology value of colonic pouch anastomosis after rectal cancer excision. Methods: Forty-six patients with total mesonectal excision for carcinoma were randomized to either a straight (Group A, n=23) or a colonic pouch anastomosis (Group B, n=23). The neorectal physiologic function of patients in both groups was evaluated, which included laboratory studies. Results: Sphincter pressures in both groups were similar. Preoperative compliance of the rectum was restored after surgery in the Group B, 0.296 (0.224–0.347) L/Kpa, but there was a significant decrease after surgery in the Group A, 0.194 (0.112–0.235) L/Kpa P<0.001. By a multiple regression analysis, neo-rectal complicance was associated with favorable clinical function, and hypermotility of the canal was associated with adverse clinical function. Conclusion: Colonic pouch-anastomosis restores neorectal compliance, which is important for good function after low anterior resection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Xiao XW. Relationship between internal anal sphincter function and length of remaining rectum after resecting rectal carcinoma. World Chin J Diges 1998; 6:643.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Williams NA, Price R, Johnston D. The long term effect of sphincter preserving operations for rectal carcinoma on function of the anal sphincter in man. Br J Surg 1980; 67:203.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Williamson Me, Lewis WG, Holdsworth PJ, et al. Decrease in the anorectal pressure gradient after low anterior resection of the rectum: a study using continuous ambulatory manometry. Dis Colon Rectum 1994; 37:1228.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lazorthes F, Fages P, Chiotasso P, et al. Resection of the rectum with construction of a colonic reservoir and colo-anal anastomosis for carcinoma of the rectum. Br J Surg 1986; 73:136.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Batignani G, Monaci I, Ficari F. What affects continence after anterior resection of the rectum? Dis Colon Rectum 1991; 34:329.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Williamson Mej, Lewis WG, Finan PJ, et al. Recovery of physiologic and clinical function after low anterior resection of the rectum for carcinoma: myth or reality? Dis Colon Rectum 1995; 38:411.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Miller AS, Lewis WG, Holdsworth PJ, et al. Factors that influence functional outcome after colonal anastomosis for carcinoma of the rectum. Br J Surg 1995; 1327.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhongrong, H. Evaluation of physiologic function of colonic pouch anastomoses after excision for rectal cancer. Chin. J. Cancer Res. 11, 299–302 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11670-999-0040-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11670-999-0040-9

Key words

Navigation